Suppr超能文献

社区社会经济地位对社会经济地位较低者的心血管健康尤为重要。

Neighborhood SES is particularly important to the cardiovascular health of low SES individuals.

机构信息

University of Colorado Denver, United States.

University of Wisconsin-Madison, United States.

出版信息

Soc Sci Med. 2017 Sep;188:60-68. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.07.005. Epub 2017 Jul 8.

Abstract

RATIONALE

Health disparities defined by neighborhood socioeconomic status (SES) are well established; it is less well understood whether neighborhood SES is differentially associated with health depending on one's own SES.

OBJECTIVE

The double jeopardy hypothesis, collective resources model, fundamental cause theory, and relative deprivation hypothesis support differential patterns of association between neighborhood and individual SES with health. The first three models suggest that higher neighborhood SES predicts health more strongly among lower, as compared to higher, SES individuals. The relative deprivation hypothesis suggests that higher SES neighborhoods bring no extra health benefit to low SES individuals and could even bring a health deficit. This study examined competing hypotheses with prospective associations between cardiovascular (CV) health and individual SES, neighborhood SES, and their interaction.

METHOD

Data were from two waves of the Midlife in the United States (MIDUS) Study (N = 1012), a national survey of adults ages 25 and older at baseline. Neighborhood SES was a composite of five census tract-level SES indicators from the 1990 census. Individual SES was a composite of educational attainment and household income at wave one (1995-1996). CV health at wave two (2004-2008), was computed as a composite based on smoking status, body mass index, physical activity, diet, total cholesterol, blood pressure, and glucose.

RESULTS

Individual and neighborhood SES were each associated with CV health net of baseline health status and other covariates. Interactions between individual and neighborhood SES showed that higher neighborhood SES was associated with better CV health for those of lower, not higher, individual SES.

CONCLUSION

Results are consistent with the double jeopardy hypothesis, the collective resources model, and the fundamental cause theory, but not with a relative deprivation hypothesis. Results suggest that additional attention to the neighborhood socioeconomic context of lower SES individuals may reduce SES disparities in cardiovascular health.

摘要

理论依据

以社区社会经济地位(SES)定义的健康差异是既定事实;但人们对社区 SES 是否会根据自身 SES 的不同而与健康产生不同的关联还了解甚少。

目的

双重危害假说、集体资源模型、根本原因理论和相对剥夺假说均支持社区 SES 与健康之间的关联模式因个体 SES 而异。前三个模型表明,与 SES 较高的个体相比,SES 较低的个体的社区 SES 越高,对健康的预测作用就越强。相对剥夺假说则表明,较高 SES 的社区对 SES 较低的个体没有额外的健康益处,甚至可能带来健康缺陷。本研究通过前瞻性关联检验,检验了心血管(CV)健康与个体 SES、社区 SES 及其相互作用的相关假设。

方法

数据来自美国中年研究(MIDUS)的两个波次(N=1012),这是一项对基线时年龄在 25 岁及以上的成年人进行的全国性调查。社区 SES 是由 1990 年人口普查中五个普查区 SES 指标组成的综合指标。个体 SES 是在第一波(1995-1996 年)的教育程度和家庭收入的综合指标。第二波(2004-2008 年)的 CV 健康是根据吸烟状况、体重指数、身体活动、饮食、总胆固醇、血压和血糖计算得出的综合指标。

结果

个体 SES 和社区 SES 均与 CV 健康相关,且独立于基线健康状况和其他协变量。个体 SES 和社区 SES 的相互作用表明,SES 较低而非较高的个体的社区 SES 较高与 CV 健康状况较好相关。

结论

研究结果与双重危害假说、集体资源模型和根本原因理论一致,但与相对剥夺假说不一致。研究结果表明,更多关注 SES 较低个体的社区社会经济环境可能会减少心血管健康方面的 SES 差异。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

3
Twenty Years of Neighborhood Effect Research: An Assessment.邻里效应研究二十年:一项评估
Curr Epidemiol Rep. 2015 Mar;2(1):80-87. doi: 10.1007/s40471-015-0035-7. Epub 2015 Jan 16.
5
Neighborhood features and physiological risk: An examination of allostatic load.邻里特征与生理风险:对负荷应激的考察
Health Place. 2016 Sep;41:110-118. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2016.08.003. Epub 2016 Aug 30.
9
Neighborhood poverty and allostatic load in African American youth.非裔美国青少年的邻里贫困与应激负荷
Pediatrics. 2014 Nov;134(5):e1362-8. doi: 10.1542/peds.2014-1395. Epub 2014 Oct 13.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验