Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
J Nucl Med. 2018 Feb;59(2):204-209. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.117.195644. Epub 2017 Jul 26.
The benefit of adding sentinel node biopsy (SNB) to extended pelvic lymph node dissection (ePLND) remains controversial. The aim of our study was to evaluate biochemical recurrence (BCR) after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy and ePLND in prostate cancer patients, stratified by the application of SNB. The results were compared with the predictions of the updated Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center nomogram. Between January 2006 and November 2016, 920 patients underwent robot-assisted radical prostatectomy and ePLND with or without SNB (184 and 736 patients, respectively). BCR was defined as 2 consecutive prostate-specific antigen rises of at least 0.2 ng/mL. The Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression analyses were used to identify predictors of BCR. Median follow-up was 28 mo (interquartile range, 13-56.7 mo). The 5-y BCR-free survival rate was 80.5% and 69.9% in the ePLND+SNB and ePLND groups, respectively. At multivariate analysis, prostate-specific antigen level, primary Gleason grade greater than 3, seminal vesicle invasion, and higher number of removed and positive nodes were independent predictors of BCR in the ePLND group. In the ePLND+SNB group, only the number of positive nodes was an independent predictor of BCR. The overall accuracy of the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center nomogram was higher in the ePLND+SNB than in the ePLND group. However, the nomogram was underestimating the probability of BCR-free status in the ePLND+SNB group, whereas the ePLND group was performing as predicted. Adding SNB to ePLND improves BCR-free survival, although the precise explanation of this observation remains speculative. Our results should be interpreted cautiously, given the nonrandomized nature and the selection bias of the study.
在扩大盆腔淋巴结清扫术(ePLND)中加入前哨淋巴结活检(SNB)的益处仍存在争议。本研究的目的是评估前列腺癌患者接受机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术和 ePLND 后,根据 SNB 的应用情况,生化复发(BCR)的情况。并将结果与更新的 Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center 列线图的预测值进行比较。
2006 年 1 月至 2016 年 11 月,920 例患者接受了机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术和 ePLND,其中 SNB 应用于 184 例患者,736 例患者未应用 SNB。BCR 定义为连续 2 次前列腺特异性抗原升高,至少 0.2ng/ml。使用 Kaplan-Meier 方法和 Cox 回归分析来确定 BCR 的预测因子。
中位随访时间为 28 个月(四分位距,13-56.7 个月)。在 ePLND+SNB 组和 ePLND 组中,5 年 BCR 无复发生存率分别为 80.5%和 69.9%。多变量分析显示,前列腺特异性抗原水平、原发 Gleason 评分大于 3、精囊侵犯以及切除和阳性淋巴结的数量是 ePLND 组 BCR 的独立预测因子。在 ePLND+SNB 组中,只有阳性淋巴结的数量是 BCR 的独立预测因子。在 ePLND+SNB 组中,Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center 列线图的整体准确性高于 ePLND 组。然而,该列线图低估了 ePLND+SNB 组中无 BCR 状态的概率,而 ePLND 组的表现则符合预测值。
在 ePLND 中加入 SNB 可提高 BCR 无复发生存率,尽管这一观察结果的确切解释仍存在推测。考虑到研究的非随机性和选择偏倚,应谨慎解释我们的结果。