• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

统一社会生态弹性与崩溃的研究。

Unifying Research on Social-Ecological Resilience and Collapse.

机构信息

ARC Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies, James Cook University, Townsville 4811, QLD, Australia.

Stockholm Resilience Centre, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.

出版信息

Trends Ecol Evol. 2017 Sep;32(9):695-713. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2017.06.014. Epub 2017 Jul 19.

DOI:10.1016/j.tree.2017.06.014
PMID:28734593
Abstract

Ecosystems influence human societies, leading people to manage ecosystems for human benefit. Poor environmental management can lead to reduced ecological resilience and social-ecological collapse. We review research on resilience and collapse across different systems and propose a unifying social-ecological framework based on (i) a clear definition of system identity; (ii) the use of quantitative thresholds to define collapse; (iii) relating collapse processes to system structure; and (iv) explicit comparison of alternative hypotheses and models of collapse. Analysis of 17 representative cases identified 14 mechanisms, in five classes, that explain social-ecological collapse. System structure influences the kind of collapse a system may experience. Mechanistic theories of collapse that unite structure and process can make fundamental contributions to solving global environmental problems.

摘要

生态系统影响人类社会,促使人们为了人类利益管理生态系统。不良的环境管理会导致生态弹性降低和社会-生态系统崩溃。我们综述了不同系统中关于弹性和崩溃的研究,并提出了一个统一的社会-生态框架,该框架基于:(i) 明确界定系统身份;(ii) 使用定量阈值来定义崩溃;(iii) 将崩溃过程与系统结构联系起来;以及 (iv) 对崩溃的替代假设和模型进行明确比较。对 17 个有代表性案例的分析确定了 14 种机制,它们属于五个类别,解释了社会-生态系统的崩溃。系统结构会影响系统可能经历的崩溃类型。将结构和过程统一起来的崩溃机制理论,可以为解决全球环境问题做出重要贡献。

相似文献

1
Unifying Research on Social-Ecological Resilience and Collapse.统一社会生态弹性与崩溃的研究。
Trends Ecol Evol. 2017 Sep;32(9):695-713. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2017.06.014. Epub 2017 Jul 19.
2
The fundamental role of ecological feedback mechanisms for the adaptive management of seagrass ecosystems - a review.生态反馈机制在海草生态系统适应性管理中的基础作用——综述
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2017 Aug;92(3):1521-1538. doi: 10.1111/brv.12294. Epub 2016 Sep 1.
3
Adaptive comanagement for building resilience in social-ecological systems.为增强社会生态系统的恢复力而进行的适应性共同管理。
Environ Manage. 2004 Jul;34(1):75-90. doi: 10.1007/s00267-003-0101-7. Epub 2004 Jun 23.
4
Protected areas as social-ecological systems: perspectives from resilience and social-ecological systems theory.保护区作为社会-生态系统:韧性和社会-生态系统理论的视角。
Ecol Appl. 2017 Sep;27(6):1709-1717. doi: 10.1002/eap.1584. Epub 2017 Aug 17.
5
Biological invasions, ecological resilience and adaptive governance.生物入侵、生态恢复力与适应性治理
J Environ Manage. 2016 Dec 1;183(Pt 2):399-407. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.04.040. Epub 2016 Jul 2.
6
Economics, socio-ecological resilience and ecosystem services.经济学、社会生态复原力与生态系统服务
J Environ Manage. 2016 Dec 1;183(Pt 2):389-398. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.07.065. Epub 2016 Jul 29.
7
"And DPSIR begat DAPSI(W)R(M)!" - A unifying framework for marine environmental management.“DPSIR 孕育了 DAPSI(W)R(M)!”——海洋环境管理的统一框架。
Mar Pollut Bull. 2017 May 15;118(1-2):27-40. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2017.03.049. Epub 2017 Apr 7.
8
A dynamic management framework for socio-ecological system stewardship: A case study for the United States Bureau of Ocean Energy Management.社会-生态系统管理的动态管理框架:以美国海洋能源管理局为例。
J Environ Manage. 2018 Nov 1;225:32-45. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.07.078. Epub 2018 Jul 30.
9
Exploring the dynamics of social-ecological resilience in East and West Africa: Preliminary evidence from Tanzania and Niger.探索东非和西非社会生态恢复力的动态:来自坦桑尼亚和尼日尔的初步证据。
Afr Health Sci. 2008 Dec;8 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S28-35.
10
Multi-paddock grazing on rangelands: why the perceptual dichotomy between research results and rancher experience?草原多围场放牧:为什么研究结果和牧场主经验之间存在感知上的二分法?
J Environ Manage. 2013 Oct 15;128:699-717. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.05.064. Epub 2013 Jul 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Frequent disturbances enhanced the resilience of past human populations.频繁的干扰增强了过去人类群体的适应力。
Nature. 2024 May;629(8013):837-842. doi: 10.1038/s41586-024-07354-8. Epub 2024 May 1.
2
Resilience lessons from ancient societies are still relevant today.古代社会的复原力经验教训在今天仍然具有现实意义。
Nature. 2024 May;629(8013):759-760. doi: 10.1038/d41586-024-01189-z.
3
Transient social-ecological dynamics reveal signals of decoupling in a highly disturbed Anthropocene landscape.短暂的社会-生态动态揭示了高度受干扰的人类世景观中去耦的信号。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024 Apr 23;121(17):e2321303121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2321303121. Epub 2024 Apr 19.
4
Scaling approaches and macroecology provide a foundation for assessing ecological resilience in the Anthropocene.尺度转换方法和宏观生态学为评估人类世的生态弹性提供了基础。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2024 May 27;379(1902):20230010. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2023.0010. Epub 2024 Apr 8.
5
A Dynamic Network Model of Societal Complexity and Resilience Inspired by Tainter's Theory of Collapse.受泰纳崩溃理论启发的社会复杂性与恢复力动态网络模型。
Entropy (Basel). 2024 Jan 23;26(2):0. doi: 10.3390/e26020098.
6
Resilience, innovation and collapse of settlement networks in later Bronze Age Europe: New survey data from the southern Carpathian Basin.青铜时代后期欧洲的居住网络的韧性、创新和崩溃:来自喀尔巴阡盆地南部的新调查数据。
PLoS One. 2023 Nov 10;18(11):e0288750. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0288750. eCollection 2023.
7
Navigating polycrisis: long-run socio-cultural factors shape response to changing climate.应对多重危机:长期的社会文化因素塑造了对气候变化的应对方式。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2023 Nov 6;378(1889):20220402. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2022.0402. Epub 2023 Sep 18.
8
A mechanistic framework for social-ecological mismatches.社会生态不匹配的机制框架。
Natl Sci Rev. 2022 Jul 5;10(7):nwac130. doi: 10.1093/nsr/nwac130. eCollection 2023 Jul.
9
Research priorities for the sustainability of coral-rich western Pacific seascapes.富含珊瑚的西太平洋海域景观可持续性的研究重点。
Reg Environ Change. 2023;23(2):66. doi: 10.1007/s10113-023-02051-0. Epub 2023 Apr 21.
10
Global shocks, cascading disruptions, and (re-)connections: viewing the COVID-19 pandemic as concurrent natural experiments to understand land system dynamics.全球冲击、连锁破坏与(重新)连接:将新冠疫情视为并行的自然实验以理解土地系统动态
Landsc Ecol. 2023;38(5):1147-1161. doi: 10.1007/s10980-023-01604-2. Epub 2023 Mar 2.