Micheli Laura, Ceccarelli Manuela, Gioia Roberta, D'Andrea Giorgio, Farioli-Vecchioli Stefano, Costanzi Marco, Saraulli Daniele, Cestari Vincenzo, Tirone Felice
Institute of Cell Biology and Neurobiology, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche (CNR), Fondazione Santa Lucia (IRCCS)Rome, Italy.
Department of Human Sciences, Libera Università Maria SS. Assunta (LUMSA)Rome, Italy.
Front Cell Neurosci. 2017 Jul 10;11:186. doi: 10.3389/fncel.2017.00186. eCollection 2017.
Cell proliferation and differentiation are interdependent processes. Here, we have asked to what extent the two processes of neural progenitor cell amplification and differentiation are functionally separated. Thus, we analyzed whether it is possible to rescue a defect of terminal differentiation in progenitor cells of the dentate gyrus, where new neurons are generated throughout life, by inducing their proliferation and/or their differentiation with different stimuli appropriately timed. As a model we used the Tis21 knockout mouse, whose dentate gyrus neurons, as demonstrated by us and others, have an intrinsic defect of terminal differentiation. We first tested the effect of two proliferative as well as differentiative neurogenic stimuli, one pharmacological (fluoxetine), the other cognitive (the Morris water maze (MWM) training). Both effectively enhanced the number of new dentate gyrus neurons produced, and fluoxetine also reduced the S-phase length of Tis21 knockout dentate gyrus progenitor cells and increased the rate of differentiation of control cells, but neither factor enhanced the defective rate of differentiation. In contrast, the defect of terminal differentiation was fully rescued by infection of proliferating dentate gyrus progenitor cells with retroviruses either silencing Id3, an inhibitor of neural differentiation, or expressing NeuroD2, a proneural gene expressed in terminally differentiated dentate gyrus neurons. This is the first demonstration that NeuroD2 or the silencing of Id3 can activate the differentiation of dentate gyrus neurons, complementing a defect of differentiation. It also highlights how the rate of differentiation of dentate gyrus neurons is regulated genetically at several levels and that a neurogenic stimulus for amplification of neural stem/progenitor cells may not be sufficient in itself to modify this rate.
细胞增殖和分化是相互依存的过程。在此,我们探讨了神经祖细胞扩增和分化这两个过程在功能上的分离程度。因此,我们分析了通过适时给予不同刺激来诱导齿状回祖细胞增殖和/或分化,是否有可能挽救其终末分化缺陷,齿状回在整个生命过程中都会产生新的神经元。我们使用了Tis21基因敲除小鼠作为模型,正如我们和其他人所证明的,其齿状回神经元存在终末分化的内在缺陷。我们首先测试了两种增殖性和分化性神经源性刺激的效果,一种是药物性的(氟西汀),另一种是认知性的(莫里斯水迷宫(MWM)训练)。两者均有效增加了新产生的齿状回神经元数量,氟西汀还缩短了Tis21基因敲除小鼠齿状回祖细胞的S期长度,并提高了对照细胞的分化速率,但两者均未提高缺陷分化率。相比之下,通过用逆转录病毒感染增殖的齿状回祖细胞,沉默神经分化抑制剂Id3或表达在终末分化的齿状回神经元中表达的神经源性基因NeuroD2,可完全挽救终末分化缺陷。这是首次证明NeuroD2或Id3的沉默可激活齿状回神经元的分化,弥补分化缺陷。这也突出了齿状回神经元的分化速率在多个水平上是如何受到基因调控的,以及神经干细胞/祖细胞扩增的神经源性刺激本身可能不足以改变这一速率。