• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

贝叶斯一步法 IPD 网络荟萃分析使用 Royston-Parmar 模型的生存数据。

Bayesian one-step IPD network meta-analysis of time-to-event data using Royston-Parmar models.

机构信息

MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, Aviation House, 125 Kingsway, London, WC2B 6NH, UK.

Department of Health Sciences, Univeristy of Leicester, University Road, Leicester, LE1 7RH, UK.

出版信息

Res Synth Methods. 2017 Dec;8(4):451-464. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1253. Epub 2017 Jul 25.

DOI:10.1002/jrsm.1253
PMID:28742955
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5724680/
Abstract

Network meta-analysis (NMA) combines direct and indirect evidence from trials to calculate and rank treatment estimates. While modelling approaches for continuous and binary outcomes are relatively well developed, less work has been done with time-to-event outcomes. Such outcomes are usually analysed using Cox proportional hazard (PH) models. However, in oncology with longer follow-up time, and time-dependent effects of targeted treatments, this may no longer be appropriate. Network meta-analysis conducted in the Bayesian setting has been increasing in popularity. However, fitting the Cox model is computationally intensive, making it unsuitable for many datasets. Royston-Parmar models are a flexible alternative that can accommodate time-dependent effects. Motivated by individual participant data (IPD) from 37 cervical cancer trials (5922 women) comparing surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy, this paper develops an IPD Royston-Parmar Bayesian NMA model for overall survival. We give WinBUGS code for the model. We show how including a treatment-ln(time) interaction can be used to conduct a global test for PH, illustrate how to test for consistency of direct and indirect evidence, and assess within-design heterogeneity. Our approach provides a computationally practical, flexible Bayesian approach to NMA of IPD survival data, which readily extends to include additional complexities, such as non-PH, increasingly found in oncology trials.

摘要

网络荟萃分析(NMA)结合了试验中的直接和间接证据,以计算和排列治疗估计值。虽然连续和二分类结局的建模方法相对完善,但针对生存时间结局的研究较少。此类结局通常使用 Cox 比例风险(PH)模型进行分析。然而,在肿瘤学中,随访时间较长,且靶向治疗的作用随时间变化,这种方法可能不再适用。基于贝叶斯框架的 NMA 越来越受欢迎。然而,Cox 模型的拟合计算量很大,使其不适合许多数据集。Royston-Parmar 模型是一种灵活的替代方法,可以适应随时间变化的效应。受 37 项比较手术、放疗和化疗的宫颈癌试验(5922 名女性)的个体参与者数据(IPD)的启发,本文开发了一个用于总体生存的 IPD Royston-Parmar 贝叶斯 NMA 模型。我们提供了用于该模型的 WinBUGS 代码。我们展示了如何使用治疗-ln(时间)交互来进行 PH 的全局检验,说明了如何检验直接和间接证据的一致性,并评估了设计内异质性。我们的方法为 IPD 生存数据的 NMA 提供了一种计算实用、灵活的贝叶斯方法,它可以很容易地扩展到包括其他复杂性,如非 PH,这些在肿瘤学试验中越来越常见。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef8f/5724680/e6f19552c8ab/JRSM-8-451-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef8f/5724680/cd2fd92b0466/JRSM-8-451-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef8f/5724680/252151fde328/JRSM-8-451-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef8f/5724680/1173b8d0b82d/JRSM-8-451-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef8f/5724680/f5aa396be8ad/JRSM-8-451-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef8f/5724680/e6f19552c8ab/JRSM-8-451-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef8f/5724680/cd2fd92b0466/JRSM-8-451-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef8f/5724680/252151fde328/JRSM-8-451-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef8f/5724680/1173b8d0b82d/JRSM-8-451-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef8f/5724680/f5aa396be8ad/JRSM-8-451-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef8f/5724680/e6f19552c8ab/JRSM-8-451-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Bayesian one-step IPD network meta-analysis of time-to-event data using Royston-Parmar models.贝叶斯一步法 IPD 网络荟萃分析使用 Royston-Parmar 模型的生存数据。
Res Synth Methods. 2017 Dec;8(4):451-464. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1253. Epub 2017 Jul 25.
2
Assessing the comparative effects of interventions in COPD: a tutorial on network meta-analysis for clinicians.评估慢性阻塞性肺疾病干预措施的比较效果:面向临床医生的网状Meta分析教程
Respir Res. 2024 Dec 21;25(1):438. doi: 10.1186/s12931-024-03056-x.
3
Interventions for central serous chorioretinopathy: a network meta-analysis.中心性浆液性脉络膜视网膜病变的干预措施:一项网状Meta分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jun 16;6(6):CD011841. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011841.pub3.
4
Antiepileptic drug monotherapy for epilepsy: a network meta-analysis of individual participant data.抗癫痫药物单药治疗癫痫:一项个体参与者数据的网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Apr 1;4(4):CD011412. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011412.pub4.
5
Drugs for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting in adults after general anaesthesia: a network meta-analysis.成人全身麻醉后预防术后恶心呕吐的药物:网状Meta分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Oct 19;10(10):CD012859. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012859.pub2.
6
Systemic treatments for metastatic cutaneous melanoma.转移性皮肤黑色素瘤的全身治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 6;2(2):CD011123. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011123.pub2.
7
Optimisation of chemotherapy and radiotherapy for untreated Hodgkin lymphoma patients with respect to second malignant neoplasms, overall and progression-free survival: individual participant data analysis.未治疗的霍奇金淋巴瘤患者化疗和放疗在第二原发性恶性肿瘤、总生存期和无进展生存期方面的优化:个体参与者数据分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Sep 13;9(9):CD008814. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008814.pub2.
8
Challenges of modelling approaches for network meta-analysis of time-to-event outcomes in the presence of non-proportional hazards to aid decision making: Application to a melanoma network.存在非比例风险时用于事件发生时间结局的网络荟萃分析的建模方法在辅助决策方面面临的挑战:应用于黑色素瘤网络。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2022 May;31(5):839-861. doi: 10.1177/09622802211070253. Epub 2022 Jan 19.
9
Antiepileptic drug monotherapy for epilepsy: a network meta-analysis of individual participant data.癫痫的抗癫痫药物单药治疗:个体参与者数据的网状Meta分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jun 29;6(6):CD011412. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011412.pub2.
10
Antiepileptic drug monotherapy for epilepsy: a network meta-analysis of individual participant data.癫痫的抗癫痫药物单药治疗:个体参与者数据的网状荟萃分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 15;12(12):CD011412. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011412.pub3.

引用本文的文献

1
Network Meta-Analysis With Individual Participant-Level Data of Time-to-Event Outcomes Using Cox Regression.使用Cox回归对事件发生时间结局的个体参与者水平数据进行网络Meta分析。
Stat Med. 2025 Feb 28;44(5):e70027. doi: 10.1002/sim.70027.
2
Balancing Efficacy and Tolerability of First-Line Systemic Therapies for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Network Meta-Analysis.晚期肝细胞癌一线全身治疗的疗效与耐受性平衡:一项网状Meta分析
Liver Cancer. 2023 Jul 25;13(2):169-180. doi: 10.1159/000531744. eCollection 2024 Apr.
3
Bayesian hierarchical model-based network meta-analysis to overcome survival extrapolation challenges caused by data immaturity.

本文引用的文献

1
Meta-analytical methods to identify who benefits most from treatments: daft, deluded, or deft approach?用于确定谁能从治疗中获益最多的荟萃分析方法:愚蠢、妄想还是巧妙的方法?
BMJ. 2017 Mar 3;356:j573. doi: 10.1136/bmj.j573.
2
Bayesian bivariate meta-analysis of correlated effects: Impact of the prior distributions on the between-study correlation, borrowing of strength, and joint inferences.相关效应的贝叶斯双变量荟萃分析:先验分布对研究间相关性、信息借用及联合推断的影响。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2018 Feb;27(2):428-450. doi: 10.1177/0962280216631361. Epub 2016 Mar 17.
3
Comparison of Treatment Effects Measured by the Hazard Ratio and by the Ratio of Restricted Mean Survival Times in Oncology Randomized Controlled Trials.
基于贝叶斯层次模型的网络荟萃分析克服数据不成熟导致的生存外推挑战。
J Comp Eff Res. 2023 Mar;12(3):e220159. doi: 10.2217/cer-2022-0159. Epub 2023 Jan 18.
4
A network meta-analysis of immunotherapy-based treatments for advanced nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer.免疫治疗晚期非鳞状非小细胞肺癌的网络荟萃分析。
J Comp Eff Res. 2023 Feb;12(2):e220016. doi: 10.2217/cer-2022-0016. Epub 2023 Jan 9.
5
A systematic review and network meta-analysis of first-line immune checkpoint inhibitor combination therapies in patients with advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer.系统评价和网络荟萃分析一线免疫检查点抑制剂联合治疗晚期非鳞状非小细胞肺癌患者。
Front Immunol. 2022 Oct 26;13:948597. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.948597. eCollection 2022.
6
Using individual participant data to improve network meta-analysis projects.利用个体参与者数据改进网络荟萃分析项目。
BMJ Evid Based Med. 2023 Jun;28(3):197-203. doi: 10.1136/bmjebm-2022-111931. Epub 2022 Aug 10.
7
Challenges of modelling approaches for network meta-analysis of time-to-event outcomes in the presence of non-proportional hazards to aid decision making: Application to a melanoma network.存在非比例风险时用于事件发生时间结局的网络荟萃分析的建模方法在辅助决策方面面临的挑战:应用于黑色素瘤网络。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2022 May;31(5):839-861. doi: 10.1177/09622802211070253. Epub 2022 Jan 19.
8
A frequentist one-step model for a simple network meta-analysis of time-to-event data in presence of an effect modifier.存在效应修饰时,简单网络荟萃分析中事件时间数据的频繁主义一步模型。
PLoS One. 2021 Nov 1;16(11):e0259121. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0259121. eCollection 2021.
9
Individual Patient Data Meta-Analysis and Network Meta-Analysis.个体患者数据荟萃分析和网络荟萃分析。
Methods Mol Biol. 2022;2345:279-298. doi: 10.1007/978-1-0716-1566-9_17.
10
Antihypertensive treatment and risk of cancer: an individual participant data meta-analysis.抗高血压治疗与癌症风险:一项个体参与者数据荟萃分析。
Lancet Oncol. 2021 Apr;22(4):558-570. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(21)00033-4.
肿瘤学随机对照试验中风险比和受限平均生存时间比测量的治疗效果比较。
J Clin Oncol. 2016 May 20;34(15):1813-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.64.2488. Epub 2016 Feb 16.
4
Augmenting the logrank test in the design of clinical trials in which non-proportional hazards of the treatment effect may be anticipated.在可能预期治疗效果存在非比例风险的临床试验设计中增强对数秩检验。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2016 Feb 11;16:16. doi: 10.1186/s12874-016-0110-x.
5
Meta-analysis of time-to-event outcomes from randomized trials using restricted mean survival time: application to individual participant data.使用受限平均生存时间对随机试验的事件发生时间结局进行Meta分析:应用于个体参与者数据。
Stat Med. 2015 Sep 20;34(21):2881-98. doi: 10.1002/sim.6556. Epub 2015 Jun 23.
6
Network meta-analysis of individual and aggregate level data.个体水平和汇总水平数据的网络荟萃分析。
Res Synth Methods. 2012 Jun;3(2):177-90. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1048.
7
Network meta-analysis of parametric survival curves.参数生存曲线的网络荟萃分析。
Res Synth Methods. 2010 Jul;1(3-4):258-71. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.25. Epub 2011 Mar 11.
8
Network meta-analysis of (individual patient) time to event data alongside (aggregate) count data.(个体患者)事件发生时间数据与(汇总)计数数据的网状Meta分析。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014 Sep 10;14:105. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-14-105.
9
Multilevel mixed effects parametric survival models using adaptive Gauss-Hermite quadrature with application to recurrent events and individual participant data meta-analysis.使用自适应 Gauss-Hermite 求积的多层次混合效应参数生存模型及其在复发事件和个体参与者数据荟萃分析中的应用。
Stat Med. 2014 Sep 28;33(22):3844-58. doi: 10.1002/sim.6191. Epub 2014 May 1.
10
Methods used to conduct and report Bayesian mixed treatment comparisons published in the medical literature: a systematic review.方法用于进行和报告贝叶斯混合治疗比较发表在医学文献:系统评价。
BMJ Open. 2013 Jul 21;3(7). doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003111. Print 2013.