Department of Radiology, Peking University Fourth School of Clinical Medicine, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Xicheng District, Beijing, China.
Department of Epidemiology, Peking University Fourth School of Clinical Medicine, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Xicheng District, Beijing, China.
Sci Rep. 2017 Jul 24;7(1):6284. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-06608-y.
Asynchronous calibration quantitative computed tomography (QCT) is a new tool that allows the quantification of bone mineral density (BMD) without the use of a calibration phantom during scanning; however, this tool is not fully validated for clinical use. We used the European spine phantom (ESP) with repositioning during scanning and assessed the accuracy and short-term reproducibility of asynchronous QCT. Intra-scanner and intra-observer precision were each calculated as the root mean square of the standard deviation (RMSSD) and the coefficient of variation (CV-RMSSD). We also compared asynchronous and conventional QCT results in 50 clinical subjects. The accuracy of asynchronous QCT for three ESP vertebrae ranged from 1.4-6.7%, whereas intra-scanner precision for these vertebrae ranged from 0.53-0.91 mg/cc. Asynchronous QCT was most precise for a trabecular BMD of 100 mg/cc (CV-RMSSD = 0.2%). For intra-observer variability, overall precision error was smaller than 3%. In clinical subjects there was excellent agreement between the two calibration methods with correlation coefficients ranging from 0.96-0.99. A Bland-Altman analysis demonstrated that methodological differences depended on the magnitude of the BMD variable. Our findings indicate that the asynchronous QCT has good accuracy and precision for assessing trabecular BMD in the spine.
异步校准定量 CT(QCT)是一种新工具,它允许在扫描过程中不使用校准体模即可定量骨矿物质密度(BMD);然而,该工具尚未完全验证可用于临床。我们在扫描过程中使用了欧洲脊柱体模(ESP)并重新定位,并评估了异步 QCT 的准确性和短期可重复性。扫描仪内和观察者内精度分别计算为标准偏差的均方根(RMSSD)和变异系数(CV-RMSSD)。我们还比较了 50 例临床患者的异步和常规 QCT 结果。三个 ESP 椎体的异步 QCT 准确性范围为 1.4-6.7%,而这些椎体的扫描仪内精度范围为 0.53-0.91mg/cc。对于 100mg/cc 的骨小梁 BMD,异步 QCT 最精确(CV-RMSSD=0.2%)。对于观察者内可变性,总体精度误差小于 3%。在临床患者中,两种校准方法之间具有极好的一致性,相关系数范围为 0.96-0.99。Bland-Altman 分析表明,方法学差异取决于 BMD 变量的大小。我们的研究结果表明,异步 QCT 在评估脊柱骨小梁 BMD 方面具有良好的准确性和精密度。