• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

推特社会流动性指数:利用地理位置推文衡量社交距离措施

The Twitter Social Mobility Index: Measuring Social Distancing Practices With Geolocated Tweets.

作者信息

Xu Paiheng, Dredze Mark, Broniatowski David A

机构信息

Malone Center for Engineering in Healthcare, Center for Language and Speech Processing, Department of Computer Science, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States.

Department of Engineering Management and Systems Engineering, The George Washington University, Washington, DC, United States.

出版信息

J Med Internet Res. 2020 Dec 3;22(12):e21499. doi: 10.2196/21499.

DOI:10.2196/21499
PMID:33048823
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7717895/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Social distancing is an important component of the response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Minimizing social interactions and travel reduces the rate at which the infection spreads and "flattens the curve" so that the medical system is better equipped to treat infected individuals. However, it remains unclear how the public will respond to these policies as the pandemic continues.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study is to present the Twitter Social Mobility Index, a measure of social distancing and travel derived from Twitter data. We used public geolocated Twitter data to measure how much users travel in a given week.

METHODS

We collected 469,669,925 tweets geotagged in the United States from January 1, 2019, to April 27, 2020. We analyzed the aggregated mobility variance of a total of 3,768,959 Twitter users at the city and state level from the start of the COVID-19 pandemic.

RESULTS

We found a large reduction (61.83%) in travel in the United States after the implementation of social distancing policies. However, the variance by state was high, ranging from 38.54% to 76.80%. The eight states that had not issued statewide social distancing orders as of the start of April ranked poorly in terms of travel reduction: Arkansas (45), Iowa (37), Nebraska (35), North Dakota (22), South Carolina (38), South Dakota (46), Oklahoma (50), Utah (14), and Wyoming (53). We are presenting our findings on the internet and will continue to update our analysis during the pandemic.

CONCLUSIONS

We observed larger travel reductions in states that were early adopters of social distancing policies and smaller changes in states without such policies. The results were also consistent with those based on other mobility data to a certain extent. Therefore, geolocated tweets are an effective way to track social distancing practices using a public resource, and this tracking may be useful as part of ongoing pandemic response planning.

摘要

背景

社交距离是应对新冠疫情的重要组成部分。尽量减少社交互动和出行可降低感染传播速度并“拉平曲线”,从而使医疗系统更有能力治疗感染者。然而,随着疫情持续,公众将如何应对这些政策仍不明确。

目的

本研究的目的是展示推特社交流动性指数,这是一种从推特数据得出的社交距离和出行的衡量指标。我们使用公开的带有地理位置信息的推特数据来衡量用户在给定一周内的出行情况。

方法

我们收集了2019年1月1日至2020年4月27日在美国带有地理标签的469,669,925条推文。我们分析了自新冠疫情开始以来,在城市和州层面上总共3,768,959名推特用户的汇总流动性差异。

结果

我们发现,实施社交距离政策后,美国的出行量大幅下降(61.83%)。然而,各州之间的差异很大,从38.54%到76.80%不等。截至4月初尚未发布全州范围社交距离命令的八个州在出行减少方面排名靠后:阿肯色州(45)、爱荷华州(37)、内布拉斯加州(35)、北达科他州(22)、南卡罗来纳州(38)、南达科他州(46)、俄克拉何马州(50)、犹他州(14)和怀俄明州(53)。我们正在互联网上展示我们的研究结果,并将在疫情期间继续更新我们的分析。

结论

我们观察到,较早采用社交距离政策的州出行减少幅度较大,而没有此类政策的州变化较小。这些结果在一定程度上也与基于其他流动性数据的结果一致。因此,带有地理位置信息的推文是利用公共资源跟踪社交距离做法的有效方式,这种跟踪作为正在进行的疫情应对规划的一部分可能会很有用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/697c/7717895/d5789ba586a6/jmir_v22i12e21499_fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/697c/7717895/9b8a13a84d4a/jmir_v22i12e21499_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/697c/7717895/b474acff97d0/jmir_v22i12e21499_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/697c/7717895/8374c6c4f70f/jmir_v22i12e21499_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/697c/7717895/d5789ba586a6/jmir_v22i12e21499_fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/697c/7717895/9b8a13a84d4a/jmir_v22i12e21499_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/697c/7717895/b474acff97d0/jmir_v22i12e21499_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/697c/7717895/8374c6c4f70f/jmir_v22i12e21499_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/697c/7717895/d5789ba586a6/jmir_v22i12e21499_fig4.jpg

相似文献

1
The Twitter Social Mobility Index: Measuring Social Distancing Practices With Geolocated Tweets.推特社会流动性指数:利用地理位置推文衡量社交距离措施
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Dec 3;22(12):e21499. doi: 10.2196/21499.
2
Defining facets of social distancing during the COVID-19 pandemic: Twitter analysis.新冠疫情期间社交距离的定义:推特分析。
J Biomed Inform. 2020 Nov;111:103601. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2020.103601. Epub 2020 Oct 14.
3
Twitter social mobility data reveal demographic variations in social distancing practices during the COVID-19 pandemic.推特社交流动性数据揭示了 COVID-19 大流行期间社会隔离措施的人口统计学差异。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jan 12;14(1):1165. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-51555-0.
4
Social distancing beliefs and human mobility: Evidence from Twitter.社交距离信念与人类流动性:来自 Twitter 的证据。
PLoS One. 2021 Mar 3;16(3):e0246949. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246949. eCollection 2021.
5
Understanding public perception of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) social distancing on Twitter.理解公众对 2019 冠状病毒病(COVID-19)社交距离的看法 Twitter 上的。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2021 Feb;42(2):131-138. doi: 10.1017/ice.2020.406. Epub 2020 Aug 6.
6
Association Between Public Knowledge About COVID-19, Trust in Information Sources, and Adherence to Social Distancing: Cross-Sectional Survey.公众对 COVID-19 的了解、对信息源的信任与遵守社交距离措施之间的关联:横断面调查。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2020 Sep 15;6(3):e22060. doi: 10.2196/22060.
7
Social Media and Research Publication Activity During Early Stages of the COVID-19 Pandemic: Longitudinal Trend Analysis.社交媒体与 COVID-19 大流行早期阶段的研究出版活动:纵向趋势分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Jun 17;23(6):e26956. doi: 10.2196/26956.
8
Association of Mobile Phone Location Data Indications of Travel and Stay-at-Home Mandates With COVID-19 Infection Rates in the US.手机定位数据显示的出行和居家令与美国 COVID-19 感染率的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Sep 1;3(9):e2020485. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.20485.
9
Twitter Discussions and Emotions About the COVID-19 Pandemic: Machine Learning Approach.关于新冠疫情的推特讨论与情绪:机器学习方法
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Nov 25;22(11):e20550. doi: 10.2196/20550.
10
Social Media Insights Into US Mental Health During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Longitudinal Analysis of Twitter Data.社交媒体洞察美国在 COVID-19 大流行期间的心理健康状况:对 Twitter 数据的纵向分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Dec 14;22(12):e21418. doi: 10.2196/21418.

引用本文的文献

1
A Snapshot of COVID-19 Vaccine Discourse Related to Ethnic Minority Communities in the United Kingdom Between January and April 2022: Mixed Methods Analysis.2022年1月至4月间英国与少数族裔社区相关的新冠疫苗话语快照:混合方法分析
JMIR Form Res. 2024 Mar 26;8:e51152. doi: 10.2196/51152.
2
Twitter social mobility data reveal demographic variations in social distancing practices during the COVID-19 pandemic.推特社交流动性数据揭示了 COVID-19 大流行期间社会隔离措施的人口统计学差异。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jan 12;14(1):1165. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-51555-0.
3
Using geospatial social media data for infectious disease studies: a systematic review.

本文引用的文献

1
Modelling the impact of testing, contact tracing and household quarantine on second waves of COVID-19.建模测试、接触者追踪和家庭隔离对 COVID-19 第二波疫情的影响。
Nat Hum Behav. 2020 Sep;4(9):964-971. doi: 10.1038/s41562-020-0931-9. Epub 2020 Aug 5.
2
Association between mobility patterns and COVID-19 transmission in the USA: a mathematical modelling study.美国移动模式与 COVID-19 传播的关联:一项数学建模研究。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2020 Nov;20(11):1247-1254. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30553-3. Epub 2020 Jul 1.
3
Strong Social Distancing Measures In The United States Reduced The COVID-19 Growth Rate.
利用地理空间社交媒体数据进行传染病研究:一项系统综述。
Int J Digit Earth. 2023;16(1):130-157. doi: 10.1080/17538947.2022.2161652. Epub 2023 Jan 3.
4
Was it really different? COVID-19-pandemic period in long-term recreation monitoring - A case study from Polish forests.它真的有所不同吗?长期休闲监测中的新冠疫情时期——来自波兰森林的案例研究。
J Outdoor Recreat Tour. 2023 Mar;41:100495. doi: 10.1016/j.jort.2022.100495. Epub 2022 Feb 28.
5
Systematic literature review on impacts of COVID-19 pandemic and corresponding measures on mobility.关于新冠疫情及其相应措施对流动性影响的系统文献综述。
Transportation (Amst). 2023 Apr 25:1-55. doi: 10.1007/s11116-023-10392-2.
6
Twitter mobility dynamics during the COVID-19 pandemic: A case study of London.推特在新冠疫情期间的流动动态:以伦敦为例的一项研究
PLoS One. 2023 Apr 26;18(4):e0284902. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0284902. eCollection 2023.
7
A Personalized Avatar-Based Web Application to Help People Understand How Social Distancing Can Reduce the Spread of COVID-19: Cross-sectional, Observational, Pre-Post Study.一个基于个性化虚拟形象的网络应用程序,以帮助人们理解社交距离如何减少新冠病毒的传播:横断面观察性前后研究。
JMIR Form Res. 2023 Apr 25;7:e38430. doi: 10.2196/38430.
8
Cyber-Physical-Social Awareness Platform for Comprehensive Situation Awareness.用于全面态势感知的网络物理社会意识平台。
Sensors (Basel). 2023 Jan 10;23(2):822. doi: 10.3390/s23020822.
9
Nowcasting unemployment rate during the COVID-19 pandemic using Twitter data: The case of South Africa.利用 Twitter 数据实时预测 COVID-19 大流行期间的失业率:以南非为例。
Front Public Health. 2022 Dec 2;10:952363. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.952363. eCollection 2022.
10
Improving Situation Awareness via a Situation Model-Based Intersection of IoT Sensor and Social Media Information Spaces.通过基于情境模型的物联网传感器和社交媒体信息空间的交叉来提高情境意识。
Sensors (Basel). 2022 Oct 14;22(20):7823. doi: 10.3390/s22207823.
美国采取了强有力的社交隔离措施,降低了 COVID-19 的增长率。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2020 Jul;39(7):1237-1246. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2020.00608. Epub 2020 May 14.
4
Population flow drives spatio-temporal distribution of COVID-19 in China.人口流动驱动中国 COVID-19 的时空分布。
Nature. 2020 Jun;582(7812):389-394. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2284-y. Epub 2020 Apr 29.
5
Timing of Community Mitigation and Changes in Reported COVID-19 and Community Mobility - Four U.S. Metropolitan Areas, February 26-April 1, 2020.社区缓解措施的时机与报告的 COVID-19 和社区流动性的变化 - 2020 年 2 月 26 日至 4 月 1 日,美国四个大都市区。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020 Apr 17;69(15):451-457. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6915e2.
6
The effect of control strategies to reduce social mixing on outcomes of the COVID-19 epidemic in Wuhan, China: a modelling study.控制策略对减少社交接触以控制中国武汉 COVID-19 疫情的效果:建模研究。
Lancet Public Health. 2020 May;5(5):e261-e270. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(20)30073-6. Epub 2020 Mar 25.
7
Social sensing of urban land use based on analysis of Twitter users' mobility patterns.基于推特用户移动模式分析的城市土地利用社会感知
PLoS One. 2017 Jul 19;12(7):e0181657. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0181657. eCollection 2017.
8
Geo-located Twitter as proxy for global mobility patterns.基于地理位置的推特作为全球流动模式的代理指标。
Cartogr Geogr Inf Sci. 2014 May 27;41(3):260-271. doi: 10.1080/15230406.2014.890072. Epub 2014 Feb 26.
9
Understanding Vaccine Refusal: Why We Need Social Media Now.理解疫苗抵制:为何我们现在需要社交媒体
Am J Prev Med. 2016 Apr;50(4):550-552. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2015.10.002. Epub 2015 Dec 2.
10
Understanding Human Mobility from Twitter.从推特理解人类移动性。
PLoS One. 2015 Jul 8;10(7):e0131469. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0131469. eCollection 2015.