Department of Bioscience Research, College of Dentistry, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, 875 Union Avenue, Laboratory, Cancer Research Building, 19 S. Manassas St. Lab Rm 255, office 256, Memphis, TN, 38163, USA.
Department of Periodontics & Endodontics, School of Dental Medicine, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA.
Clin Oral Investig. 2018 Mar;22(2):1055-1061. doi: 10.1007/s00784-017-2187-y. Epub 2017 Jul 26.
This is to compare the volumes of irrigant apically extruded by five irrigation systems in an artificial socket model simulating clinical conditions.
Twenty extracted human single-rooted teeth were enlarged to size 40/04 and then embedded in silicone impression material. The root canal space was irrigated with nominal 3% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) using standard needle irrigation (SNI) with a 30-gauge notched needle, EndoActivator (EA), XP Endo Finisher (XP Endo), EndoVac (EV), and photon-induced photoacoustic streaming (PIPS). Extruded NaOCl was collected, reacted with taurine to form taurine-monochloramine, and absorbance of taurine-monochloramine was measured at 252 nm using a spectrophotometer. The five irrigation systems were compared with repeated measures ANOVA and pairwise comparisons.
The EV group had very low extrusion (mean ± SD = 0.12 ± 0.2 μL) and differed significantly from the other four groups (P ≤ 0.001). Larger volumes of irrigant were extruded in the other irrigation groups. There were no significant differences in the extruded volumes among the SNI (7.4 ± 3.4 μL), EA (7.0 ± 6.1 μL), and XP Endo (7.8 ± 4.1 μL) groups (P = 1). The PIPS group had the highest mean extruded volume (12.9 ± 6.8 μL) and differed significantly from SNI (P = 0.030), EV (P < 0.0005), and EA (P = 0.02), but not XP Endo (P = 0.154).
Under the in vitro conditions of this study, irrigant extrusion appears unavoidable unless negative pressure irrigation such as EV is used. PIPS extrudes more irrigant than other systems, while SNI, EA, and XP Endo extrude similar volumes of irrigant.
The findings help clinicians select the optimal irrigation system to avoid irrigant extrusion.
本研究旨在比较五种冲洗系统在模拟临床条件的人工牙槽模型中根管内冲洗时根尖区冲洗液的溢出量。
将 20 颗人离体单根牙扩大至 40/04 号,并使用硅橡胶印模材料包埋。使用标准的 30 号有槽冲洗针(SNI)、EndoActivator(EA)、XP Endo Finisher(XP Endo)、EndoVac(EV)和光子诱导光声流(PIPS),用 3%次氯酸钠(NaOCl)冲洗根管。收集溢出的 NaOCl,与牛磺酸反应形成牛磺酸-单氯胺,并用分光光度计在 252nm 处测量牛磺酸-单氯胺的吸光度。使用重复测量方差分析和两两比较对这 5 种冲洗系统进行比较。
EV 组的冲洗液溢出量非常低(均值±标准差为 0.12±0.2μL),与其他 4 组有显著差异(P≤0.001)。在其他冲洗组中,冲洗液的溢出量更大。SNI(7.4±3.4μL)、EA(7.0±6.1μL)和 XP Endo(7.8±4.1μL)组之间的冲洗液溢出量无显著差异(P=1)。PIPS 组的平均溢出量最高(12.9±6.8μL),与 SNI(P=0.030)、EV(P<0.0005)和 EA(P=0.02)组有显著差异,但与 XP Endo 组无显著差异(P=0.154)。
在本研究的体外条件下,除非使用 EV 等负压冲洗,否则不可避免会有冲洗液溢出。PIPS 比其他系统溢出更多的冲洗液,而 SNI、EA 和 XP Endo 则溢出相似量的冲洗液。
研究结果有助于临床医生选择最佳的冲洗系统以避免冲洗液溢出。