• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

长期慢性呼吸机治疗病房出院患者的1年生存率

1-Year Survival of Subjects Discharged From a Long-Term Chronic Ventilator Unit.

作者信息

Galiatsatos Panagis, Friedlander Tracy, Dababneh Dina, Nelson Katie, Kelly Denise, Finucane Thomas, Bellantoni Michelle, Greenough William B

机构信息

Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.

Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.

出版信息

Respir Care. 2017 Oct;62(10):1284-1290. doi: 10.4187/respcare.05419. Epub 2017 Jul 18.

DOI:10.4187/respcare.05419
PMID:28720672
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Among survivors of intensive care, many remain dependent on mechanical ventilation and are discharged to long-term chronic ventilator units or to skilled nursing facilities. Few long-term outcome data are available on patients transferred from long-term chronic ventilator units.

METHODS

We retrospectively followed subjects discharged from a long-term chronic ventilator unit from 2010-2012. We determined where these subjects went, evaluating whether location of discharge had an effect on mortality.

RESULTS

We followed 79 subjects who were 64.9 ± 15.9 y old. Average stay in the long-term chronic ventilator unit was 38.5 ± 20.1 d. Within the first year after discharge, 24 (30.3%) subjects died: 17 in a skilled nursing facility, 7 at home. Of those who survived the first year, 28 had been discharged to a skilled nursing facility and 27 to home. Survivors were younger (62.6 ± 12.4 vs 70.4 ± 13.1 y, = .03), had shorter intensive care unit lengths of stay (10.4 ± 5.0 vs 16.4 ± 11.5 d, = .03), and were more likely discharged home from long-term chronic ventilator unit (49.0% vs 29.1%, = .040).

CONCLUSIONS

Subjects discharged from an long-term chronic ventilator unit and were alive at 1 y had shorter stays in the ICU and were more likely to be discharged home. Further attention is warranted to assure the survival of critical care patients once they are discharged from intensive care units.

摘要

引言

在重症监护幸存者中,许多人仍依赖机械通气,出院后被转至长期慢性呼吸机病房或专业护理机构。关于从长期慢性呼吸机病房转出患者的长期预后数据很少。

方法

我们对2010年至2012年从长期慢性呼吸机病房出院的患者进行了回顾性随访。我们确定了这些患者的去向,评估出院地点是否对死亡率有影响。

结果

我们随访了79名年龄为64.9±15.9岁的患者。在长期慢性呼吸机病房的平均住院时间为38.5±20.1天。出院后的第一年内,24名(30.3%)患者死亡:17名在专业护理机构,7名在家中。在存活超过第一年的患者中,28名被转至专业护理机构,27名回家。存活者更年轻(62.6±12.4岁对70.4±13.1岁,P =.03),重症监护病房住院时间更短(10.4±5.0天对16.4±11.5天,P =.03),并且更有可能从长期慢性呼吸机病房直接回家(49.0%对29.1%,P =.040)。

结论

从长期慢性呼吸机病房出院且存活1年的患者在重症监护病房住院时间更短,且更有可能直接回家。对于重症监护患者出院后的生存情况,需要给予更多关注以确保其存活。

相似文献

1
1-Year Survival of Subjects Discharged From a Long-Term Chronic Ventilator Unit.长期慢性呼吸机治疗病房出院患者的1年生存率
Respir Care. 2017 Oct;62(10):1284-1290. doi: 10.4187/respcare.05419. Epub 2017 Jul 18.
2
Effects of a multidisciplinary care program on disability, autonomy, and nursing needs in subjects recovering from acute respiratory failure in a chronic ventilator facility.多学科护理计划对长期使用呼吸机设施的急性呼吸衰竭康复患者的残疾、自主性和护理需求的影响。
Respir Care. 2014 Dec;59(12):1863-71. doi: 10.4187/respcare.03030. Epub 2014 Sep 2.
3
Outcomes of Tracheostomized Subjects Undergoing Prolonged Mechanical Ventilation in an Intermediate-Care Facility.在中级护理机构接受长期机械通气的气管切开患者的治疗结果。
Respir Care. 2018 Mar;63(3):282-288. doi: 10.4187/respcare.05602. Epub 2018 Jan 23.
4
Three-year outcomes for Medicare beneficiaries who survive intensive care.接受重症监护治疗的 Medicare 受益人的三年预后。
JAMA. 2010 Mar 3;303(9):849-56. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.216.
5
[Tracheostomy performed in ICU: Professional practice assessment and patient outcome].[重症监护病房中实施的气管切开术:专业实践评估与患者预后]
Rev Mal Respir. 2018 Jan;35(1):25-35. doi: 10.1016/j.rmr.2016.12.004. Epub 2018 Feb 1.
6
Analysis of a Pediatric Home Mechanical Ventilator Population.儿科家庭机械通气人群分析
Respir Care. 2018 May;63(5):558-564. doi: 10.4187/respcare.05644. Epub 2018 Mar 6.
7
Liberation from prolonged mechanical ventilation.摆脱长期机械通气。
Crit Care Clin. 2002 Jul;18(3):569-95. doi: 10.1016/s0749-0704(02)00016-7.
8
Patient characteristics and outcomes of a provincial prolonged-ventilation weaning centre: a retrospective cohort study.省级长时间通气撤机中心患者特征和结局:一项回顾性队列研究。
Can Respir J. 2012 May-Jun;19(3):216-20. doi: 10.1155/2012/358265.
9
Long-term survival of critically ill patients treated with prolonged mechanical ventilation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.接受长时间机械通气治疗的危重症患者的长期生存:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Lancet Respir Med. 2015 Jul;3(7):544-53. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(15)00150-2. Epub 2015 May 20.
10
Hospital outcomes and long-term survival after referral to a specialized weaning unit.转诊至专门的撤机单元后的医院转归和长期生存率。
Br J Anaesth. 2017 Apr 1;118(4):563-569. doi: 10.1093/bja/aex031.