Ciccarese Chiara, Iacovelli Roberto, Brunelli Matteo, Massari Francesco, Bimbatti Davide, Fantinel Emanuela, De Marco Vincenzo, Porcaro Antonio Benito, Martignoni Guido, Artibani Walter, Tortora Giampaolo
Medical Oncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata (AOUI), University of Verona, Italy.
Medical Oncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata (AOUI), University of Verona, Italy.
Eur J Cancer. 2017 Sep;83:237-246. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2017.06.030. Epub 2017 Jul 27.
Non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma (nccRCC) tumours include a heterogeneous group of malignancies that profoundly differ in terms of morphology, genetic profile, clinical behaviour and prognosis. The optimal treatment algorithm for nccRCC is still unknown and derived mainly from evidence available for ccRCC, being therefore represented by targeted agents against vascular endothelial growth factor and mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathways. We aimed to compare the efficacy of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (VEGFR-TKis) and mTOR inhibitors (mTORi) for the treatment of nccRCC patients.
Searching the MEDLINE/PubMed, Cochrane Library and American Society of Clinical Oncology Meeting abstracts prospective studies were identified. Data extraction was conduced according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement. The measured outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and the overall response rate (ORR).
Four randomised controlled trials were selected for final analysis, with a total of 332 patients evaluable for PFS. Treatment with TKi significantly reduced the risk of progression compared with mTORi (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.71; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.60-0.84; p < 0.0001). This difference remained significant when sunitinib was compared with everolimus in first-line setting (HR = 0.67; 95% CI, 0.56-0.80; p < 0.00001). In the 332 patients evaluable for OS, no significant difference was found between TKi and mTORi (HR = 0.86; 95% CI, 0.67-1.12; p = 0.27). In the 176 evaluable patients, TKis therapy did not improve the ORR when compared with mTORi (relative risk [RR] = 2.21; 95% CI, 0.87-5.60; p = 0.09), even if treatment with sunitinib doubled the probability of achieving a tumour response.
Treatment with TKis significantly improves PFS, but not OS, when compared with mTORi. Moreover, sunitinib as first-line therapy reduces the risk of progression compared with everolimus; therefore, supporting the standard treatment paradigm broadly used for ccRCC patients. The relatively modest efficacy of available targeted therapies reinforces the need of future histology based, molecular driven therapeutic paradigm.
非透明细胞肾细胞癌(nccRCC)肿瘤包括一组异质性恶性肿瘤,在形态、基因谱、临床行为和预后方面存在显著差异。nccRCC的最佳治疗方案仍不明确,主要基于透明细胞肾细胞癌(ccRCC)的现有证据,因此以针对血管内皮生长因子和雷帕霉素哺乳动物靶点(mTOR)通路的靶向药物为代表。我们旨在比较血管内皮生长因子受体酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(VEGFR-TKis)和mTOR抑制剂(mTORi)治疗nccRCC患者的疗效。
检索MEDLINE/PubMed、Cochrane图书馆和美国临床肿瘤学会会议摘要,确定前瞻性研究。根据系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目声明进行数据提取。测量的结果为无进展生存期(PFS)、总生存期(OS)和总缓解率(ORR)。
选择四项随机对照试验进行最终分析,共有332例患者可评估PFS。与mTORi相比,TKi治疗显著降低了疾病进展风险(风险比[HR]=0.71;95%置信区间[CI]0.60-0.84;p<0.0001)。在一线治疗中,舒尼替尼与依维莫司相比,这种差异仍然显著(HR=0.67;95%CI,0.56-0.80;p<0.00001)。在332例可评估OS的患者中,TKi和mTORi之间未发现显著差异(HR=0.86;95%CI,0.67-1.12;p=0.27)。在176例可评估患者中,与mTORi相比,TKi治疗并未提高ORR(相对风险[RR]=2.21;95%CI,0.87-5.60;p=0.09),即使舒尼替尼治疗使肿瘤缓解的概率增加了一倍。
与mTORi相比,TKi治疗显著改善了PFS,但未改善OS。此外,舒尼替尼作为一线治疗与依维莫司相比降低了疾病进展风险;因此,支持广泛用于ccRCC患者的标准治疗模式。现有靶向治疗的疗效相对有限,这进一步凸显了未来基于组织学、分子驱动治疗模式的必要性。