Suppr超能文献

印度声称对水进行处理的家庭中家庭水处理的使用一致性和有效性

Consistency of Use and Effectiveness of Household Water Treatment among Indian Households Claiming to Treat Their Water.

作者信息

Rosa Ghislaine, Clasen Thomas

机构信息

Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.

Department of Environmental Health, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.

出版信息

Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2017 Jul;97(1):259-270. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.16-0428.

Abstract

Household water treatment (HWT) can improve drinking water quality and prevent disease if used correctly and consistently by populations at risk. Current international monitoring estimates by the Joint Monitoring Programme for water and sanitation suggest that at least 1.1 billion people practice HWT. These estimates, however, are based on surveys that may overstate the level of consistent use and do not address microbial effectiveness. We sought to assess how HWT is practiced among households identified as HWT users according to these monitoring standards. After a baseline survey (urban: 189 households, rural: 210 households) to identify HWT users, 83 urban and 90 rural households were followed up for 6 weeks. Consistency of reported HWT practices was high in both urban (100%) and rural (93.3%) settings, as was availability of treated water (based on self-report) in all three sampling points (urban: 98.8%, rural: 76.0%). Nevertheless, only 13.7% of urban and 25.8% of rural households identified at baseline as users of adequate HWT had water free of thermotolerant coliforms at all three water sampling points. Our findings raise questions about the value of the data gathered through the international monitoring of HWT as predictors of water quality in the home, as well as questioning the ability of HWT, as actually practiced by vulnerable populations, to reduce exposure to waterborne diseases.

摘要

家庭水处理(HWT)如果被高危人群正确且持续使用,可改善饮用水质量并预防疾病。目前由水与卫生设施联合监测计划进行的国际监测估计表明,至少有11亿人采用家庭水处理。然而,这些估计是基于可能高估持续使用水平且未涉及微生物有效性的调查得出的。我们试图评估根据这些监测标准被认定为家庭水处理使用者的家庭中,家庭水处理是如何实施的。在进行了一项基线调查(城市:189户家庭,农村:210户家庭)以确定家庭水处理使用者之后,对83户城市家庭和90户农村家庭进行了为期6周的跟踪调查。在城市(100%)和农村(93.3%)地区,报告的家庭水处理做法的一致性都很高,在所有三个采样点(城市:98.8%,农村:76.0%),经处理的水(基于自我报告)的可得性也很高。然而,在基线时被认定为采用适当家庭水处理的城市家庭中,只有13.7%,农村家庭中只有25.8%在所有三个水采样点的水中没有耐热大肠菌群。我们的研究结果对通过家庭水处理国际监测收集的数据作为家庭水质预测指标的价值提出了质疑,同时也对弱势群体实际采用的家庭水处理减少接触水传播疾病的能力提出了质疑。

相似文献

6
Estimating the scope of household water treatment in low- and medium-income countries.
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2010 Feb;82(2):289-300. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.2010.09-0382.
7
A hierarchical Bayesian Belief Network model of household water treatment behaviour in a suburban area: A case study of Palu-Indonesia.
PLoS One. 2020 Nov 6;15(11):e0241904. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0241904. eCollection 2020.
10
Microbial quality of well water from rural and urban households in Karnataka, India: a cross-sectional study.
J Infect Public Health. 2012 Jun;5(3):257-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jiph.2012.03.004. Epub 2012 Apr 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Health Trade-Offs of Boiling Drinking Water with Solid Fuels: A Modeling Study.
Environ Health Perspect. 2025 Jun;133(6):67021. doi: 10.1289/EHP15059. Epub 2025 Jun 23.
3
Embedding Usage Sensors in Point-of-Use Water Treatment Devices: Sensor Design and Application in Limpopo, South Africa.
Environ Sci Technol. 2021 Jul 6;55(13):8955-8964. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.0c08683. Epub 2021 Jun 16.
4
Perspectives and Practices on Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene from a Fishing Community along Lake Malombe, Southern Malawi.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Sep 15;17(18):6703. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17186703.
5
The Critical Role of Compliance in Delivering Health Gains from Environmental Health Interventions.
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2019 Apr;100(4):777-779. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.18-0624.

本文引用的文献

1
Faecal contamination of household drinking water in Rwanda: A national cross-sectional study.
Sci Total Environ. 2016 Nov 15;571:426-34. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.06.226. Epub 2016 Jul 26.
3
Interventions to improve water quality for preventing diarrhoea.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Oct 20;2015(10):CD004794. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004794.pub3.
6
Seasonal variation of fecal contamination in drinking water sources in developing countries: a systematic review.
Sci Total Environ. 2015 May 1;514:333-43. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.01.018. Epub 2015 Feb 10.
8
Reactivity in rapidly collected hygiene and toilet spot check measurements: a cautionary note for longitudinal studies.
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2015 Jan;92(1):159-62. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.14-0306. Epub 2014 Nov 10.
9
Global monitoring of water supply and sanitation: history, methods and future challenges.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2014 Aug 11;11(8):8137-65. doi: 10.3390/ijerph110808137.
10
Global assessment of exposure to faecal contamination through drinking water based on a systematic review.
Trop Med Int Health. 2014 Aug;19(8):917-27. doi: 10.1111/tmi.12334. Epub 2014 May 8.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验