Suppr超能文献

全球农药人体健康风险控制标准值法规综述

Worldwide Regulations of Standard Values of Pesticides for Human Health Risk Control: A Review.

作者信息

Li Zijian, Jennings Aaron

机构信息

Department of Civil Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA.

Parsons Corporation, Chicago, IL 60606, USA.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Jul 22;14(7):826. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14070826.

Abstract

: The impact of pesticide residues on human health is a worldwide problem, as human exposure to pesticides can occur through ingestion, inhalation, and dermal contact. Regulatory jurisdictions have promulgated the standard values for pesticides in residential soil, air, drinking water, and agricultural commodity for years. Until now, more than 19,400 pesticide soil regulatory guidance values (RGVs) and 5400 pesticide drinking water maximum concentration levels (MCLs) have been regulated by 54 and 102 nations, respectively. Over 90 nations have provided pesticide agricultural commodity maximum residue limits (MRLs) for at least one of the 12 most commonly consumed agricultural foods. A total of 22 pesticides have been regulated with more than 100 soil RGVs, and 25 pesticides have more than 100 drinking water MCLs. This research indicates that those RGVs and MCLs for an individual pesticide could vary over seven (DDT drinking water MCLs), eight (Lindane soil RGVs), or even nine (Dieldrin soil RGVs) orders of magnitude. Human health risk uncertainty bounds and the implied total exposure mass burden model were applied to analyze the most commonly regulated and used pesticides for human health risk control. For the top 27 commonly regulated pesticides in soil, there are at least 300 RGVs (8% of the total) that are above all of the computed upper bounds for human health risk uncertainty. For the top 29 most-commonly regulated pesticides in drinking water, at least 172 drinking water MCLs (5% of the total) exceed the computed upper bounds for human health risk uncertainty; while for the 14 most widely used pesticides, there are at least 310 computed implied dose limits (28.0% of the total) that are above the acceptable daily intake values. The results show that some worldwide standard values were not derived conservatively enough to avoid human health risk by the pesticides, and that some values were not computed comprehensively by considering all major human exposure pathways.

摘要

农药残留对人类健康的影响是一个全球性问题,因为人类可通过摄入、吸入和皮肤接触接触到农药。多年来,各监管辖区已颁布了住宅土壤、空气、饮用水和农产品中农药的标准值。截至目前,分别有54个和102个国家对超过19400个农药土壤监管指导值(RGVs)和5400个农药饮用水最大浓度水平(MCLs)进行了规定。超过90个国家为12种最常消费的农产品中的至少一种规定了农药农产品最大残留限量(MRLs)。共有22种农药的土壤RGVs超过100个,25种农药的饮用水MCLs超过100个。本研究表明,单一农药的那些RGVs和MCLs可能相差七个(滴滴涕饮用水MCLs)、八个(林丹土壤RGVs)甚至九个(狄氏剂土壤RGVs)数量级。应用人类健康风险不确定性界限和隐含的总暴露质量负担模型来分析用于人类健康风险控制的最常监管和使用的农药。对于土壤中最常监管的27种农药,至少有300个RGVs(占总数的8%)高于所有计算出的人类健康风险不确定性上限。对于饮用水中最常监管的29种农药,至少有172个饮用水MCLs(占总数的5%)超过计算出的人类健康风险不确定性上限;而对于14种使用最广泛的农药,至少有310个计算出的隐含剂量限值(占总数的28.0%)高于可接受的每日摄入量值。结果表明,一些全球标准值在推导时不够保守,无法避免农药对人类健康的风险,而且一些值在计算时没有全面考虑所有主要的人类暴露途径。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/903f/5551264/111a29e92438/ijerph-14-00826-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验