Guo Xue, Huang Chen, Xu Jing, Xu Haoming, Liu Le, Zhao Hailan, Wang Jiaqi, Huang Wenqi, Peng Wu, Chen Ye, Nie Yuqiang, Zhou Yongjian, Zhou Youlian
Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, The Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, China.
Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Guangzhou First People's Hospital, School of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, China.
Front Nutr. 2022 Jan 21;8:818902. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2021.818902. eCollection 2021.
Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), which includes ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD), is characterized by relapse and remission alternately. It remains a great challenge to diagnose and assess disease activity during IBD due to the lack of specific markers. While traditional biomarkers from plasma and stool, such as C-reactive protein (CRP), fecal calprotectin (FC), and S100A12, can be used to measure inflammation, they are not specific to IBD and difficult to determine an effective cut-off value. There is consensus that gut microbiota is crucial for intestinal dysbiosis is closely associated with IBD etiopathology and pathogenesis. Multiple studies have documented differences in the composition of gut microbiota between patients with IBD and healthy individuals, particularly regarding microbial diversity and relative abundance of specific bacteria. Patients with IBD have higher levels of and lower amounts of , and than healthy individuals. This review summarizes the pros and cons of using traditional and microbiota biomarkers to assess disease severity and treatment outcomes and addresses the possibility of using microbiota-focused interventions during IBD treatment. Understanding the role of microbial biomarkers in the assessment of disease activity and treatment outcomes has the potential to change clinical practice and lead to the development of more personalized therapies.
炎症性肠病(IBD)包括溃疡性结肠炎(UC)和克罗恩病(CD),其特征为病情交替复发与缓解。由于缺乏特异性标志物,在炎症性肠病期间诊断和评估疾病活动仍然是一项巨大挑战。虽然血浆和粪便中的传统生物标志物,如C反应蛋白(CRP)、粪便钙卫蛋白(FC)和S100A12,可用于测量炎症,但它们并非IBD所特有,且难以确定有效的临界值。目前已达成共识,即肠道微生物群对肠道生态失调至关重要,而肠道生态失调与IBD的病因学和发病机制密切相关。多项研究记录了IBD患者与健康个体之间肠道微生物群组成的差异,特别是在微生物多样性和特定细菌的相对丰度方面。与健康个体相比,IBD患者的[具体细菌A]水平较高,而[具体细菌B]和[具体细菌C]的数量较低。本综述总结了使用传统生物标志物和微生物群生物标志物评估疾病严重程度和治疗结果的利弊,并探讨了在IBD治疗期间采用以微生物群为重点的干预措施的可能性。了解微生物生物标志物在评估疾病活动和治疗结果中的作用有可能改变临床实践,并促使开发更具个性化的疗法。