Costini Orianne, Roy Arnaud, Remigereau Chrystelle, Faure Sylvane, Fossoud Catherine, Le Gall Didier
Unité Vision & Cognition, Fondation Ophtalmologique Adolphe de RothschildParis, France.
Laboratoire Psychologie de la Perception, CNRS UMR 8242, Centre Biomédical des Saints-Pères, Université Paris DescartesParis, France.
Front Psychol. 2017 Jul 4;8:995. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00995. eCollection 2017.
Praxis assessment in children with developmental coordination disorder (DCD) is usually based on tests of adult apraxia, by comparing across types of gestures and input modalities. However, the cognitive models of adult praxis processing are rarely used in a comprehensive and critical interpretation. These models generally involve two systems: a conceptual system and a production system. Heterogeneity of deficits is consistently reported in DCD, involving other cognitive skills such as executive or visual-perceptual and visuospatial functions. Surprisingly, few researches examined the impact of these functions in gestural production. Our study aimed at discussing the nature and specificity of the gestural deficit in DCD using a multiple case study approach. Tasks were selected and adapted from protocols proposed in adult apraxia, in order to enable a comprehensive assessment of gestures. This included conceptual tasks (knowledge about tool functions and actions; recognition of gestures), representational (transitive, intransitive), and non-representational gestures (imitation of meaningless postures). We realized an additional assessment of constructional abilities and other cognitive domains (executive functions, visual-perceptual and visuospatial functions). Data from 27 patients diagnosed with DCD were collected. Neuropsychological profiles were classified using an inferential clinical analysis based on the modified -test, by comparison with 100 typically developing children divided into five age groups (from 7 to 13 years old). Among the 27 DCD patients, we first classified profiles that are characterized by impairment in tasks assessing perceptual visual or visuospatial skills ( = 8). Patients with a weakness in executive functions ( = 6) were then identified, followed by those with an impaired performance in conceptual knowledge tasks ( = 4). Among the nine remaining patients, six could be classified as having a visual spatial/visual constructional dyspraxia. Gestural production deficits were variable between and within profiles. This study confirmed the heterogeneity of gestural production deficit among children with a diagnosis of DCD, at both intra- and inter-individual levels. The contribution of other cognitive deficits in most of the profiles allows discussing the specificity of gestural difficulties. This argues in favor of the necessity to distinguish gestural problems with other deficits made apparent through gesture.
对患有发育性协调障碍(DCD)儿童的实践能力评估通常基于对成人失用症的测试,通过比较不同类型的手势和输入方式来进行。然而,成人实践能力处理的认知模型很少被用于全面且批判性的解读。这些模型一般涉及两个系统:一个概念系统和一个生成系统。在DCD中,缺陷的异质性一直被报道,涉及其他认知技能,如执行功能或视觉感知及视觉空间功能。令人惊讶的是,很少有研究考察这些功能在手势生成中的影响。我们的研究旨在采用多案例研究方法探讨DCD中手势缺陷的本质和特异性。任务是从成人失用症研究中提出的方案中选取并改编的,以便对手势进行全面评估。这包括概念任务(关于工具功能和动作的知识;手势识别)、表征性(及物动词、不及物动词)和非表征性手势(无意义姿势的模仿)。我们还对手工制作能力和其他认知领域(执行功能、视觉感知和视觉空间功能)进行了额外评估。收集了27名被诊断为DCD患者的数据。通过基于改良测试的推断性临床分析,将神经心理学特征进行分类,并与100名发育正常的儿童(分为五个年龄组,7至13岁)进行比较。在27名DCD患者中,我们首先对那些在评估视觉感知或视觉空间技能任务中存在损伤的特征进行分类(n = 8)。接着确定执行功能较弱的患者(n = 6),然后是在概念知识任务中表现受损的患者(n = 4)。在其余9名患者中,6名可被归类为患有视觉空间/视觉构建性失用症。不同特征之间以及同一特征内部的手势生成缺陷存在差异。本研究证实了在诊断为DCD的儿童中,手势生成缺陷在个体内和个体间水平上均具有异质性。大多数特征中其他认知缺陷的存在使得我们能够讨论手势困难的特异性。这表明有必要区分手势问题与通过手势表现出的其他缺陷。