1 National Acoustics Laboratories (NAL), Macquarie University, NSW, Australia.
2 HEARing CRC, The University of Melbourne, Carlton, Australia.
Trends Hear. 2017 Jan-Dec;21:2331216517710373. doi: 10.1177/2331216517710373.
This article reports on the psychosocial development and factors influencing outcomes of 5-year-old children with cochlear implants (CIs) or hearing aids (HAs). It further examines differences between children with CIs and HAs with similar levels of hearing loss. Data were collected as part of the Longitudinal Outcomes of Children with Hearing Impairment study-a prospective, population-based study. Parents/caregivers of children completed the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire ( n = 333), the Social Skills subscale from the Child Development Inventory ( n = 317), and questionnaires on functional auditory behavior (Parents' Evaluation of Aural/oral performance of Children), and demographics. Children completed assessments of nonverbal cognitive ability (Wechsler Non-verbal Scale of Ability) and language (Preschool Language Scale - fourth edition). On average, parent-rated Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire scores on emotional or behavioral difficulties were within 1 SD of the normative mean; however, Child Development Inventory scores on social skills were more than 1 SD below the norm. Children with severe-to-profound hearing losses using HAs had significantly more behavioral problems than children with CIs. Regression analyses showed that non-verbal cognitive ability, language, and functional auditory behavior were significantly associated with psychosocial outcomes for children with HAs, whereas outcomes for children with CIs were associated with functional auditory behavior and the presence of additional disabilities. Age at hearing intervention, severity of hearing loss, and communication mode were not associated with outcomes. The results suggest that even children who develop good language ability with the help of a HA or CI may have psychosocial problems if they exhibit difficulties with listening and communicating in everyday environments. The findings have implications for developing interventions for young children with hearing loss.
本文报告了 5 岁人工耳蜗植入(CI)或助听器(HA)儿童的心理社会发展和影响结果的因素。它进一步研究了具有相似听力损失水平的 CI 和 HA 儿童之间的差异。数据是作为听力障碍儿童纵向结果研究的一部分收集的,这是一项前瞻性、基于人群的研究。儿童的父母/照顾者完成了长处和困难问卷(n=333)、儿童发展清单的社交技能分量表(n=317)以及功能听觉行为(父母对儿童听觉/口语表现的评估)和人口统计学问卷。儿童完成了非言语认知能力(威斯康星非言语量表)和语言(学前语言量表第四版)的评估。平均而言,父母评定的情绪或行为困难的长处和困难问卷评分在正常均值的 1 个标准差内;然而,儿童发展清单的社交技能评分低于正常水平 1 个标准差以上。使用 HA 的重度至极重度听力损失儿童的行为问题明显多于 CI 儿童。回归分析表明,非言语认知能力、语言和功能听觉行为与 HA 儿童的心理社会结果显著相关,而 CI 儿童的结果与功能听觉行为和存在其他残疾有关。听力干预的年龄、听力损失的严重程度和交流模式与结果无关。结果表明,即使在 HA 或 CI 的帮助下发展出良好语言能力的儿童,如果在日常环境中存在听力和交流困难,也可能存在心理社会问题。研究结果对为听力损失的幼儿开发干预措施具有启示意义。