• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于推特用户移动模式分析的城市土地利用社会感知

Social sensing of urban land use based on analysis of Twitter users' mobility patterns.

作者信息

Soliman Aiman, Soltani Kiumars, Yin Junjun, Padmanabhan Anand, Wang Shaowen

机构信息

CyberGIS Center for Advanced Digital and Spatial Studies, National Center for Supercomputing Applications, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, Illinois, United States of America.

Illinois Informatics Institute, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, Illinois, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2017 Jul 19;12(7):e0181657. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0181657. eCollection 2017.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0181657
PMID:28723936
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5517059/
Abstract

A number of recent studies showed that digital footprints around built environments, such as geo-located tweets, are promising data sources for characterizing urban land use. However, challenges for achieving this purpose exist due to the volume and unstructured nature of geo-located social media. Previous studies focused on analyzing Twitter data collectively resulting in coarse resolution maps of urban land use. We argue that the complex spatial structure of a large collection of tweets, when viewed through the lens of individual-level human mobility patterns, can be simplified to a series of key locations for each user, which could be used to characterize urban land use at a higher spatial resolution. Contingent issues that could affect our approach, such as Twitter users' biases and tendencies at locations where they tweet the most, were systematically investigated using 39 million geo-located Tweets and two independent datasets of the City of Chicago: 1) travel survey and 2) parcel-level land use map. Our results support that the majority of Twitter users show a preferential return, where their digital traces are clustered around a few key locations. However, we did not find a general relation among users between the ranks of locations for an individual-based on the density of tweets-and their land use types. On the contrary, temporal patterns of tweeting at key locations were found to be coherent among the majority of users and significantly associated with land use types of these locations. Furthermore, we used these temporal patterns to classify key locations into generic land use types with an overall classification accuracy of 0.78. The contribution of our research is twofold: a novel approach to resolving land use types at a higher resolution, and in-depth understanding of Twitter users' location-related and temporal biases, promising to benefit human mobility and urban studies in general.

摘要

最近的一些研究表明,围绕建成环境的数字足迹,如地理位置推文,是用于描述城市土地利用的有前景的数据来源。然而,由于地理位置社交媒体的数量和非结构化性质,实现这一目的存在挑战。以往的研究集中于对推特数据进行总体分析,从而得出城市土地利用的粗略分辨率地图。我们认为,从个体层面的人类移动模式角度来看,大量推文的复杂空间结构可以简化为每个用户的一系列关键位置,这些关键位置可用于以更高的空间分辨率描述城市土地利用。我们使用3900万条地理位置推文以及芝加哥市的两个独立数据集:1)出行调查和2)地块层面的土地利用地图,系统地研究了可能影响我们方法的偶然问题,如推特用户在其推文最多的位置的偏差和倾向。我们的结果支持这样的观点,即大多数推特用户表现出优先返回的情况,他们的数字痕迹聚集在几个关键位置周围。然而,我们没有发现基于推文密度的个体位置排名与其土地利用类型之间在用户中有普遍关系。相反,发现大多数用户在关键位置的推文时间模式是一致的,并且与这些位置的土地利用类型显著相关。此外,我们利用这些时间模式将关键位置分类为一般土地利用类型,总体分类准确率为0.78。我们研究的贡献有两方面:一种以更高分辨率解析土地利用类型的新方法,以及对推特用户与位置相关的和时间偏差的深入理解,有望总体上有益于人类移动性和城市研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1779/5517059/28f2620f150d/pone.0181657.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1779/5517059/ee50b8e918ae/pone.0181657.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1779/5517059/624419736ca2/pone.0181657.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1779/5517059/99e843e29b84/pone.0181657.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1779/5517059/71fe6cbd24d3/pone.0181657.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1779/5517059/28f2620f150d/pone.0181657.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1779/5517059/ee50b8e918ae/pone.0181657.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1779/5517059/624419736ca2/pone.0181657.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1779/5517059/99e843e29b84/pone.0181657.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1779/5517059/71fe6cbd24d3/pone.0181657.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1779/5517059/28f2620f150d/pone.0181657.g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Social sensing of urban land use based on analysis of Twitter users' mobility patterns.基于推特用户移动模式分析的城市土地利用社会感知
PLoS One. 2017 Jul 19;12(7):e0181657. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0181657. eCollection 2017.
2
Mapping tweets to a known disease epidemiology; a case study of Lyme disease in the United Kingdom and Republic of Ireland.将推文映射到已知疾病流行病学;英国和爱尔兰共和国莱姆病的案例研究。
J Biomed Inform. 2019;100S:100060. doi: 10.1016/j.yjbinx.2019.100060. Epub 2019 Oct 18.
3
A tale of three cities: uncovering human-urban interactions with geographic-context aware social media data.三座城市的故事:利用具有地理上下文感知能力的社交媒体数据揭示人与城市的互动
Urban Inform. 2022;1(1):20. doi: 10.1007/s44212-022-00020-2. Epub 2022 Dec 19.
4
Classification of Twitter Users Who Tweet About E-Cigarettes.发布关于电子烟推文的推特用户分类。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2017 Sep 26;3(3):e63. doi: 10.2196/publichealth.8060.
5
What are health-related users tweeting? A qualitative content analysis of health-related users and their messages on twitter.与健康相关的用户在推特上发些什么?对推特上与健康相关的用户及其信息进行定性内容分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2014 Oct 15;16(10):e237. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3765.
6
The gene patent controversy on Twitter: a case study of Twitter users' responses to the CHEO lawsuit against Long QT gene patents.推特上的基因专利争议:推特用户对 CHEO 起诉长 QT 基因专利案回应的案例研究
BMC Med Ethics. 2015 Aug 25;16:55. doi: 10.1186/s12910-015-0049-1.
7
Do Global Cities Enable Global Views? Using Twitter to Quantify the Level of Geographical Awareness of U.S. Cities.全球城市能带来全球视野吗?利用推特量化美国城市的地理认知水平。
PLoS One. 2015 Jul 13;10(7):e0132464. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0132464. eCollection 2015.
8
Characterizing Sleep Issues Using Twitter.利用推特描述睡眠问题
J Med Internet Res. 2015 Jun 8;17(6):e140. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4476.
9
Geo-Located Tweets. Enhancing Mobility Maps and Capturing Cross-Border Movement.地理位置定位的推文。增强移动性地图并捕捉跨境移动情况。
PLoS One. 2015 Jun 18;10(6):e0129202. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0129202. eCollection 2015.
10
Using Twitter to Better Understand the Spatiotemporal Patterns of Public Sentiment: A Case Study in Massachusetts, USA.利用 Twitter 更好地了解公众情绪的时空模式:以美国马萨诸塞州为例。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Feb 2;15(2):250. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15020250.

引用本文的文献

1
A tale of three cities: uncovering human-urban interactions with geographic-context aware social media data.三座城市的故事:利用具有地理上下文感知能力的社交媒体数据揭示人与城市的互动
Urban Inform. 2022;1(1):20. doi: 10.1007/s44212-022-00020-2. Epub 2022 Dec 19.
2
Comparing the space-time patterns of high-risk areas in different waves of COVID-19 in Hong Kong.比较香港不同波次新冠疫情中高风险地区的时空模式。
Trans GIS. 2021 Dec;25(6):2982-3001. doi: 10.1111/tgis.12800. Epub 2021 Jul 12.
3
Passive citizen science: The role of social media in wildlife observations.

本文引用的文献

1
Understanding Human Mobility from Twitter.从推特理解人类移动性。
PLoS One. 2015 Jul 8;10(7):e0131469. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0131469. eCollection 2015.
2
Geo-Located Tweets. Enhancing Mobility Maps and Capturing Cross-Border Movement.地理位置定位的推文。增强移动性地图并捕捉跨境移动情况。
PLoS One. 2015 Jun 18;10(6):e0129202. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0129202. eCollection 2015.
3
Happiness and the patterns of life: a study of geolocated tweets.幸福与生活模式:一项关于地理位置定位推文的研究。
被动式公民科学:社交媒体在野生动物观测中的作用。
PLoS One. 2021 Aug 18;16(8):e0255416. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0255416. eCollection 2021.
4
Measuring global multi-scale place connectivity using geotagged social media data.利用地理标记社交媒体数据测量全球多尺度地点连通性。
Sci Rep. 2021 Jul 19;11(1):14694. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-94300-7.
5
The Twitter Social Mobility Index: Measuring Social Distancing Practices With Geolocated Tweets.推特社会流动性指数:利用地理位置推文衡量社交距离措施
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Dec 3;22(12):e21499. doi: 10.2196/21499.
6
Pharmaceutical Perspective: How Digital Biomarkers and Contextual Data Will Enable Therapeutic Environments.药学视角:数字生物标志物和背景数据如何推动治疗环境发展。
Digit Biomark. 2017 Aug 17;1(1):73-81. doi: 10.1159/000479951. eCollection 2017 Sep-Dec.
7
Using Twitter to Better Understand the Spatiotemporal Patterns of Public Sentiment: A Case Study in Massachusetts, USA.利用 Twitter 更好地了解公众情绪的时空模式:以美国马萨诸塞州为例。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Feb 2;15(2):250. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15020250.
Sci Rep. 2013;3:2625. doi: 10.1038/srep02625.
4
Limits of predictability in human mobility.人类流动性的可预测性极限。
Science. 2010 Feb 19;327(5968):1018-21. doi: 10.1126/science.1177170.
5
Understanding individual human mobility patterns.理解个体的人类移动模式。
Nature. 2008 Jun 5;453(7196):779-82. doi: 10.1038/nature06958.