Cotterill Sarah, Howells Kelly, Rhodes Sarah, Bower Peter
Centre for Biostatistics, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK.
NIHR School for Primary Care Research, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Trials. 2017 Jul 20;18(1):341. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2090-5.
Retention of participants in cohort studies is important for validity. One way to promote retention is by sending a persuasive cover letter with surveys. The study aimed to compare the effectiveness of a covering letter containing social pressure with a standard covering letter on retention in a health cohort study. Social pressure involves persuading people to behave in a certain way by the promise that their actions will be made know to others. We implemented a mild form of social pressure, where the recipient was told that information about whether they responded to the current survey would be noted by the research team and printed on future correspondence from the research team to the recipient.
The design was an embedded randomised controlled retention trial, conducted between July 2015 and April 2016 in Salford, UK. Participants in the host health cohort study were eligible. They received either: (1) a covering letter with two consecutive surveys (sent six and twelve months after recruitment), containing a social pressure intervention; or (2) a matching letter without the social pressure text. The primary outcome was retention in the host study, defined as return of both surveys. Randomisation was computer-generated, with stratification by household size. Participants were blinded to group assignment. Researchers were blinded for outcome ascertainment.
Adults (n = 4447) aged over 65 years, with a long-term condition and enrolled in the host study, were randomly allocated to receive a social pressure covering letter (n = 2223) or control (n = 2224). All 4447 participants were included in the analysis. Both questionnaires were returned by 1577 participants (71%) sent the social pressure letters and 1511 (68%) sent control letters, a risk difference of 3 percentage points (adjusted odds ratio = 1.16 (95% confidence interval = 1.02-1.33)).
A mild form of social pressure made a small but significant improvement in retention of older adults in a health cohort study. Investigation of social pressure across other research contexts and stronger social pressure messages is warranted.
The host cohort study, the Comprehensive Longitudinal Assessment of Salford Integrated Care (CLASSIC) study is associated with the CLASSIC PROTECTs trial, which is registered on the ISRCTN registry.
ISRCTN12286422 . Date of registration 19 June 2014.
队列研究中参与者的留存率对于研究的有效性很重要。提高留存率的一种方法是在调查问卷中附上有说服力的说明信。本研究旨在比较在一项健康队列研究中,包含社会压力的说明信与标准说明信在促进参与者留存方面的效果。社会压力是指通过承诺将人们的行为告知他人,来说服他们以某种方式行事。我们采用了一种温和形式的社会压力,即告知收件人研究团队会记录他们是否回复本次调查问卷的信息,并会在研究团队未来给收件人的信件中打印出来。
本研究设计为一项嵌入式随机对照留存试验,于2015年7月至2016年4月在英国索尔福德进行。主要健康队列研究中的参与者符合条件。他们被随机分为两组,分别收到:(1) 两封连续调查问卷(招募后6个月和12个月发送)的说明信,其中包含社会压力干预内容;(2) 一封不包含社会压力文本的匹配信件。主要结局指标是在主要研究中的留存率,定义为两份调查问卷均回复。随机分组由计算机生成,并按家庭规模分层。参与者对分组情况不知情。研究人员在确定结局时也不知情。
年龄超过65岁、患有长期疾病且参与主要研究的成年人(n = 4447)被随机分配接受包含社会压力的说明信(n = 2223)或对照组(n = 2224)。所有4447名参与者均纳入分析。收到社会压力信件的1577名参与者(71%)和收到对照信件的1511名参与者(68%)均回复了两份问卷;风险差异为3个百分点(调整后的优势比 = 1.16(95%置信区间 = 1.02 - 1.33))。
在一项健康队列研究中,一种温和形式的社会压力对提高老年人留存率有虽小但显著的作用。有必要在其他研究背景下对社会压力以及更强的社会压力信息进行调查。
主要队列研究,即索尔福德综合护理综合纵向评估(CLASSIC)研究与CLASSIC PROTECTs试验相关,该试验已在ISRCTN注册中心注册。
ISRCTN12286422。注册日期:2014年6月19日。