Department of Psychology, Washington State University.
Department of Child, Youth, and Family Studies, Center for Brain, Biology and Behavior, University of Nebraska- Lincoln.
Dev Psychol. 2017 Oct;53(10):1811-1825. doi: 10.1037/dev0000382. Epub 2017 Jul 31.
There is renewed interest in person-centered approaches to understanding the structure of temperament. However, questions concerning temperament types are not frequently framed in a developmental context, especially during infancy. In addition, the most common person-centered techniques, cluster analysis (CA) and latent profile analysis (LPA), have not been compared with respect to derived temperament types. To address these gaps, we set out to identify temperament types for younger and older infants, comparing LPA and CA techniques. Multiple data sets (N = 1,356; 672 girls, 677 boys) with maternal ratings of infant temperament obtained using the Infant Behavior Questionnaire-Revised (Gartstein & Rothbart, 2003) were combined. All infants were between 3 and 12 months of age (M = 7.85; SD = 3.00). Due to rapid development in the first year of life, LPA and CA were performed separately for younger (n = 731; 3 to 8 months of age) and older (n = 625; 9 to 12 months of age) infants. Results supported 3-profile/cluster solutions as optimal for younger infants, and 5-profile/cluster solutions for the older subsample, indicating considerable differences between early/mid and late infancy. LPA and CA solutions produced relatively comparable types for younger and older infants. Results are discussed in the context of developmental changes unique to the end of the first year of life, which likely account for the present findings. (PsycINFO Database Record
人们对以个体为中心的方法重新产生了兴趣,以了解气质的结构。然而,关于气质类型的问题通常不是在发展背景下提出的,尤其是在婴儿期。此外,最常见的以个体为中心的技术,聚类分析(CA)和潜在剖面分析(LPA),尚未就衍生的气质类型进行比较。为了解决这些差距,我们着手确定年龄较小和较大的婴儿的气质类型,比较 LPA 和 CA 技术。使用修订后的婴儿行为问卷(Gartstein&Rothbart,2003)对婴儿气质进行了母亲评定的多个数据集(N = 1356;672 名女孩,677 名男孩)被合并。所有婴儿的年龄均在 3 至 12 个月之间(M = 7.85;SD = 3.00)。由于生命的第一年发展迅速,因此对年龄较小(n = 731;3 至 8 个月大)和年龄较大的婴儿(n = 625;9 至 12 个月大)分别进行了 LPA 和 CA。结果支持 3 个轮廓/聚类解决方案是年龄较小婴儿的最佳选择,5 个轮廓/聚类解决方案是年龄较大婴儿的最佳选择,这表明早期/中期和晚期婴儿之间存在很大差异。对于年龄较小和年龄较大的婴儿,LPA 和 CA 解决方案产生了相对可比的类型。结果是在与生命第一年结束时特有的发育变化的背景下进行讨论的,这可能解释了目前的发现。(PsycINFO 数据库记录)