Rosa Ghislaine, Clasen Thomas
Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Department of Environmental Health, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2017 Jul;97(1):259-270. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.16-0428.
Household water treatment (HWT) can improve drinking water quality and prevent disease if used correctly and consistently by populations at risk. Current international monitoring estimates by the Joint Monitoring Programme for water and sanitation suggest that at least 1.1 billion people practice HWT. These estimates, however, are based on surveys that may overstate the level of consistent use and do not address microbial effectiveness. We sought to assess how HWT is practiced among households identified as HWT users according to these monitoring standards. After a baseline survey (urban: 189 households, rural: 210 households) to identify HWT users, 83 urban and 90 rural households were followed up for 6 weeks. Consistency of reported HWT practices was high in both urban (100%) and rural (93.3%) settings, as was availability of treated water (based on self-report) in all three sampling points (urban: 98.8%, rural: 76.0%). Nevertheless, only 13.7% of urban and 25.8% of rural households identified at baseline as users of adequate HWT had water free of thermotolerant coliforms at all three water sampling points. Our findings raise questions about the value of the data gathered through the international monitoring of HWT as predictors of water quality in the home, as well as questioning the ability of HWT, as actually practiced by vulnerable populations, to reduce exposure to waterborne diseases.
家庭水处理(HWT)如果被高危人群正确且持续使用,可改善饮用水质量并预防疾病。目前由水与卫生设施联合监测计划进行的国际监测估计表明,至少有11亿人采用家庭水处理。然而,这些估计是基于可能高估持续使用水平且未涉及微生物有效性的调查得出的。我们试图评估根据这些监测标准被认定为家庭水处理使用者的家庭中,家庭水处理是如何实施的。在进行了一项基线调查(城市:189户家庭,农村:210户家庭)以确定家庭水处理使用者之后,对83户城市家庭和90户农村家庭进行了为期6周的跟踪调查。在城市(100%)和农村(93.3%)地区,报告的家庭水处理做法的一致性都很高,在所有三个采样点(城市:98.8%,农村:76.0%),经处理的水(基于自我报告)的可得性也很高。然而,在基线时被认定为采用适当家庭水处理的城市家庭中,只有13.7%,农村家庭中只有25.8%在所有三个水采样点的水中没有耐热大肠菌群。我们的研究结果对通过家庭水处理国际监测收集的数据作为家庭水质预测指标的价值提出了质疑,同时也对弱势群体实际采用的家庭水处理减少接触水传播疾病的能力提出了质疑。