• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

设计一份问卷以确定自我管理对糖尿病的影响:倾听糖尿病患者的声音。

Developing a questionnaire to determine the impact of self-management in diabetes: giving people with diabetes a voice.

作者信息

Carlton J, Elliott J, Rowen D, Stevens K, Basarir H, Meadows K, Brazier J

机构信息

School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Regent Court, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK.

Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Sheffield, UK.

出版信息

Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2017 Jul 18;15(1):146. doi: 10.1186/s12955-017-0719-4.

DOI:10.1186/s12955-017-0719-4
PMID:28720133
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5516314/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The prevalence of diabetes mellitus (DM) is increasing dramatically, placing considerable financial burden on the healthcare budget of each country. Patient self-management is crucial for the control of blood glucose, which largely determines the chances of developing diabetes-related complications. Self-management interventions vary widely, and a method is required for assessing the impact of self-management. This paper describes the development of a questionnaire intended for use to measure the impact of self-management in diabetes.

METHODS

An iterative development process was undertaken to identify the attributes of self-management using 5 steps. First, a literature review was undertaken to identify and understand themes relating to self-management of DM to inform a topic guide. Second, the topic guide was further refined following consultation with a Patient and Public Involvement group. Third, the topic guide was used to inform semi-structured interviews with patients with Type 1 DM (T1DM) and Type 2 DM (T2DM) to identify how self-management of DM affects individuals. Fourth, the research team considered potential attributes alongside health attributes from an existing measure (Diabetes Health Profile, DHP) to produce an instrument reflecting both health and self-management outcomes simultaneously. Finally, a draft instrument was tested in a focus group to determine the wording and acceptability.

RESULTS

Semi-structured interviews were carried out with 32 patients with T1DM and T2DM. Eight potential attributes were identified: fear/worry/anxiety, guilt, stress, stigma, hassle, control, freedom, and feeling supported. Four of these self-management attributes were selected with four health attributes (mood, worry about hypos (hypoglycaemic episodes), vitality and social limitations) to produce the Health and Self-Management in Diabetes (HASMID) questionnaire.

CONCLUSIONS

HASMID is a short questionnaire that contains eight items each with four response levels to measure the impact of self-management in diabetes for both T1DM and T2DM. The measure was developed using a mixed-methods approach that involved semi-structured interviews with people with diabetes. The measure has high face validity. Ongoing research is being undertaken to assess the validity of this questionnaire for measuring the impact of self-management interventions in economic evaluation.

摘要

背景

糖尿病(DM)的患病率正在急剧上升,给各国的医疗保健预算带来了相当大的经济负担。患者自我管理对于血糖控制至关重要,而血糖控制在很大程度上决定了发生糖尿病相关并发症的几率。自我管理干预措施差异很大,因此需要一种方法来评估自我管理的影响。本文描述了一份旨在用于测量糖尿病自我管理影响的问卷的开发过程。

方法

采用迭代开发过程,通过5个步骤确定自我管理的属性。首先,进行文献综述以识别和理解与糖尿病自我管理相关的主题,为主题指南提供信息。其次,在与患者及公众参与小组协商后,对主题指南进行进一步完善。第三,使用主题指南对1型糖尿病(T1DM)和2型糖尿病(T2DM)患者进行半结构化访谈,以确定糖尿病自我管理如何影响个体。第四,研究团队将潜在属性与现有测量工具(糖尿病健康概况,DHP)中的健康属性相结合,以生成一个同时反映健康和自我管理结果的工具。最后,在一个焦点小组中对问卷初稿进行测试,以确定措辞和可接受性。

结果

对32例T1DM和T2DM患者进行了半结构化访谈。确定了8个潜在属性:恐惧/担忧/焦虑、内疚、压力、耻辱感、麻烦、控制、自由和感到得到支持。从这些自我管理属性中选择了4个,与4个健康属性(情绪、对低血糖发作的担忧、活力和社交限制)一起,生成了糖尿病健康与自我管理(HASMID)问卷。

结论

HASMID是一份简短的问卷,包含8个项目,每个项目有4个回答级别,用于测量T1DM和T2DM患者糖尿病自我管理的影响。该测量工具采用混合方法开发,其中包括对糖尿病患者进行半结构化访谈。该测量工具具有较高的表面效度。正在进行的研究旨在评估该问卷在经济评估中测量自我管理干预影响的有效性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/96ea/5516314/4a96377ec50e/12955_2017_719_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/96ea/5516314/4a96377ec50e/12955_2017_719_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/96ea/5516314/4a96377ec50e/12955_2017_719_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Developing a questionnaire to determine the impact of self-management in diabetes: giving people with diabetes a voice.设计一份问卷以确定自我管理对糖尿病的影响:倾听糖尿病患者的声音。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2017 Jul 18;15(1):146. doi: 10.1186/s12955-017-0719-4.
2
Assessment of the psychometric properties and refinement of the Health and Self-Management in Diabetes Questionnaire (HASMID).评估《糖尿病健康与自我管理问卷》(HASMID)的心理测量特性和优化。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020 Mar 5;18(1):59. doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-01305-3.
3
Structured, intensive education maximising engagement, motivation and long-term change for children and young people with diabetes: a cluster randomised controlled trial with integral process and economic evaluation - the CASCADE study.结构化、强化教育最大限度地提高糖尿病患儿和青少年的参与度、积极性和长期改变:一项具有整体过程和经济评估的群组随机对照试验 - CASCADE 研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2014 Mar;18(20):1-202. doi: 10.3310/hta18200.
4
Using qualitative methods in developing an instrument to identify barriers to self-care among persons with type 2 diabetes mellitus.运用定性方法开发一种工具,以识别2型糖尿病患者自我护理的障碍。
J Clin Nurs. 2015 Apr;24(7-8):1024-37. doi: 10.1111/jocn.12740. Epub 2014 Dec 19.
5
Impact of severe and symptomatic hypoglycemia on quality of life and fear of hypoglycemia in type 1 and type 2 diabetes. Results of the Hypos-1 observational study.严重和有症状的低血糖对 1 型和 2 型糖尿病患者生活质量和对低血糖恐惧的影响。Hypos-1 观察性研究结果。
Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2019 Jul;29(7):736-743. doi: 10.1016/j.numecd.2019.04.009. Epub 2019 May 6.
6
The influence of diabetes psychosocial attributes and self-management practices on change in diabetes status.糖尿病心理社会特征和自我管理行为对糖尿病状态变化的影响。
Patient Educ Couns. 2012 Apr;87(1):74-80. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2011.07.013. Epub 2011 Aug 15.
7
Closing the gap between literature and practice: evaluation of a teaching programme (in the absence of a structured treatment) on both type 1 and type 2 diabetes.弥合文献与实践之间的差距:对一项针对1型和2型糖尿病(在缺乏结构化治疗的情况下)的教学计划的评估。
Diabetes Nutr Metab. 2003 Oct-Dec;16(5-6):298-305.
8
9
Management of diabetes mellitus and patients' attitude towards the disease: Data from a nationwide study in Greece.糖尿病管理与患者对该疾病的态度:来自希腊一项全国性研究的数据。
Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2019 Mar-Apr;13(2):1159-1164. doi: 10.1016/j.dsx.2019.01.030. Epub 2019 Jan 26.
10
The Impact of Social Support on Self-care of Patients With Diabetes: What Is the Effect of Diabetes Type? Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.社会支持对糖尿病患者自我护理的影响:糖尿病类型的影响是什么?系统评价和荟萃分析。
Diabetes Educ. 2017 Aug;43(4):396-412. doi: 10.1177/0145721717712457. Epub 2017 Jun 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Advances in orthodontic treatment for periodontal disease: a bibliometric analysis, emerging insights and clinical implications.牙周病正畸治疗的进展:文献计量分析、新见解及临床意义
Front Dent Med. 2025 Jul 24;6:1600672. doi: 10.3389/fdmed.2025.1600672. eCollection 2025.
2
Translation, cross-cultural adaptation, and validation of health and self-management in diabetes questionnaire (HASMID-10) into Brazilian Portuguese.将健康和自我管理在糖尿病问卷(HASMID-10)翻译成巴西葡萄牙语的翻译、跨文化适应性和验证。
Sao Paulo Med J. 2023 Jun 19;142(1):e2022681. doi: 10.1590/1516-3180.2022.0681.R1.10042023. eCollection 2024.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Patient preferences for diabetes management among people with type 2 diabetes in Denmark - a discrete choice experiment.丹麦 2 型糖尿病患者对糖尿病管理的偏好 - 一项离散选择实验。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2011 Nov;27(11):2175-83. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2011.625404. Epub 2011 Oct 10.
2
A discrete choice experiment evaluation of patients' preferences for different risk, benefit, and delivery attributes of insulin therapy for diabetes management.一项关于糖尿病管理中胰岛素治疗不同风险、益处及给药属性的患者偏好的离散选择实验评估。
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2010 Dec 8;4:433-40. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S14217.
3
How does cost matter in health-care discrete-choice experiments?
Educational needs of people with type 1 diabetes mellitus and their parents: A cross-sectional study.
1 型糖尿病患者及其父母的教育需求:一项横断面研究。
Nurs Open. 2023 Jul;10(7):4849-4858. doi: 10.1002/nop2.1737. Epub 2023 Apr 12.
4
Producing a preference-based quality of LIFE measure to quantify the impact of HYPOGLYCAEMIA on people living with diabetes: A mixed-methods research protocol.制定基于偏好的生活质量衡量标准,以量化低血糖对糖尿病患者的影响:一项混合方法研究方案。
Diabet Med. 2023 Mar;40(3):e15007. doi: 10.1111/dme.15007. Epub 2022 Nov 29.
5
Adapting a Patient-Reported Outcome Measure to Digital Outpatient Specialist Health Care Services for Type 1 Diabetes: User Involvement Study.将患者报告的结局测量方法应用于1型糖尿病数字门诊专科医疗服务:用户参与研究。
JMIR Hum Factors. 2022 Nov 15;9(4):e38678. doi: 10.2196/38678.
6
The experience of blood glucose monitoring in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).2 型糖尿病患者的血糖监测体验。
Endocrinol Diabetes Metab. 2022 Mar;5(2):e00302. doi: 10.1002/edm2.302. Epub 2021 Dec 17.
7
Relationship between Diabetes Family Conflicts or Problem Recognition in Illness Self-Management and Quality of Life of Adolescents with T1DM and Their Parents.青少年 1 型糖尿病患者及其父母的糖尿病家庭冲突或疾病自我管理中的问题识别与生活质量的关系。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Oct 13;18(20):10710. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182010710.
8
The participatory development of a national core set of person-centred diabetes outcome constructs for use in routine diabetes care across healthcare sectors.为跨医疗保健部门的常规糖尿病护理制定一套以患者为中心的糖尿病结局指标的国家核心集的参与式开发。
Res Involv Engagem. 2021 Sep 10;7(1):62. doi: 10.1186/s40900-021-00309-7.
9
The Relationship between Diabetes Family Conflict and Parental Conflict on Problem Recognition in Illness Self-Management among Individuals with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus.1 型糖尿病患者疾病自我管理中糖尿病家庭冲突与父母冲突对问题识别的关系。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Aug 25;18(17):8914. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18178914.
10
Protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial of the DAFNE (Dose Adjustment For Normal Eating) intervention compared with 5x1 DAFNE: a lifelong approach to promote effective self-management in adults with type 1 diabetes.一项关于 DAFNE(正常饮食剂量调整)干预与 5x1DAFNE 的群组随机对照试验方案:一种促进 1 型糖尿病成人有效自我管理的终身方法。
BMJ Open. 2021 Jan 18;11(1):e040438. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040438.
在健康医疗离散选择实验中,成本有何重要性?
Health Econ. 2011 Mar;20(3):323-30. doi: 10.1002/hec.1591.
4
The Irish DAFNE study protocol: a cluster randomised trial of group versus individual follow-up after structured education for type 1 diabetes.爱尔兰 DAFNE 研究方案:1 型糖尿病结构化教育后团体随访与个体随访的群组随机试验。
Trials. 2009 Sep 23;10:88. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-10-88.
5
Developing a descriptive system for a new preference-based measure of health-related quality of life for children.为儿童健康相关生活质量的新偏好测量制定描述性系统。
Qual Life Res. 2009 Oct;18(8):1105-13. doi: 10.1007/s11136-009-9524-9. Epub 2009 Aug 20.
6
Effectiveness of the diabetes education and self management for ongoing and newly diagnosed (DESMOND) programme for people with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes: cluster randomised controlled trial.针对新诊断出2型糖尿病患者的糖尿病教育与自我管理(DESMOND)项目的有效性:整群随机对照试验。
BMJ. 2008 Mar 1;336(7642):491-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39474.922025.BE. Epub 2008 Feb 14.
7
Development of a tool to examine the effect of venous ulcers on patients' quality of life.
Nurs Stand. 2007;21(45):57-8, 60, 62 passim. doi: 10.7748/ns2007.07.21.45.57.c4585.
8
Measurement of health-related quality of life for people with dementia: development of a new instrument (DEMQOL) and an evaluation of current methodology.痴呆症患者健康相关生活质量的测量:一种新工具(DEMQOL)的开发及当前方法的评估
Health Technol Assess. 2005 Mar;9(10):1-93, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta9100.
9
Patient preference and willingness-to-pay for Humalog Mix25 relative to Humulin 30/70: a multicountry application of a discrete choice experiment.与优泌林70/30相比,患者对优泌乐25的偏好及支付意愿:离散选择实验的多国应用
Value Health. 2004 Jul-Aug;7(4):442-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2004.74007.x.
10
Training in flexible, intensive insulin management to enable dietary freedom in people with type 1 diabetes: dose adjustment for normal eating (DAFNE) randomised controlled trial.1型糖尿病患者灵活强化胰岛素管理训练以实现饮食自由:正常饮食剂量调整(DAFNE)随机对照试验
BMJ. 2002 Oct 5;325(7367):746. doi: 10.1136/bmj.325.7367.746.