Research Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, UCL, London, UK.
Behavioural and Brain Science Unit, Institute of Child Health, UCL, London, UK.
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2017 Oct;58(10):1166-1175. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.12785. Epub 2017 Jul 25.
Social (pragmatic) communication disorder (SPCD) is a new diagnosis introduced by DSM-5, characterised by problems with verbal and nonverbal social communication. It is currently unclear whether SPCD is a valid diagnostic category, because little is known about the characteristics of those who meet its criteria. We sought to identify and describe cases of SPCD, to contribute to debates about its validity. We investigated whether the symptoms of SPCD cluster together to form a coherent syndrome that is distinct from autism spectrum disorder (ASD) in terms of its core and associated features.
Participants were young people (N = 1,081, age range = 4-18 years) who had attended a specialist social communication disorders clinic for children with fluent language and normal-range intelligence. Standardised parent-report data were collected using the Developmental, Dimensional and Diagnostic Interview (3Di), Child Communication Checklist (CCC) and Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ). An algorithm was designed using 3Di and CCC items to implement DSM-5 SPCD criteria.
Eighty-eight young people met our criteria for SPCD, with 801 meeting DSM-5 ASD criteria and the remaining 192 having neither SPCD nor ASD ('clinical comparison group'). The core symptoms of SPCD co-occurred to a moderate degree (average interitem correlation = .22). SPCD cases had autistic social difficulties that were intermediate between ASD and the clinical comparison group. SPCD was associated with high rates of nonautistic psychopathology, with 63.5% scoring in the abnormal range of the SDQ's Total Problems scale.
We did not find evidence that SPCD is qualitatively distinct from ASD. Rather, it appears to lie on the borderlands of the autism spectrum, describing those with autistic traits that fall just below the threshold for an ASD diagnosis. SPCD may have clinical utility for identifying people with autistic traits that are insufficiently severe for ASD diagnosis, but who nevertheless require support.
社会(语用)沟通障碍(SPCD)是 DSM-5 引入的一个新诊断,其特征是言语和非言语社会沟通方面存在问题。目前尚不清楚 SPCD 是否是一个有效的诊断类别,因为人们对符合其标准的人的特征知之甚少。我们试图确定和描述 SPCD 的病例,为其有效性的争论做出贡献。我们研究了 SPCD 的症状是否聚集在一起,形成一个与自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)在其核心和相关特征方面不同的连贯综合征。
参与者是参加儿童言语流畅性和正常智力水平的专门社交沟通障碍诊所的年轻人(N=1081,年龄范围=4-18 岁)。使用发展、维度和诊断访谈(3Di)、儿童沟通检查表(CCC)和困难问卷(SDQ)收集标准化的父母报告数据。使用 3Di 和 CCC 项目设计了一个算法来实施 DSM-5 SPCD 标准。
88 名年轻人符合我们的 SPCD 标准,801 名符合 DSM-5 ASD 标准,其余 192 名既不符合 SPCD 也不符合 ASD(“临床对照组”)。SPCD 的核心症状中度共存(平均项目间相关性=.22)。SPCD 病例的自闭症社交困难介于 ASD 和临床对照组之间。SPCD 与非自闭症精神病理学的高发生率相关,63.5%的人在 SDQ 总问题量表的异常范围内得分。
我们没有发现 SPCD 在质量上与 ASD 不同的证据。相反,它似乎位于自闭症谱系的边界,描述了那些具有低于 ASD 诊断阈值的自闭症特征的人。SPCD 可能具有用于识别自闭症特征不足严重到需要 ASD 诊断但仍需要支持的人的临床效用。