Mathew Joan, Emil Jonathan, Paulaian Benin, John Bejoy, Raja Jacob, Mathew Jean
Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Rajas Dental College, Tirunelveli District, Tamil Nadu, India.
J Conserv Dent. 2014 Sep;17(5):444-8. doi: 10.4103/0972-0707.139833.
Several disinfection techniques have been recently introduced with the main objective of improving root canal disinfection in the inaccessible areas of the root canal system. This in vitro study was done to evaluate the antimicrobial effect and viability of Enterococcus faecalis biofilms using conventional irrigation, EndoActivator (Dentsply, Tulsa Dental, USA), diode laser irradiation and photon-initiated photoacoustic streaming (PIPS).
Root canals of 130 single rooted mandibular premolars, standardized to a uniform length of 20 mm were instrumented until finishing file, F1 (Universal Protaper Rotary System, Dentsply, Tulsa Dental Specialties, USA). After smear layer removal and sterilization, five teeth were randomly selected to assure sterility before bacterial inoculation. The remaining 125 samples were contaminated with E. faecalis suspension, incubated for 21 days and divided into five groups (n = 25). In Group 1; untreated group (positive control), the root canals were not subjected to any disinfection procedure. Sampling was performed within the canals and the colony-forming unit count was evaluated for 20 samples. Five samples were selected to visualize the pattern of colonization at Level 1 (4 mm from the apex) and Level 2 (1 mm from the apex) by confocal laser scanning microscopy. Samples in Groups 2-5 namely conventional needle irrigation, EndoActivator, diode laser and PIPS were subjected to their respective disinfection procedures. Postdisinfection sample evaluation criteria was followed for all groups as same as that for Group 1.
Diode laser displayed the highest antibacterial efficacy and least viable bacteria than the other three disinfection techniques.
Diode laser group showed better antibacterial efficacy and least viable bacteria when compared to conventional needle irrigation, PIPS and EndoActivator groups in minimally instrumented, experimentally infected root canals.
最近引入了几种消毒技术,主要目的是改善根管系统难以到达区域的根管消毒。本体外研究旨在使用传统冲洗、EndoActivator(美国登士柏 Tulsa 牙科公司)、二极管激光照射和光子引发光声流(PIPS)评估粪肠球菌生物膜的抗菌效果和活力。
选取 130 颗单根下颌前磨牙,将根管标准化至统一长度 20 mm,使用至 F1 锉(美国登士柏 Tulsa 牙科专业公司的通用 ProTaper 旋转系统)进行预备。去除玷污层并灭菌后,随机选择 5 颗牙齿以确保在细菌接种前无菌。其余 125 个样本用粪肠球菌悬液污染,培养 21 天,然后分为五组(n = 25)。第 1 组为未处理组(阳性对照),根管未进行任何消毒程序。在根管内进行采样,并对 20 个样本评估菌落形成单位计数。选择 5 个样本通过共聚焦激光扫描显微镜观察根尖 4 mm 处(第 1 水平)和根尖 1 mm 处(第 2 水平)的定植模式。第 2 - 5 组,即传统针管冲洗、EndoActivator、二极管激光和 PIPS 组,分别进行各自的消毒程序。所有组消毒后样本的评估标准与第 1 组相同。
与其他三种消毒技术相比,二极管激光显示出最高的抗菌效果和最少的活菌。
在轻度预备、实验性感染的根管中,与传统针管冲洗、PIPS 和 EndoActivator 组相比,二极管激光组显示出更好的抗菌效果和最少的活菌。