Suppr超能文献

婴儿气质的潜在剖面和聚类分析:个体中心方法的比较。

Latent profile and cluster analysis of infant temperament: Comparisons across person-centered approaches.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Washington State University.

Department of Child, Youth, and Family Studies, Center for Brain, Biology and Behavior, University of Nebraska- Lincoln.

出版信息

Dev Psychol. 2017 Oct;53(10):1811-1825. doi: 10.1037/dev0000382. Epub 2017 Jul 31.

Abstract

There is renewed interest in person-centered approaches to understanding the structure of temperament. However, questions concerning temperament types are not frequently framed in a developmental context, especially during infancy. In addition, the most common person-centered techniques, cluster analysis (CA) and latent profile analysis (LPA), have not been compared with respect to derived temperament types. To address these gaps, we set out to identify temperament types for younger and older infants, comparing LPA and CA techniques. Multiple data sets (N = 1,356; 672 girls, 677 boys) with maternal ratings of infant temperament obtained using the Infant Behavior Questionnaire-Revised (Gartstein & Rothbart, 2003) were combined. All infants were between 3 and 12 months of age (M = 7.85; SD = 3.00). Due to rapid development in the first year of life, LPA and CA were performed separately for younger (n = 731; 3 to 8 months of age) and older (n = 625; 9 to 12 months of age) infants. Results supported 3-profile/cluster solutions as optimal for younger infants, and 5-profile/cluster solutions for the older subsample, indicating considerable differences between early/mid and late infancy. LPA and CA solutions produced relatively comparable types for younger and older infants. Results are discussed in the context of developmental changes unique to the end of the first year of life, which likely account for the present findings. (PsycINFO Database Record

摘要

人们对以个体为中心的方法重新产生了兴趣,以了解气质的结构。然而,关于气质类型的问题通常不是在发展背景下提出的,尤其是在婴儿期。此外,最常见的以个体为中心的技术,聚类分析(CA)和潜在剖面分析(LPA),尚未就衍生的气质类型进行比较。为了解决这些差距,我们着手确定年龄较小和较大的婴儿的气质类型,比较 LPA 和 CA 技术。使用修订后的婴儿行为问卷(Gartstein&Rothbart,2003)对婴儿气质进行了母亲评定的多个数据集(N = 1356;672 名女孩,677 名男孩)被合并。所有婴儿的年龄均在 3 至 12 个月之间(M = 7.85;SD = 3.00)。由于生命的第一年发展迅速,因此对年龄较小(n = 731;3 至 8 个月大)和年龄较大的婴儿(n = 625;9 至 12 个月大)分别进行了 LPA 和 CA。结果支持 3 个轮廓/聚类解决方案是年龄较小婴儿的最佳选择,5 个轮廓/聚类解决方案是年龄较大婴儿的最佳选择,这表明早期/中期和晚期婴儿之间存在很大差异。对于年龄较小和年龄较大的婴儿,LPA 和 CA 解决方案产生了相对可比的类型。结果是在与生命第一年结束时特有的发育变化的背景下进行讨论的,这可能解释了目前的发现。(PsycINFO 数据库记录)

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4994/5612890/94c4d36f5d4e/nihms892383f1.jpg

相似文献

5
Temperamental precursors of infant attachment with mothers and fathers.婴儿与母亲和父亲依恋的气质前驱。
Infant Behav Dev. 2013 Dec;36(4):796-808. doi: 10.1016/j.infbeh.2013.09.004. Epub 2013 Oct 5.

引用本文的文献

10
Temperament Types at Age 3 and Smartphone Overdependence at Age 10.3岁时的气质类型与10岁时的智能手机过度依赖
Front Psychol. 2022 Mar 10;13:833948. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.833948. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Latent Class Analysis for Developmental Research.发育研究的潜在类别分析
Child Dev Perspect. 2016 Mar;10(1):59-64. doi: 10.1111/cdep.12163. Epub 2016 Jan 27.
6
Using Latent Class Analysis to Model Temperament Types.使用潜在类别分析对气质类型进行建模。
Multivariate Behav Res. 2004 Oct 1;39(4):625-52. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr3904_3.
9
Origins of Effortful Control: Infant and Parent Contributions.努力控制的起源:婴儿与父母的作用
Infancy. 2013 Mar-Apr;18(2):149-183. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-7078.2012.00119.x.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验