Universidade Federal de Pernambuco (UFPE),Departamento de Fisioterapia, Recife, PE, Brazil.
Universidade Federal de Pernambuco (UFPE), Departamento de Anatomia, Recife, PE, Brazil.
Braz J Phys Ther. 2017 Nov-Dec;21(6):400-415. doi: 10.1016/j.bjpt.2017.06.004. Epub 2017 Jul 5.
Physical exercise has been used to mitigate the metabolic effects of diabetes mellitus.
To evaluate the effect of resistance exercise when compared to aerobic exercise without insulin therapy on metabolic and clinical outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Papers were searched on the databases MEDLINE/PubMed, CINAHL, SPORTDiscus, LILACS, and SCIELO, without language or date of publication limits. Clinical trials that compared resistance exercise to aerobic exercise in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus who did not use insulin therapy were included. The quality of evidence and risk of bias were assessed using the GRADE system and the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool, respectively. Meta-analysis was also used, whenever possible. Two reviewers extracted the data independently. Eight eligible articles were included in this study, with a total of 336 individuals, with a mean age of 48-58 years. The protocols of aerobic and resistance exercise varied in duration from eight to 22 weeks, 30-60min/day, three to five times/week.
Overall the available evidence came from a very low quality of evidence and there was an increase in Maximal oxygen consumption (mean difference: -2.86; 95% CI: -3.90 to -1.81; random effect) for the resistance exercise and no difference was found in Glycated hemoglobin, Body mass index, High-density lipoprotein cholesterol, Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, triglycerides, and total cholesterol.
Resistance exercise appears to be more effective in promoting an increase in Maximal oxygen consumption in protocols longer than 12 weeks and there is no difference in the control of glycemic and lipid levels between the two types of exercise.
体育锻炼已被用于减轻糖尿病的代谢影响。
评估与不使用胰岛素治疗的有氧运动相比,抗阻运动对 2 型糖尿病患者代谢和临床结局的影响。
在 MEDLINE/PubMed、CINAHL、SPORTDiscus、LILACS 和 SCIELO 数据库中搜索文献,不设语言和出版日期限制。纳入比较不使用胰岛素治疗的 2 型糖尿病成人患者中抗阻运动与有氧运动的临床试验。使用 GRADE 系统评估证据质量和偏倚风险,使用 Cochrane 偏倚风险工具分别评估风险。只要有可能,也会进行荟萃分析。两位审查员独立提取数据。本研究共纳入 8 篇符合条件的文章,共 336 人,平均年龄 48-58 岁。有氧运动和抗阻运动方案的持续时间从 8 周到 22 周不等,每天 30-60 分钟,每周 3-5 次。
总体而言,现有证据质量非常低,抗阻运动可使最大摄氧量增加(平均差异:-2.86;95%置信区间:-3.90 至-1.81;随机效应),而糖化血红蛋白、体重指数、高密度脂蛋白胆固醇、低密度脂蛋白胆固醇、甘油三酯和总胆固醇无差异。
抗阻运动似乎在 12 周以上的方案中更有效地促进最大摄氧量的增加,而两种运动在血糖和血脂水平的控制方面没有差异。