Halkett Georgia K B, Berg Melissa, Ebert Martin A, Cutt David, Davis Michael, Hegney Desley, House Michael, Judson Michelle, Kearvell Rachel, Krawiec Michele, Lester Leanne, Maresse Sharon, McLoone Peter, McKay Jan
School of Nursing, Midwifery and Paramedicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
Radiation Oncology, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia.
J Med Radiat Sci. 2017 Dec;64(4):299-309. doi: 10.1002/jmrs.237. Epub 2017 Jul 21.
The objectives of this research were to: (1) determine the extent of Australian radiation therapists (RTs) research participation; (2) evaluate the impact of research involvement on career perceptions (3) explore which research topics require investigation and (4) identify benefits and barriers to research participation.
This study used mixed methods to collect qualitative and quantitative data using an online survey from a larger workforce study of RTs and radiation oncology medical physicists. Participants practising in Australia completed questions about their research involvement. Chi-square tests and logistic regression were used to analyse quantitative data and content analysis was used to explore qualitative data.
Two hundred and ninety-six RTs answered the research questions. Forty-six percent had been involved in research. Of these, 91% had been involved in departmental, 28% in national, 14% in international and 29% in informal or self-directed research studies. Eleven RTs (8%) had received funding as a chief/principal investigator. Involvement in research was associated with a desire to make a career change. However, it also appeared to be associated with greater satisfaction with career progression and staying in the career. Respondents identified a range of potential research topics, benefits of participating in research and barriers which included lack of time, support and cost.
Almost half of the RT participants identified that they were participating in research. Our data suggest that continued involvement in research, and opportunities to participate, improve RT job satisfaction. RTs' research activities are likely to be extended through provision of additional time and support.
本研究的目的是:(1)确定澳大利亚放射治疗师(RTs)参与研究的程度;(2)评估研究参与对职业认知的影响;(3)探索哪些研究主题需要调查;(4)确定参与研究的益处和障碍。
本研究采用混合方法,通过在线调查从一项关于RTs和放射肿瘤医学物理学家的更大规模劳动力研究中收集定性和定量数据。在澳大利亚执业的参与者完成了关于他们研究参与情况的问题。使用卡方检验和逻辑回归分析定量数据,并使用内容分析探索定性数据。
296名RTs回答了研究问题。46%的人参与过研究。其中,91%参与过部门研究,28%参与过国家研究,14%参与过国际研究,29%参与过非正式或自主研究。11名RTs(8%)作为首席/主要研究者获得过资金。参与研究与希望改变职业有关。然而,它似乎也与对职业发展的更高满意度以及留在该职业中有关。受访者确定了一系列潜在的研究主题、参与研究的益处和障碍,包括时间、支持和成本的缺乏。
近一半的RT参与者表示他们正在参与研究。我们的数据表明,持续参与研究以及参与机会可以提高RT的工作满意度。通过提供额外的时间和支持,RTs的研究活动可能会得到扩展。