Whitehead Simon John, Ford Clare, Gama Rousseau Mariano, Ali Ala, McKaig Brian, Waldron Jenna Louise, Steed Helen, Brookes Matthew James
Department of Clinical Chemistry, New Cross Hospital, Wolverhampton, UK.
Research Institute, Healthcare Sciences, Wolverhampton University, Wolverhampton, UK.
J Clin Pathol. 2017 Dec;70(12):1049-1056. doi: 10.1136/jclinpath-2017-204340. Epub 2017 Jul 22.
To prospectively evaluate whether between-assay variability of different faecal calprotectin (f-Cp) assays influences diagnostic accuracy for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) in a cohort of patients with confirmed IBD and irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). To also evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of faecal S100A12 (f-S100A12) against f-Cp in the same patient cohort and assess whether f-S100A12 offers additional diagnostic value.
F-Cp using four commercially available f-Cp assays, f-S100A12 and blood biomarkers were measured in patients, recruited from the local IBD clinic, who had established IBS or active ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD). Diagnostic sensitivities and specificities for each assay and biomarker were calculated and compared.
Median f-Cp levels in all assays were significantly higher in UC (347-884 µg/g; n=28) and CD (377-838 µg/g; n=15) compared with IBS (6-27 µg/g; n=17). Sensitivities and specificities at 50 µg/g were 94%-100% and 82%-100%, respectively. Median f-S100A12 levels were significantly higher in UC (81.0 µg/g; IQR 38.3-159.8) and CD (47.2 µg/g; IQR 5.3-108.9) compared with IBS (0.7 µg/g; IQR 0.5-0.8). At 2.8 µg/g, f-S100A12 had a sensitivity of 97% and specificity of 94%. The blood biomarkers demonstrated sensitivities and specificities of 44%-63% and 80%-92%, respectively.
The diagnostic sensitivity of the calprotectin assays was similar despite inter-kit variability in absolute values. There is a need for f-Cp assay standardisation, but in its absence assay-specific cut-off values may optimise their diagnostic performance. F-S100A12 demonstrated comparable sensitivity and specificity to f-Cp and although a research tool at present, may have a future role to play in the diagnosis and management of these patients.
前瞻性评估不同粪便钙卫蛋白(f-Cp)检测方法之间的检测变异性是否会影响确诊为炎症性肠病(IBD)和肠易激综合征(IBS)患者队列中IBD的诊断准确性。同时评估粪便S100A12(f-S100A12)在同一患者队列中相对于f-Cp的诊断准确性,并评估f-S100A12是否具有额外的诊断价值。
对从当地IBD诊所招募的患有确诊IBS或活动性溃疡性结肠炎(UC)及克罗恩病(CD)的患者,使用四种市售f-Cp检测方法、f-S100A12和血液生物标志物进行检测。计算并比较每种检测方法和生物标志物的诊断敏感性和特异性。
与IBS(6 - 27μg/g;n = 17)相比,UC(347 - 884μg/g;n = 28)和CD(377 - 838μg/g;n = 15)中所有检测方法的f-Cp中位数水平均显著更高。50μg/g时的敏感性和特异性分别为94% - 100%和82% - 100%。与IBS(0.7μg/g;IQR 0.5 - 0.8)相比,UC(81.0μg/g;IQR 38.3 - 159.8)和CD(47.2μg/g;IQR 5.3 - 108.9)中f-S100A12的中位数水平显著更高。在2.8μg/g时,f-S100A12的敏感性为97%,特异性为94%。血液生物标志物的敏感性和特异性分别为44% - 63%和80% - 92%。
尽管试剂盒间绝对值存在变异性,但钙卫蛋白检测方法的诊断敏感性相似。需要对f-Cp检测进行标准化,若无法实现标准化,则特定检测方法的临界值可能会优化其诊断性能。f-S100A12表现出与f-Cp相当的敏感性和特异性,尽管目前是一种研究工具,但可能在这些患者的诊断和管理中发挥未来作用。