• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

良性指征的腹腔镜子宫切除术:临床实践指南

Laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign indications: clinical practice guideline.

作者信息

Sandberg Evelien M, Hehenkamp Wouter J K, Geomini Peggy M, Janssen Petra F, Jansen Frank Willem, Twijnstra Andries R H

机构信息

Section Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery, Department of Gynecology, Leiden University Medical Center, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands.

Department of Gynecology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2017 Sep;296(3):597-606. doi: 10.1007/s00404-017-4467-9. Epub 2017 Jul 26.

DOI:10.1007/s00404-017-4467-9
PMID:28748339
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5548857/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Since the introduction of minimally invasive gynecologic surgery, the percentage of advanced laparoscopic procedures has greatly increased worldwide. It seems therefore, timely to standardize laparoscopic gynecologic care according to the principles of evidence-based medicine. With this goal in mind-the Dutch Society of Gynecological Endoscopic Surgery initiated in The Netherlands the development of a national guideline for laparoscopic hysterectomy (LH). This present article provides a summary of the main recommendations of the guideline.

METHODS

This guideline was developed following the Dutch guideline of medical specialists and in accordance with the AGREE II tool. Clinically important issues were firstly defined and translated into research questions. A literature search per topic was then conducted to identify relevant articles. The quality of the evidence of these articles was rated following the GRADE systematic. An expert panel consisting of 18 selected gynecologists was consulted to formulate best practice recommendations for each topic.

RESULTS

Ten topics were considered in this guideline, including amongst others, the different approaches for hysterectomy, advice regarding tissue extraction, pre-operative medical treatment and prevention of ureter injury. This work resulted in the development of a clinical practical guideline of LH with evidence- and expert-based recommendations. The guideline is currently being implemented in The Netherlands.

CONCLUSION

A guideline for LH was developed. It gives an overview of best clinical practice recommendations. It serves to standardize care, provides guidance for daily practice and aims to guarantee the quality of LH at an (inter)national level.

摘要

目的

自从微创妇科手术引入以来,先进腹腔镜手术的比例在全球范围内大幅增加。因此,根据循证医学原则规范腹腔镜妇科护理似乎很及时。出于这一目的,荷兰妇科内镜外科学会在荷兰启动了腹腔镜子宫切除术(LH)国家指南的制定工作。本文提供了该指南主要建议的总结。

方法

本指南是按照荷兰医学专家指南并依据AGREE II工具制定的。首先确定临床重要问题并转化为研究问题。然后针对每个主题进行文献检索以识别相关文章。按照GRADE系统对这些文章的证据质量进行评级。咨询了由18名选定妇科医生组成的专家小组,为每个主题制定最佳实践建议。

结果

本指南考虑了十个主题,其中包括子宫切除术的不同方法、组织取出建议、术前药物治疗以及输尿管损伤的预防等。这项工作形成了一个基于证据和专家建议的LH临床实用指南。该指南目前正在荷兰实施。

结论

制定了LH指南。它概述了最佳临床实践建议。它有助于规范护理,为日常实践提供指导,并旨在在国家(或国际)层面保证LH的质量。

相似文献

1
Laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign indications: clinical practice guideline.良性指征的腹腔镜子宫切除术:临床实践指南
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2017 Sep;296(3):597-606. doi: 10.1007/s00404-017-4467-9. Epub 2017 Jul 26.
2
Systematic review of the limited evidence for different surgical techniques at benign hysterectomy: A clinical guideline initiated by the Danish Health Authority.良性子宫切除术中不同手术技术有限证据的系统评价:丹麦卫生当局发起的临床指南
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2017 Sep;216:169-177. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2017.07.012. Epub 2017 Jul 21.
3
No. 377-Hysterectomy for Benign Gynaecologic Indications.第377号——良性妇科指征的子宫切除术。
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2019 Apr;41(4):543-557. doi: 10.1016/j.jogc.2018.12.006.
4
Using patient data to optimize an expert-based guideline on convalescence recommendations after gynecological surgery: a prospective cohort study.利用患者数据优化基于专家的妇科手术后康复建议指南:一项前瞻性队列研究。
BMC Surg. 2017 Dec 6;17(1):129. doi: 10.1186/s12893-017-0317-8.
5
The management of uterine leiomyomas.子宫平滑肌瘤的管理
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2015 Feb;37(2):157-178. doi: 10.1016/S1701-2163(15)30338-8.
6
Trends in the implementation of advanced minimally invasive gynecologic surgical procedures in the Netherlands.荷兰先进微创妇科手术的实施趋势。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2015 May-Jun;22(4):642-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2015.01.026. Epub 2015 Feb 3.
7
Systematic implementation of laparoscopic hysterectomy independent of uterus size: clinical effect.系统实施腹腔镜子宫切除术与子宫大小无关:临床效果。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2013 Jul-Aug;20(4):505-16. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2013.02.009.
8
Laparoscopic Versus Open Hysterectomy for Benign Disease in Uteri Weighing >1 kg: A Retrospective Analysis on 258 Patients.腹腔镜与开腹子宫切除术治疗 >1kg 良性子宫疾病的比较:258 例回顾性分析。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2018 Jan;25(1):62-69. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2017.07.005. Epub 2017 Jul 12.
9
Urinary catheterisation management after laparoscopic hysterectomy: a national overview and a nurse preference survey.腹腔镜子宫切除术后的导尿管理:一项全国性概述及护士偏好调查。
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2018 Nov;38(8):1115-1120. doi: 10.1080/01443615.2018.1447914. Epub 2018 Jun 8.
10
In Search for the Best Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy Approach for the Large Uterus: A Review.寻找治疗大子宫的最佳微创子宫切除术方法:综述
Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Jun;60(2):286-295. doi: 10.1097/GRF.0000000000000285.

引用本文的文献

1
A Stepwise Anatomy-Based Protocol for Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy: Educational Tool with Broad Clinical Utility.基于解剖学的全腹腔镜子宫切除术分步方案:具有广泛临床实用性的教育工具
Diagnostics (Basel). 2025 Jul 8;15(14):1736. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15141736.
2
Safety and Effectiveness of G-Mesh Gynecological Meshes Intended for Surgical Treatment of Pelvic Organ Prolapse-A Retrospective Analysis.用于盆腔器官脱垂手术治疗的G型网片妇科网片的安全性和有效性——一项回顾性分析
J Clin Med. 2024 Dec 5;13(23):7421. doi: 10.3390/jcm13237421.
3
VaNoLaH trial: a study protocol-a multinational randomised controlled trial including two identical substudies comparing vaginal versus vNOTES (vaginal natural orifice transluminal surgery) hysterectomy or laparoscopic versus vNOTES hysterectomy.VaNoLaH试验:一项研究方案——一项多国随机对照试验,包括两项相同的子研究,比较经阴道与经阴道自然腔道内镜手术(vNOTES)子宫切除术,以及腹腔镜与vNOTES子宫切除术。
BMJ Open. 2024 Apr 23;14(4):e081979. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-081979.
4
Is the robotic approach the future of distal pancreatectomy with splenectomy? A propensity score matched analysis.机器人手术是否是胰体尾切除术伴脾切除术的未来?一项倾向评分匹配分析。
J Robot Surg. 2024 Apr 2;18(1):148. doi: 10.1007/s11701-024-01906-w.
5
Comparing the efficacy and safety of three surgical approaches for total hysterectomy (TSATH): protocol for a multicentre, single-blind, parallel-group, randomised controlled trial.比较三种全子宫切除术手术方法(TSATH)的疗效和安全性:一项多中心、单盲、平行组、随机对照试验的方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Jan 10;14(1):e074478. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-074478.
6
Robotic Hysterectomy with Ureter Identification and Uterine Artery Ligation for Benign Gynecological Conditions: An Early-Year Single-Center Experience.机器人辅助子宫切除术联合输尿管识别及子宫动脉结扎治疗良性妇科疾病:单中心早期经验
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 May 20;13(10):1809. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13101809.
7
Prevalence of Hysterectomy among Gynecological Surgeries in a Tertiary Care Hospital.在一家三级保健医院中妇科手术中子宫切除术的流行率。
JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc. 2020 Dec 31;58(232):965-970. doi: 10.31729/jnma.5315.
8
Retrospective analysis of secondary resection of the cervical stump after subtotal hysterectomy: why and when?次全子宫切除术后宫颈残端二次切除术的回顾性分析:为何及何时?
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2021 Dec;304(6):1519-1526. doi: 10.1007/s00404-021-06193-6. Epub 2021 Aug 28.
9
Combining total laparoscopic hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy with subcutaneous mastectomy in trans men: The effect on safety outcomes.在跨性别男性中联合全腹腔镜子宫切除术、双侧输卵管卵巢切除术与皮下乳房切除术:对安全结局的影响
Int J Transgend Health. 2020 Apr 25;21(2):138-146. doi: 10.1080/26895269.2020.1751014. eCollection 2020.
10
Surgical steps of total laparoscopic hysterectomy: Part 1: Benign disease by the European Society for Gynaecological Endoscopy (ESGE).全腹腔镜子宫切除术的手术步骤:第1部分:欧洲妇科内镜学会(ESGE)关于良性疾病的内容
Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2019 Jun;11(2):103-110.

本文引用的文献

1
A dynamic quality assessment tool for laparoscopic hysterectomy to measure surgical outcomes.一种用于测量腹腔镜子宫切除术手术结果的动态质量评估工具。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Dec;215(6):754.e1-754.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.07.004. Epub 2016 Jul 9.
2
Hysterectomy for Benign Uterine Disease.良性子宫疾病的子宫切除术
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2016 Apr 8;113(14):242-9. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2016.0242.
3
Nationwide Outcomes Measurement in Colorectal Cancer Surgery: Improving Quality and Reducing Costs.全国结直肠癌手术结果测量:提高质量与降低成本
J Am Coll Surg. 2016 Jan;222(1):19-29.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2015.09.020. Epub 2015 Nov 14.
4
Case-Mix Variables and Predictors for Outcomes of Laparoscopic Hysterectomy: A Systematic Review.腹腔镜子宫切除术结局的病例组合变量及预测因素:一项系统综述
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2016 Mar-Apr;23(3):317-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2015.11.008. Epub 2015 Nov 22.
5
The prevalence of occult leiomyosarcoma at surgery for presumed uterine fibroids: a meta-analysis.手术治疗疑似子宫肌瘤时隐匿性平滑肌肉瘤的患病率:一项荟萃分析。
Gynecol Surg. 2015;12(3):165-177. doi: 10.1007/s10397-015-0894-4. Epub 2015 May 19.
6
Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease.良性妇科疾病子宫切除术的手术入路
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Aug 12;2015(8):CD003677. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003677.pub5.
7
Options on fibroid morcellation: a literature review.子宫肌瘤粉碎术的选择:文献综述
Gynecol Surg. 2015;12(1):3-15. doi: 10.1007/s10397-015-0878-4. Epub 2015 Feb 7.
8
Trends in the implementation of advanced minimally invasive gynecologic surgical procedures in the Netherlands.荷兰先进微创妇科手术的实施趋势。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2015 May-Jun;22(4):642-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2015.01.026. Epub 2015 Feb 3.
9
A systematic review and cost analysis of robot-assisted hysterectomy in malignant and benign conditions.机器人辅助子宫切除术在恶性和良性疾病中的系统评价与成本分析
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2014 Jun;177:1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2014.03.010. Epub 2014 Mar 15.
10
A personalised eHealth programme reduces the duration until return to work after gynaecological surgery: results of a multicentre randomised trial.一项个性化电子健康计划可缩短妇科手术后重返工作岗位的时间:一项多中心随机试验的结果。
BJOG. 2014 Aug;121(9):1127-35; discussion 1136. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.12661. Epub 2014 Feb 11.