• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

词汇知识可预测词汇处理:来自一群具有不同教育背景参与者的证据。

Vocabulary Knowledge Predicts Lexical Processing: Evidence from a Group of Participants with Diverse Educational Backgrounds.

作者信息

Mainz Nina, Shao Zeshu, Brysbaert Marc, Meyer Antje S

机构信息

Psychology of Language Department, Max Planck Institute for PsycholinguisticsNijmegen, Netherlands.

Department of Experimental Psychology, Ghent UniversityGhent, Belgium.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2017 Jul 13;8:1164. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01164. eCollection 2017.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01164
PMID:28751871
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5507948/
Abstract

Vocabulary knowledge is central to a speaker's command of their language. In previous research, greater vocabulary knowledge has been associated with advantages in language processing. In this study, we examined the relationship between individual differences in vocabulary and language processing performance more closely by (i) using a battery of vocabulary tests instead of just one test, and (ii) testing not only university students (Experiment 1) but young adults from a broader range of educational backgrounds (Experiment 2). Five vocabulary tests were developed, including multiple-choice and open antonym and synonym tests and a definition test, and administered together with two established measures of vocabulary. Language processing performance was measured using a lexical decision task. In Experiment 1, vocabulary and word frequency were found to predict word recognition speed while we did not observe an interaction between the effects. In Experiment 2, word recognition performance was predicted by word frequency and the interaction between word frequency and vocabulary, with high-vocabulary individuals showing smaller frequency effects. While overall the individual vocabulary tests were correlated and showed similar relationships with language processing as compared to a composite measure of all tests, they appeared to share less variance in Experiment 2 than in Experiment 1. Implications of our findings concerning the assessment of vocabulary size in individual differences studies and the investigation of individuals from more varied backgrounds are discussed.

摘要

词汇知识是说话者掌握其语言的核心。在以往的研究中,更丰富的词汇知识与语言处理方面的优势相关联。在本研究中,我们通过以下方式更深入地考察了词汇方面的个体差异与语言处理表现之间的关系:(i)使用一系列词汇测试而非单一测试;(ii)不仅测试大学生(实验1),还测试来自更广泛教育背景的年轻人(实验2)。我们开发了五项词汇测试,包括多项选择题、开放式反义词和同义词测试以及定义测试,并与两项既定的词汇测量方法一起进行测试。使用词汇判断任务来测量语言处理表现。在实验1中,发现词汇量和词频可预测单词识别速度,但我们未观察到两者效应之间的相互作用。在实验2中,单词识别表现由词频以及词频与词汇量之间的相互作用所预测,词汇量高的个体表现出较小的频率效应。虽然总体而言,各个词汇测试之间相互关联,并且与综合所有测试的指标相比,它们与语言处理的关系相似,但在实验2中,它们所共享的方差似乎比实验1中更少。我们讨论了研究结果对于个体差异研究中词汇量评估以及对来自更多样化背景个体进行调查的意义。

相似文献

1
Vocabulary Knowledge Predicts Lexical Processing: Evidence from a Group of Participants with Diverse Educational Backgrounds.词汇知识可预测词汇处理:来自一群具有不同教育背景参与者的证据。
Front Psychol. 2017 Jul 13;8:1164. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01164. eCollection 2017.
2
Effectiveness of intervention focused on vocational course vocabulary in post-16 students with (developmental) language disorder.以职业课程词汇为重点的干预措施对(发展性)语言障碍的 16 岁后学生的有效性。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2022 Nov;57(6):1334-1353. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12758. Epub 2022 Jul 20.
3
Word Knowledge Dimensions in L2 Lexical Inference: Testing Vocabulary Knowledge and Partial Word Knowledge.第二语言词汇推断中的词知识维度:测试词汇知识和部分词知识。
J Psycholinguist Res. 2022 Feb;51(1):151-168. doi: 10.1007/s10936-021-09831-x. Epub 2022 Jan 14.
4
Knowledge of a second language influences auditory word recognition in the native language.第二语言知识会影响母语的听觉单词识别。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2011 Jul;37(4):952-65. doi: 10.1037/a0023217.
5
Non-native listeners' recognition of high-variability speech using PRESTO.非母语听众使用PRESTO对高变异性语音的识别。
J Am Acad Audiol. 2014 Oct;25(9):869-92. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.25.9.9.
6
Word knowledge in the crowd: Measuring vocabulary size and word prevalence in a massive online experiment.群体中的词汇知识:在一项大规模在线实验中测量词汇量和词汇流行度
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2015;68(8):1665-92. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2015.1022560. Epub 2015 Apr 8.
7
Convergence and divergence in prediction from vocabulary and speed of word processing.词汇预测与词汇处理速度中的趋同与差异。
Cogn Dev. 2022 Oct-Dec;64. doi: 10.1016/j.cogdev.2022.101249. Epub 2022 Sep 26.
8
Examination of the neighborhood activation theory in normal and hearing-impaired listeners.对正常和听力受损听众的邻域激活理论的检验。
Ear Hear. 2001 Feb;22(1):1-13. doi: 10.1097/00003446-200102000-00001.
9
The relationship between reading ability and lateralized lexical decision.阅读能力与词汇决策偏侧化之间的关系。
Brain Cogn. 2004 Aug;55(3):507-15. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2004.03.001.
10
Individual differences in online spoken word recognition: Implications for SLI.在线口语识别中的个体差异:对 SLI 的启示。
Cogn Psychol. 2010 Feb;60(1):1-39. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2009.06.003.

引用本文的文献

1
The polish vocabulary size test: A novel adaptive test for receptive vocabulary assessment.波兰语词汇量测试:一种用于接受性词汇评估的新型自适应测试。
Behav Res Methods. 2025 Aug 11;57(9):254. doi: 10.3758/s13428-025-02775-3.
2
The German Auditory and Image (GAudI) vocabulary test: A new German receptive vocabulary test and its relationships to other tests measuring linguistic experience.德国听觉与图像(GAudI)词汇测试:一项新的德语接受性词汇测试及其与其他衡量语言经验的测试之间的关系。
PLoS One. 2025 Apr 28;20(4):e0318115. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0318115. eCollection 2025.
3
Predictive Markers of Post-Stroke Cognitive Recovery and Depression in Ischemic Stroke Patients: A 6-Month Longitudinal Study.缺血性中风患者中风后认知恢复和抑郁的预测标志物:一项为期6个月的纵向研究。
Eur J Investig Health Psychol Educ. 2024 Dec 11;14(12):3056-3072. doi: 10.3390/ejihpe14120200.
4
Individual differences in online research: Comparing lab-based and online administration of a psycholinguistic battery of linguistic and domain-general skills.在线研究中的个体差异:比较基于实验室和在线方式施测的一套语言及领域通用技能的心理语言学测试。
Behav Res Methods. 2024 Dec 19;57(1):22. doi: 10.3758/s13428-024-02533-x.
5
Using Psychometric Network Analysis to Examine the Components of Spoken Word Recognition.运用心理测量网络分析来检验口语单词识别的组成部分。
J Cogn. 2024 Jan 10;7(1):10. doi: 10.5334/joc.340. eCollection 2024.
6
IDLaS-NL - A platform for running customized studies on individual differences in Dutch language skills via the Internet.IDLaS-NL - 一个通过互联网运行针对荷兰语技能个体差异的定制研究的平台。
Behav Res Methods. 2024 Mar;56(3):2422-2436. doi: 10.3758/s13428-023-02156-8. Epub 2023 Sep 25.
7
Visual Motor Reaction Times Predict Receptive and Expressive Language Development in Early School-Age Children.视觉运动反应时间可预测学龄儿童早期的接受性和表达性语言发展。
Brain Sci. 2023 Jun 19;13(6):965. doi: 10.3390/brainsci13060965.
8
Protocol of the Healthy Brain Study: An accessible resource for understanding the human brain and how it dynamically and individually operates in its bio-social context.健康大脑研究协议:一个用于理解人类大脑及其在生物社会背景下如何动态且独特运作的可获取资源。
PLoS One. 2021 Dec 29;16(12):e0260952. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260952. eCollection 2021.
9
Interindividual Variation Refuses to Go Away: A Bayesian Computer Model of Language Change in Communicative Networks.个体差异难以消除:交际网络中语言变化的贝叶斯计算机模型
Front Psychol. 2021 Jun 21;12:626118. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.626118. eCollection 2021.
10
Word skipping as an indicator of individual reading style during literary reading.在文学阅读中,跳读作为个体阅读风格的一种指标。
J Eye Mov Res. 2020 Feb 27;13(3). doi: 10.16910/jemr.13.3.2.

本文引用的文献

1
The BEST Dataset of Language Proficiency.最佳语言能力数据集。
Front Psychol. 2017 Apr 6;8:522. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00522. eCollection 2017.
2
Individual differences in the perception of regional, nonnative, and disordered speech varieties.在对地域、非本族语和无序言语变体的感知方面的个体差异。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2016 Nov;140(5):3775. doi: 10.1121/1.4966677.
3
How Many Words Do We Know? Practical Estimates of Vocabulary Size Dependent on Word Definition, the Degree of Language Input and the Participant's Age.我们认识多少单词?基于单词定义、语言输入程度和参与者年龄的词汇量实际估算
Front Psychol. 2016 Jul 29;7:1116. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01116. eCollection 2016.
4
Cognitive predictors of perceptual adaptation to accented speech.对口音语音感知适应的认知预测因素。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2015 Apr;137(4):2015-24. doi: 10.1121/1.4916265.
5
Word knowledge in the crowd: Measuring vocabulary size and word prevalence in a massive online experiment.群体中的词汇知识:在一项大规模在线实验中测量词汇量和词汇流行度
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2015;68(8):1665-92. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2015.1022560. Epub 2015 Apr 8.
6
Decomposing encoding and decisional components in visual-word recognition: a diffusion model analysis.视觉单词识别中编码与决策成分的分解:扩散模型分析
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2014;67(12):2455-66. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2014.937447. Epub 2014 Sep 5.
7
What do verbal fluency tasks measure? Predictors of verbal fluency performance in older adults.言语流畅性任务测量什么?老年人言语流畅性表现的预测因素。
Front Psychol. 2014 Jul 22;5:772. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00772. eCollection 2014.
8
Low working memory capacity is only spuriously related to poor reading comprehension.低工作记忆容量与阅读理解能力差只是虚假相关。
Cognition. 2014 Jun;131(3):373-403. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2014.01.007. Epub 2014 Mar 19.
9
A behavioral database for masked form priming.一个用于遮蔽形式启动的行为数据库。
Behav Res Methods. 2014 Dec;46(4):1052-67. doi: 10.3758/s13428-013-0442-y.
10
Working memory affects older adults' use of context in spoken-word recognition.工作记忆会影响老年人在口语单词识别中对语境的运用。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2014;67(9):1842-62. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2013.879391. Epub 2014 Mar 25.