Su Zhongxin, Hu Z, Peng Xizhe
Institute of Population Research, Fudan University, Shanghai, P.R. China.
Fudan University, Shanghai, P.R. China.
Int J Health Plann Manage. 2017 Jul;32(3):351-362. doi: 10.1002/hpm.2436. Epub 2017 Jul 24.
Using data from the Chinese census and the China Statistical Yearbook, this paper will analyze the historical changes and future trends of family households in China over the past 30 years and explore the changes of family pension functions and corresponding policies. Our analysis yielded 3 notable results. First, in family size miniaturization and structural simplification, 1- and 2-generation family households are the main body of contemporary China. Second, for family aging and changes in living patterns, which primarily manifest as an increase in; the proportion of elderly households and in middle-aged and elderly people in the family, the elderly model and the "multigenerational model" have become the 2 major residence models for the elderly in China. Third, nontraditional families have emerged in large numbers, such as the exclusively elderly family, empty nest family, grandparents family, Double Income, No Kids (DINK) family, older single family, and single-parent family. We argue that in the process of simplification, China's family structure is increasingly showing characteristics of networking. The change in family patterns entails the restoration of traditional functions and taking on new functions of the family by issuing relevant social policies. Only when these social policies are based on family functions and demands can they provide effective help to social members, particularly regarding the family's responsibilities to parent children and support the elderly.
本文利用中国人口普查数据和《中国统计年鉴》,分析中国家庭户在过去30年中的历史变迁和未来趋势,并探讨家庭养老功能的变化及相应政策。我们的分析得出了3个显著结果。第一,在家庭规模小型化和结构简化方面,一代户和二代户是当代中国家庭户的主体。第二,在家庭老龄化和生活模式变化方面,主要表现为老年户比例增加以及家庭中中老年人口增加,老年独居模式和“隔代模式”已成为中国老年人的2种主要居住模式。第三,大量非传统家庭出现,如独居老人家庭、空巢家庭、祖父母家庭、丁克家庭、老年单身家庭和单亲家庭。我们认为,在简化过程中,中国家庭结构日益呈现网络化特征。家庭模式的变化需要恢复传统功能,并通过出台相关社会政策赋予家庭新功能。只有当这些社会政策基于家庭功能和需求时,才能为社会成员提供有效帮助,特别是在家庭养育子女和赡养老人的责任方面。