• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

德国下萨克森州牙科专业人员和非专业人员的口腔健康行为及口腔卫生——一项调查

Oral Health Behaviour and Oral Hygiene of Dental Professionals and Laypersons - A Survey Performed in Lower Saxony, Germany.

作者信息

Knöfler Gerhild, Friedl Katrin, Fresmann Sylvia, Mausberg Rainer F, Haak Rainer, Ziebolz Dirk

出版信息

Oral Health Prev Dent. 2017;15(4):347-355. doi: 10.3290/j.ohpd.a38741.

DOI:10.3290/j.ohpd.a38741
PMID:28752159
Abstract

PURPOSE

The aim of this survey-based cross-sectional study was to analyse the oral health behaviour of dental professionals and persons without professional dental knowledge (layperson group) regarding the use and selection of tools for their personal dental hygiene.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 356 persons participated in the survey (dental professional group: 160; layperson group: 196). Information regarding dental hygiene habits, such as toothbrush use, toothbrushing habits, and the use of additional dental hygiene tools was determined using a standardised questionnaire. Data were analysed using the chi-squared and Wilcoxon tests, with significance set at p < 0.05.

RESULTS

93% of the dental professional group and 89% of layperson group used manual toothbrushes (p = 0.03). Power toothbrushes were used by 57% of those surveyed in the dental professional group and 37% of those in the layperson group (p < 0.01). In the dental professional group, the duration of toothbrushing was significantly longer and it was performed more often compared to layperson group (p < 0.001). The use of dental floss and interdental brushes in the layperson group (dental floss 38%, interdental brush 5%) was considerably lower than in the dental professional group (dental floss 84%, interdental brush 11%; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The results of the survey on oral health behaviour revealed significant differences between the groups. The acceptance of additional tools for personal dental hygiene was low, such as dental floss and interdental brushes. Given the great importance of these tools for biofilm control, they should be emphasised in motivational measures and instructions regarding oral care performed at home.

摘要

目的

本基于调查的横断面研究旨在分析牙科专业人员和没有专业牙科知识的人群(非专业人员组)在个人口腔卫生工具的使用和选择方面的口腔健康行为。

材料与方法

共有356人参与了调查(牙科专业人员组:160人;非专业人员组:196人)。使用标准化问卷确定有关口腔卫生习惯的信息,如牙刷使用情况、刷牙习惯以及其他口腔卫生工具的使用情况。采用卡方检验和威尔科克森检验对数据进行分析,显著性水平设定为p < 0.05。

结果

牙科专业人员组中有93%的人使用手动牙刷,非专业人员组中有89%的人使用手动牙刷(p = 0.03)。牙科专业人员组中有57%的受访者使用电动牙刷,非专业人员组中有37%的受访者使用电动牙刷(p < 0.01)。在牙科专业人员组中,刷牙时间明显更长,且比非专业人员组更频繁(p < 0.001)。非专业人员组中牙线和牙缝刷的使用率(牙线38%,牙缝刷5%)明显低于牙科专业人员组(牙线84%,牙缝刷11%;p < 0.001)。

结论

口腔健康行为调查结果显示两组之间存在显著差异。个人口腔卫生额外工具(如牙线和牙缝刷)的接受度较低。鉴于这些工具对生物膜控制非常重要,应在家庭口腔护理的激励措施和指导中予以强调。

相似文献

1
Oral Health Behaviour and Oral Hygiene of Dental Professionals and Laypersons - A Survey Performed in Lower Saxony, Germany.德国下萨克森州牙科专业人员和非专业人员的口腔健康行为及口腔卫生——一项调查
Oral Health Prev Dent. 2017;15(4):347-355. doi: 10.3290/j.ohpd.a38741.
2
Interdental plaque reduction after use of different devices in young subjects with intact papilla: A randomized clinical trial.在具有完整龈乳头的年轻受试者中使用不同器械后牙菌斑减少情况:一项随机临床试验。
Int J Dent Hyg. 2018 Aug;16(3):389-396. doi: 10.1111/idh.12318. Epub 2017 Oct 2.
3
Comparison of different approaches of interdental oral hygiene: interdental brushes versus dental floss.不同牙间隙口腔卫生方法的比较:牙间隙刷与牙线对比
J Periodontol. 1998 Jul;69(7):759-64. doi: 10.1902/jop.1998.69.7.759.
4
Comparative Evaluation of Cleaning Efficacy of Interdental Brush and Interdental Floss in Orthodontics Patients From Vidarbha Region: An Interventional Study.比达尔巴地区正畸患者使用牙间隙刷和牙线清洁效果的比较评估:一项干预性研究。
Cureus. 2023 Sep 29;15(9):e46191. doi: 10.7759/cureus.46191. eCollection 2023 Sep.
5
[Comparison of interdental oral hygiene aids efficiency in patients with healthy periodontium: a split-mouth study].[健康牙周患者牙间隙口腔卫生辅助工具效率比较:一项半口对照研究]
Stomatologiia (Mosk). 2018;97(5):31-33. doi: 10.17116/stomat20189705131.
6
The Effect of Proximal Cleaning Devices on Periodontal Status in Korean Adults between 2016 and 2018.2016 年至 2018 年韩国成年人牙周状况的近端清洁设备效果。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Feb 22;18(4):2116. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18042116.
7
Interdental brushing for the prevention and control of periodontal diseases and dental caries in adults.成人使用牙间隙刷预防和控制牙周疾病及龋齿。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Dec 18(12):CD009857. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009857.pub2.
8
Home use of interdental cleaning devices and toothbrushing and their role in disease prevention.牙间隙清洁装置的家庭使用及刷牙及其在疾病预防中的作用。
Evid Based Dent. 2019 Dec;20(4):103-104. doi: 10.1038/s41432-019-0069-7.
9
Efficacy of straight versus angled interdental brushes on interproximal tooth cleaning: a randomized controlled trial.直型与角度型邻间牙刷对邻面牙齿清洁效果的随机对照试验。
Int J Dent Hyg. 2014 May;12(2):152-7. doi: 10.1111/idh.12042. Epub 2013 Jul 24.
10
A comparison of proximal plaque removal using floss and interdental brushes.使用牙线和牙缝刷进行近端牙菌斑清除的比较。
J Clin Periodontol. 1991 Oct;18(9):681-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051x.1991.tb00109.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Increase in the level of oral neutrophils with gingival inflammation - A population survey.牙龈炎症时口腔中性粒细胞水平的升高——一项人群调查。
Saudi Dent J. 2022 Dec;34(8):795-801. doi: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2022.11.004. Epub 2022 Nov 17.
2
Interdental biofilm reduction and composition after use of an activated and inactivated side-to-side toothbrush - a proof-of-principle clinical study.使用激活和非激活侧向牙刷后牙间隙生物膜减少和组成的初步临床研究。
Clin Oral Investig. 2022 Mar;26(3):2909-2919. doi: 10.1007/s00784-021-04273-0. Epub 2022 Jan 11.
3
Influence of the oscillation frequency of different side-to-side toothbrushes on noncontact biofilm removal.
不同左右对置型牙刷的振荡频率对非接触性生物膜去除的影响。
Clin Oral Investig. 2018 Jul;22(6):2141-2147. doi: 10.1007/s00784-017-2305-x. Epub 2018 Jan 22.