Needham Belinda L, Mukherjee Bhramar, Bagchi Pramita, Kim Catherine, Mukherjea Arnab, Kandula Namratha R, Kanaya Alka M
Department of Epidemiology and Center for Social Epidemiology and Population Health, University of Michigan, 1415 Washington Heights, 2649A SPH Tower, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109-2029, USA.
Department of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
J Immigr Minor Health. 2018 Aug;20(4):792-798. doi: 10.1007/s10903-017-0635-z.
Using latent class analysis, we previously identified three acculturation strategies employed by South Asian immigrants in the US. Members of the Separation class showed a preference for South Asian culture over US culture, while members of the Assimilation class showed a preference for US culture, and those in the Integration class showed a similar preference for South Asian and US cultures. The purpose of this study was to examine associations between these acculturation strategies and symptoms of depression, a common yet underdiagnosed and undertreated mental disorder. We used data from the Mediators of Atherosclerosis in South Asians Living in America (MASALA) study (n = 856). Data were collected between October 2010 and March 2013 in the San Francisco Bay Area and Chicago. Depressive symptoms were assessed using the CES-D Scale. Applying a simple new method to account for uncertainty in class assignment when modeling latent classes as an exposure, we found that respondents in the Separation class had more depressive symptoms than those in the Integration class, but only after taking into account self-reported social support (b = 0.11; p = 0.05). There were no differences in depressive symptoms among those in the Assimilation class vs. those in the Integration class (b = -0.06; p = 0.41). Social support may protect against elevated symptoms of depression in South Asian immigrants with lower levels of integration into US culture.
我们之前运用潜在类别分析,确定了美国南亚移民采用的三种文化适应策略。分离类别的成员对南亚文化的偏好超过美国文化,同化类别的成员偏好美国文化,而融合类别的成员对南亚文化和美国文化表现出相似的偏好。本研究的目的是检验这些文化适应策略与抑郁症症状之间的关联,抑郁症是一种常见但诊断不足和治疗不足的精神障碍。我们使用了来自“生活在美国的南亚人动脉粥样硬化的中介因素”(MASALA)研究的数据(n = 856)。数据于2010年10月至2013年3月在旧金山湾区和芝加哥收集。使用CES-D量表评估抑郁症状。在将潜在类别作为一种暴露因素进行建模时,应用一种简单的新方法来考虑类别分配中的不确定性,我们发现,分离类别的受访者比融合类别的受访者有更多的抑郁症状,但这只是在考虑了自我报告的社会支持之后(b = 0.11;p = 0.05)。同化类别与融合类别之间的抑郁症状没有差异(b = -0.06;p = 0.41)。社会支持可能会预防美国文化融入程度较低的南亚移民出现更多的抑郁症状。