• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

居住土壤中持久性有机污染物(POP)农药最大法定暴露量的健康风险特征描述:分析。

Health risk characterization of maximum legal exposures for persistent organic pollutant (POP) pesticides in residential soil: An analysis.

机构信息

Department of Civil Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA; Parsons Corporation, Chicago, IL, 60606, USA.

出版信息

J Environ Manage. 2018 Jan 1;205:163-173. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.09.070. Epub 2017 Oct 2.

DOI:10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.09.070
PMID:28982065
Abstract

Regulations for pesticides in soil are important for controlling human health risk; humans can be exposed to pesticides by ingesting soil, inhaling soil dust, and through dermal contact. Previous studies focused on analyses of numerical standard values for pesticides and evaluated the same pesticide using different standards among different jurisdictions. To understand the health consequences associated with pesticide soil standard values, lifetime theoretical maximum contribution and risk characterization factors were used in this study to quantify the severity of damage using disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) under the maximum "legal" exposure to persistent organic pollutant (POP) pesticides that are commonly regulated by the Stockholm Convention. Results show that computed soil characterization factors for some pesticides present lognormal distributions, and some of them have DALY values higher than 1000.0 per million population (e.g., the DALY for dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane [DDT] is 14,065 in the Netherlands, which exceeds the tolerable risk of uncertainty upper bound of 1380.0 DALYs). Health risk characterization factors computed from national jurisdictions illustrate that values can vary over eight orders of magnitude. Further, the computed characterization factors can vary over four orders of magnitude within the same national jurisdiction. These data indicate that there is little agreement regarding pesticide soil regulatory guidance values (RGVs) among worldwide national jurisdictions or even RGV standard values within the same jurisdiction. Among these POP pesticides, lindane has the lowest median (0.16 DALYs) and geometric mean (0.28 DALYs) risk characterization factors, indicating that worldwide national jurisdictions provide relatively conservative soil RGVs for lindane. In addition, we found that some European nations and members of the former Union of Soviet Socialist Republics share the same pesticide RGVs and data clusters for the computed characterization factors.

摘要

土壤农药法规对于控制人类健康风险非常重要;人类可以通过摄入土壤、吸入土壤灰尘以及皮肤接触来接触农药。以前的研究主要集中在分析农药的数值标准值上,并使用不同司法管辖区的不同标准来评估同一农药。为了了解与农药土壤标准值相关的健康后果,本研究使用终生理论最大贡献和风险特征因子来量化使用持久性有机污染物(POP)农药最大“法定”暴露下残疾调整生命年(DALY)的损害严重程度,这些农药通常受《斯德哥尔摩公约》管制。结果表明,一些农药的计算土壤特征因子呈对数正态分布,其中一些的 DALY 值高于 1000.0/百万人口(例如,荷兰的滴滴涕(DDT)的 DALY 值为 14065,超过了 1380.0 DALY 的可容忍不确定性上限风险)。来自国家司法管辖区的健康风险特征因子表明,这些值在八个数量级上有所不同。此外,在同一国家司法管辖区内,计算出的特征因子在四个数量级上也有所不同。这些数据表明,全世界各国司法管辖区之间,甚至同一司法管辖区内的农药土壤监管指导值(RGV)之间几乎没有一致性。在这些 POP 农药中,林丹的中位(0.16 DALY)和几何平均值(0.28 DALY)风险特征因子最低,表明全世界各国司法管辖区为林丹提供了相对保守的土壤 RGV。此外,我们发现一些欧洲国家和前苏联成员国共享相同的农药 RGV 和计算特征因子的数据群。

相似文献

1
Health risk characterization of maximum legal exposures for persistent organic pollutant (POP) pesticides in residential soil: An analysis.居住土壤中持久性有机污染物(POP)农药最大法定暴露量的健康风险特征描述:分析。
J Environ Manage. 2018 Jan 1;205:163-173. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.09.070. Epub 2017 Oct 2.
2
Residential surface soil guidance values applied worldwide to the original 2001 Stockholm Convention POP pesticides.全球范围内应用于原始 2001 年斯德哥尔摩公约持久性有机污染物农药的住宅地表土壤指导值。
J Environ Manage. 2015 Sep 1;160:16-29. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.06.001. Epub 2015 Jun 12.
3
Worldwide Regulations of Standard Values of Pesticides for Human Health Risk Control: A Review.全球农药人体健康风险控制标准值法规综述
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Jul 22;14(7):826. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14070826.
4
Residential surface soil guidance applied worldwide to the pesticides added to the Stockholm Convention in 2009 and 2011.住宅地表土壤指导方针在全球范围内适用于 2009 年和 2011 年加入《斯德哥尔摩公约》的农药。
J Environ Manage. 2015 Sep 1;160:226-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.06.020. Epub 2015 Jul 3.
5
Global variations in pesticide regulations and health risk assessment of maximum concentration levels in drinking water.全球农药法规的差异及饮用水中最大浓度水平的健康风险评估。
J Environ Manage. 2018 Apr 15;212:384-394. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.12.083. Epub 2018 Feb 22.
6
The use of a disability-adjusted life-year (DALY) metric to measure human health damage resulting from pesticide maximum legal exposures.利用伤残调整生命年(DALY)指标衡量因农药最大法定暴露而导致的人类健康损害。
Sci Total Environ. 2018 Oct 15;639:438-456. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.05.148. Epub 2018 May 26.
7
Scope of the worldwide effort to regulate pesticide contamination in surface soils.全球范围内管控地表土壤中农药污染的努力范围。
J Environ Manage. 2014 Dec 15;146:420-443. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.07.020. Epub 2014 Sep 8.
8
A standard-value-based comparison tool to analyze U.S. soil regulations for the top 100 concerned pollutants.一个基于标准值的比较工具,用于分析美国针对前 100 种关注污染物的土壤法规。
Sci Total Environ. 2019 Jan 10;647:663-675. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.08.001. Epub 2018 Aug 4.
9
Organochlorine pesticides contamination in surface soils from two pesticide factories in Southeast China.中国东南部两家农药厂周边表层土壤中的有机氯农药污染
Chemosphere. 2009 Oct;77(5):628-33. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2009.08.055. Epub 2009 Sep 20.
10
A Bayesian generalized log-normal model to dynamically evaluate the distribution of pesticide residues in soil associated with population health risks.贝叶斯广义对数正态模型,用于动态评估与人群健康风险相关的土壤中农药残留的分布。
Environ Int. 2018 Dec;121(Pt 1):620-634. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2018.09.054. Epub 2018 Oct 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Detoxification and catabolism of mesotrione and fomesafen facilitated by a Phase II reaction acetyltransferase in rice.通过水稻中 II 相反应乙酰基转移酶促进了麦草畏和氟磺胺草醚的解毒和分解代谢。
J Adv Res. 2023 Sep;51:1-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jare.2022.12.002. Epub 2022 Dec 7.
2
CRISPR-Based Genome Editing: Advancements and Opportunities for Rice Improvement.基于 CRISPR 的基因组编辑:水稻改良的进展和机遇。
Int J Mol Sci. 2022 Apr 18;23(8):4454. doi: 10.3390/ijms23084454.
3
A Pest or Otherwise? Encounter of (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) with Persistent Organic Pollutants.
害虫与否?金龟子(鞘翅目:金龟科)与持久性有机污染物的接触
Insects. 2021 Sep 12;12(9):818. doi: 10.3390/insects12090818.
4
Improved plant bioconcentration modeling of pesticides: The role of periderm dynamics.改进农药的植物生物浓缩模型:周皮动态的作用。
Pest Manag Sci. 2021 Nov;77(11):5096-5108. doi: 10.1002/ps.6549. Epub 2021 Jul 22.
5
Evolution and Application of Genome Editing Techniques for Achieving Food and Nutritional Security.基因组编辑技术的演进及其在实现粮食和营养安全方面的应用。
Int J Mol Sci. 2021 May 25;22(11):5585. doi: 10.3390/ijms22115585.
6
Chlorpyrifos degradation efficiency of sp. laccase immobilized on iron magnetic nanoparticles.固定在铁磁性纳米颗粒上的某漆酶对毒死蜱的降解效率
3 Biotech. 2020 Aug;10(8):366. doi: 10.1007/s13205-020-02363-6. Epub 2020 Aug 1.
7
Study of organochlorine pesticides and heavy metals in soils of the Juarez valley: an important agricultural region between Mexico and the USA.研究华雷斯谷地土壤中的有机氯农药和重金属:美墨边境的一个重要农业区。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2019 Dec;26(36):36401-36409. doi: 10.1007/s11356-019-06724-4. Epub 2019 Nov 13.
8
Applications of the CRISPR/Cas9 System for Rice Grain Quality Improvement: Perspectives and Opportunities.CRISPR/Cas9 系统在稻米品质改良中的应用:展望与机遇。
Int J Mol Sci. 2019 Feb 19;20(4):888. doi: 10.3390/ijms20040888.
9
Endocrine disrupting pesticides in soil and their health risk through ingestion of vegetables grown in Pakistan.土壤中的内分泌干扰性农药及其通过食用巴基斯坦种植的蔬菜对健康造成的风险。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2019 Mar;26(9):8808-8820. doi: 10.1007/s11356-019-04287-y. Epub 2019 Feb 2.
10
Exposure to Mercury in Workers and the Population Surrounding Gold Mining Areas in the Mojana Region, Colombia.哥伦比亚莫霍纳地区金矿周边地区工人和居民接触汞的情况。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Oct 23;15(11):2337. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15112337.