Xu Cailong, Huang Shoubing, Tian Beijing, Ren Jianhong, Meng Qingfeng, Wang Pu
College of Agronomy and Biotechnology, China Agricultural UniversityBeijing, China.
Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural SciencesBeijing, China.
Front Plant Sci. 2017 Jul 12;8:1234. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.01234. eCollection 2017.
Relatively low nitrogen (N) efficiency and heavy environmental costs caused by excessive N fertilizer applications with outdated fertilization techniques are current cultivation production problems with maize among smallholders in North China Plain. Although many studies have examined agronomical strategies for improving yields and N use, the integrated effects of these measures and the associated environmental costs are not well understood. We conducted a 2-year field study with two densities (67,500 plants ha, which was similar to local farmers' practices, and 90,000 plants ha) and three N rates (0, 180, and 360 kg ha, the rate local farmers' commonly apply) to test the integrated effects for maize production at Wuqiao experimental station in North China Plain. The higher planting density produced significant increases in grain yield (GY), N use efficiency (NUE), agronomic N efficiency (AEN), and N partial productivity (PFP) by 6.6, 3.9, 24.7, and 8.8%, respectively; in addition, NO emission and greenhouse gas intensity decreased by 7.3 and 4.3%, respectively. With a lower N application rate, from 360 to 180 kg ha, GY was unchanged, and NUE, AEN, and PFP all significantly increased by 6.2, 96.0, and 98.7%, respectively; in addition, NO emission and greenhouse gas intensity decreased by 61.5 and 46.2%, respectively. The optimized N rate (180 kg N ha) for the 90,000 plants ha treatment achieved the highest yield with only 50% of the N fertilizer input commonly employed by local farmers' (360 kg N ha), which contributed to the increased N-uptake and N-transfer capacity. Therefore, our study demonstrated that agronomical methods such as increasing planting density with reasonable N application could be useful to obtain higher GY along with efficient N management to help lower environmental costs of maize production.
在中国华北平原,小农户种植玉米时,由于施肥技术陈旧,过量施用氮肥导致氮效率相对较低,且环境成本高昂,这是当前种植生产中存在的问题。尽管许多研究探讨了提高产量和氮利用的农艺策略,但这些措施的综合效果以及相关的环境成本仍未得到充分理解。我们在中国华北平原吴桥实验站进行了为期两年的田间试验,设置了两种种植密度(67500株/公顷,与当地农民的种植密度相近;90000株/公顷)和三种施氮量(0、180和360千克/公顷,当地农民常用的施氮量),以测试对玉米生产的综合影响。较高的种植密度使籽粒产量(GY)、氮利用效率(NUE)、农学氮效率(AEN)和氮偏生产力(PFP)分别显著提高了6.6%、3.9%、24.7%和8.8%;此外,一氧化氮排放量和温室气体强度分别降低了7.3%和4.3%。施氮量从360千克/公顷降至180千克/公顷时,籽粒产量不变,但氮利用效率、农学氮效率和氮偏生产力分别显著提高了6.2%、96.0%和98.7%;此外,一氧化氮排放量和温室气体强度分别降低了61.5%和46.2%。对于90000株/公顷的种植处理,优化后的施氮量(180千克氮/公顷)以当地农民常用施氮量(360千克氮/公顷)的50%投入实现了最高产量,这有助于提高氮吸收和氮转运能力。因此,我们的研究表明,诸如合理施氮并增加种植密度等农艺方法,有助于在高效氮管理的同时获得更高的籽粒产量,从而降低玉米生产的环境成本。