Department of Medical Microbiology and Immunology, Diakonessenhuis Hospital, Bosboomstraat 1, 3582 KE, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Centre for Infectious Diseases Research, Diagnostics and Screening, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2017 Nov;36(11):2137-2146. doi: 10.1007/s10096-017-3037-1. Epub 2017 Jul 26.
The diagnosis of Lyme borreliosis is challenging because of the often non-specific symptoms and persisting antibodies after infection. We investigated the diagnostic characteristics of two enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) and an immunoblot for the detection of Borrelia-specific serum antibodies using different test strategies in individuals with and without antibiotic treatment for Lyme borreliosis. This retrospective study included healthy individuals, patients with active Lyme neuroborreliosis and patients treated for Lyme neuroborreliosis. Two ELISAs were compared: the C6 ELISA and the SERION ELISA. Equivocal and positive results were confirmed by immunoblot. We included 174 healthy individuals, of whom 27 (15.5%) were treated for Lyme borreliosis in the past, 36 patients were treated for Lyme neuroborreliosis and 27 patients had active Lyme neuroborreliosis. All the active Lyme neuroborreliosis patients were reactive in both ELISAs (100% sensitivity); less reactivity was seen in the other three groups (range 17.7% to 69.4%). The concordance between the ELISA results was high in active Lyme neuroborreliosis patients (26/27; 96.3%) and healthy individuals (131/147; 89.1%), but lower in treated healthy individuals (18/27; 66.7%) and treated Lyme neuroborreliosis patients (18/36; 50.0%) (p ≤ 0.005). This study showed that antibiotic treatment against Lyme borreliosis was strongly associated with discordant ELISA and test strategy results (odds ratio: 10.52; p < 0.001 and 9.98; p = 0.014, respectively) suggesting antibiotic treatment influences the pace at which the various antibodies directed to the different antigens used in both ELISAs wane. Among treated neuroborreliosis patients, the SERION ELISA stayed positive for a longer period after infection compared to the C6 ELISA. This should be taken into consideration when requesting and/or interpreting Lyme serology.
由于感染后常出现非特异性症状和持续的抗体,莱姆病的诊断具有挑战性。我们研究了两种酶联免疫吸附试验(ELISA)和免疫印迹在未经抗生素治疗和经抗生素治疗的莱姆病患者中检测Borrelia 特异性血清抗体的诊断特征,采用了不同的检测策略。这项回顾性研究包括健康个体、活动性莱姆神经Borreliosis 患者和接受莱姆神经Borreliosis 治疗的患者。比较了两种 ELISA:C6 ELISA 和 SERION ELISA。不确定和阳性结果通过免疫印迹确认。我们纳入了 174 名健康个体,其中 27 名(15.5%)过去曾接受过莱姆病治疗,36 名患者接受了莱姆神经Borreliosis 治疗,27 名患者患有活动性莱姆神经Borreliosis。所有活动性莱姆神经Borreliosis 患者的两种 ELISA 均呈阳性(100%的敏感性);其他三组的反应性较低(17.7%至 69.4%)。在活动性莱姆神经Borreliosis 患者(26/27;96.3%)和健康个体(131/147;89.1%)中,ELISA 结果之间的一致性很高,但在接受治疗的健康个体(18/27;66.7%)和接受治疗的莱姆神经Borreliosis 患者(18/36;50.0%)中较低(p≤0.005)。这项研究表明,针对莱姆病的抗生素治疗与不一致的 ELISA 和检测策略结果密切相关(优势比:10.52;p<0.001 和 9.98;p=0.014),表明抗生素治疗影响了针对两种 ELISA 中使用的不同抗原的各种抗体衰减的速度。在接受治疗的神经Borreliosis 患者中,与 C6 ELISA 相比,SERION ELISA 在感染后保持阳性的时间更长。在请求和/或解释莱姆血清学检测时,应考虑到这一点。