Gonzalez Araceli, Rozenman Michelle, Langley Audra K, Kendall Philip C, Ginsburg Golda S, Compton Scott, Walkup John T, Birmaher Boris, Albano Anne Marie, Piacentini John
California State University, Long Beach, Department of Psychology.
University of California, Los Angeles Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, Division of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry.
Child Youth Care Forum. 2017 Jun;46(3):395-412. doi: 10.1007/s10566-016-9381-y. Epub 2016 Nov 24.
Anxiety disorders are among the most common mental health problems in youth, and faulty interpretation bias has been positively linked to anxiety severity, even within anxiety-disordered youth. Quick, reliable assessment of interpretation bias may be useful in identifying youth with certain types of anxiety or assessing changes on cognitive bias during intervention.
This study examined the factor structure, reliability, and validity of the Self-report of Ambiguous Social Situations for Youth (SASSY) scale, a self-report measure developed to assess interpretation bias in youth.
Participants (N=488, age 7 to 17) met diagnostic criteria for Social Phobia, Generalized Anxiety Disorder, and/or Separation Anxiety Disorder. An exploratory factor analysis was performed on baseline data from youth participating in a large randomized clinical trial.
Exploratory factor analysis yielded two factors (Accusation/Blame, Social Rejection). The SASSY full scale and Social Rejection factor demonstrated adequate internal consistency, convergent validity with social anxiety, and discriminant validity as evidenced by non-significant correlations with measures of non-social anxiety. Further, the SASSY Social Rejection factor accurately distinguished children and adolescents with Social Phobia from those with other anxiety disorders, supporting its criterion validity, and revealed sensitivity to changes with treatment. Given the relevance to youth with social phobia, pre- and post-intervention data were examined for youth social phobia to test sensitivity to treatment effects; results suggested that SASSY scores reduced for treatment responders.
Findings suggest the potential utility of the SASSY Social Rejection factor as a quick, reliable, and efficient way of assessing interpretation bias in anxious youth, particularly as related to social concerns, in research and clinical settings.
焦虑症是青少年中最常见的心理健康问题之一,错误的解释偏差与焦虑严重程度呈正相关,即使在患有焦虑症的青少年中也是如此。快速、可靠地评估解释偏差可能有助于识别患有特定类型焦虑症的青少年,或评估干预期间认知偏差的变化。
本研究考察了青少年模糊社交情境自我报告量表(SASSY)的因子结构、信度和效度,该量表是一种为评估青少年解释偏差而开发的自我报告测量工具。
参与者(N = 488,年龄7至17岁)符合社交恐惧症、广泛性焦虑症和/或分离焦虑症的诊断标准。对参与一项大型随机临床试验的青少年的基线数据进行探索性因子分析。
探索性因子分析产生了两个因子(指责/归咎、社交拒绝)。SASSY全量表和社交拒绝因子显示出足够的内部一致性、与社交焦虑的收敛效度,以及与非社交焦虑测量指标无显著相关性所证明的区分效度。此外,SASSY社交拒绝因子准确地区分了患有社交恐惧症的儿童和青少年与患有其他焦虑症的儿童和青少年,支持了其效标效度,并显示出对治疗变化的敏感性。鉴于与社交恐惧症青少年的相关性,对社交恐惧症青少年的干预前后数据进行了检查,以测试对治疗效果的敏感性;结果表明,治疗有反应者的SASSY分数降低。
研究结果表明,SASSY社交拒绝因子在研究和临床环境中,可能是一种快速、可靠且有效的方法,用于评估焦虑青少年的解释偏差,特别是与社交问题相关的偏差。