• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

反馈与监测对结肠镜检查退镜时间及息肉检出率的影响。

Impact of feedback and monitoring on colonoscopy withdrawal times and polyp detection rates.

作者信息

Nielsen Amalie Bach, Nielsen Ole Haagen, Hendel Jakob

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology, Herlev Hospital, University of Copenhagen,Denmark.

出版信息

BMJ Open Gastroenterol. 2017 Jun 1;4(1):e000142. doi: 10.1136/bmjgast-2017-000142. eCollection 2017.

DOI:10.1136/bmjgast-2017-000142
PMID:28761691
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5508965/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have shown colonoscopy withdrawal time (WT) to be a reliable surrogate indicator for polyp detection rate (PDR) and adenoma detection rate (ADR) in colonoscopy. Our aim was to assess the impact of feedback and monitoring of WT on PDR in routine colonoscopies with long-term follow-up.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 307 colonoscopies were performed in three separate clinical scenarios. First, PDR and WT were recorded without the staff being aware of the specific objective of the study. Before the second scenario, the staff was given interventional information and feedback on WTs and PDRs from the first scenario and was encouraged to aim for a minimum WT of 8 min. Retention of knowledge gained was reassessed in the third scenario 1 year later.

RESULTS

The PDR in the first two scenarios differed significantly (p<0.01), with a more than 90% increase in PDR after intervention from 22% to 42% (95% CI 1.44 to 4.95), although the mean WT did not change (6.8 vs 7.2 min; p>0.05). The increase in PDR between the first and second scenarios was retained in the third follow-up scenario 1 year later where the WT of both polyp-positive and polyp-negative colonoscopies was found to be longer.

CONCLUSIONS

PDR almost doubled from the first to the second scenario of a real-life colonoscopy setting, indicating that awareness of WT is crucial. The knowledge gained from this intervention in routine practice was even retained after a year.

摘要

背景

既往研究表明,结肠镜检查的退镜时间(WT)是结肠镜检查中息肉检出率(PDR)和腺瘤检出率(ADR)的可靠替代指标。我们的目的是评估在长期随访的常规结肠镜检查中,WT的反馈和监测对PDR的影响。

材料与方法

在三种不同的临床场景下共进行了307例结肠镜检查。首先,在工作人员不知道该研究具体目的的情况下记录PDR和WT。在第二种场景之前,向工作人员提供了来自第一种场景的关于WT和PDR的干预信息及反馈,并鼓励他们将最短WT目标设定为8分钟。1年后在第三种场景中重新评估所获得知识的保留情况。

结果

前两种场景下的PDR有显著差异(p<0.01),干预后PDR增加了90%以上,从22%增至42%(95%CI 1.44至4.95),尽管平均WT没有变化(6.8对7.2分钟;p>0.05)。第一种和第二种场景之间PDR的增加在1年后的第三次随访场景中得以保持,在该场景中发现息肉阳性和息肉阴性结肠镜检查的WT均更长。

结论

在现实生活中的结肠镜检查场景中,从第一种场景到第二种场景,PDR几乎翻倍,这表明对WT的认知至关重要。在常规实践中从这种干预中获得的知识甚至在一年后仍得以保留。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a8c/5508965/6b535a09f522/bmjgast2017000142f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a8c/5508965/6b535a09f522/bmjgast2017000142f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a8c/5508965/6b535a09f522/bmjgast2017000142f01.jpg

相似文献

1
Impact of feedback and monitoring on colonoscopy withdrawal times and polyp detection rates.反馈与监测对结肠镜检查退镜时间及息肉检出率的影响。
BMJ Open Gastroenterol. 2017 Jun 1;4(1):e000142. doi: 10.1136/bmjgast-2017-000142. eCollection 2017.
2
Polyp detection rate in transverse and sigmoid colon significantly increases with longer withdrawal time during screening colonoscopy.在筛查结肠镜检查期间,随着退镜时间延长,横结肠和乙状结肠的息肉检出率显著增加。
PLoS One. 2017 Mar 22;12(3):e0174155. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0174155. eCollection 2017.
3
Improving trainee colonoscopy performance by investigating the withdrawal time from individual colonic segments: a single-center observational study.通过研究从单个结肠段退出的时间来提高学员结肠镜检查的表现:一项单中心观察性研究。
Ann Palliat Med. 2021 Aug;10(8):8607-8616. doi: 10.21037/apm-21-622. Epub 2021 Jul 30.
4
Colonoscopy procedural volume increases adenoma and polyp detection rates in gastroenterologytrainees.结肠镜检查操作量可提高胃肠病学实习生的腺瘤和息肉检出率。
World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2017 Nov 16;9(11):540-551. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v9.i11.540.
5
Nonneoplastic polypectomy during screening colonoscopy: the impact on polyp detection rate, adenoma detection rate, and overall cost.筛查结肠镜检查期间的非肿瘤性息肉切除术:对息肉检出率、腺瘤检出率及总体成本的影响
Gastrointest Endosc. 2015 Aug;82(2):370-375.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2015.01.016. Epub 2015 Apr 3.
6
The effect of periodic monitoring and feedback on screening colonoscopy withdrawal times, polyp detection rates, and patient satisfaction scores.周期性监测和反馈对结肠镜检查退出时间、息肉检出率和患者满意度评分的影响。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2010 Jun;71(7):1253-9. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.01.017.
7
Predicting ADR from PDR and individual adenoma-to-polyp-detection-rate ratio for screening and surveillance colonoscopies: A new approach to quality assessment.通过息肉检出率(PDR)和个体腺瘤与息肉检出率之比预测筛查和监测结肠镜检查中的不良反应(ADR):一种质量评估的新方法。
United European Gastroenterol J. 2017 Aug;5(5):742-749. doi: 10.1177/2050640616675220. Epub 2016 Oct 13.
8
The impact of video recording colonoscopy on adenoma detection rates.录像结肠镜检查对腺瘤检出率的影响。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2012 Jan;75(1):127-33. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.07.048. Epub 2011 Oct 1.
9
Colonoscopy scheduling influences adenoma and polyp detection rates.结肠镜检查的安排会影响腺瘤和息肉的检出率。
Hepatogastroenterology. 2013 Oct;60(127):1647-52.
10
Polyp and adenoma detection rates in the proximal and distal colon.近端结肠和远端结肠的息肉和腺瘤检出率。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2013 Jun;108(6):993-9. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2013.68. Epub 2013 Apr 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Withdrawal time in colonoscopy, past, present, and future, a narrative review.结肠镜检查中的退镜时间:过去、现在与未来,一篇叙述性综述
Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2023 Apr 12;8:19. doi: 10.21037/tgh-23-8. eCollection 2023.
2
Measuring and Improving Quality of Colonoscopy for Colorectal Cancer Screening.测量与提高用于结直肠癌筛查的结肠镜检查质量。
Tech Innov Gastrointest Endosc. 2022;24(3):269-283. doi: 10.1016/j.tige.2021.11.002. Epub 2021 Nov 14.
3
Regular feedback to individual endoscopists is associated with improved adenoma detection rate and other key performance indicators for colonoscopy.

本文引用的文献

1
Adenoma miss rates associated with a 3-minute versus 6-minute colonoscopy withdrawal time: a prospective, randomized trial.腺瘤漏诊率与结肠镜 3 分钟与 6 分钟退镜时间的关系:一项前瞻性、随机试验。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2017 Jun;85(6):1273-1280. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2016.11.030. Epub 2016 Dec 6.
2
Variation in Adenoma Detection Rate and the Lifetime Benefits and Cost of Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Microsimulation Model.腺瘤检出率的变化以及结直肠癌筛查的终生益处和成本:一种微观模拟模型
JAMA. 2015 Jun 16;313(23):2349-58. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.6251.
3
Global cancer statistics, 2012.
定期向个体内镜医师提供反馈与提高结肠镜检查的腺瘤检出率及其他关键绩效指标相关。
Frontline Gastroenterol. 2022 May 6;13(6):509-516. doi: 10.1136/flgastro-2022-102091. eCollection 2022.
4
Factors Associated with Withdrawal Time in European Colonoscopy Practice: Findings of the European Colonoscopy Quality Investigation (ECQI) Group.欧洲结肠镜检查实践中与退镜时间相关的因素:欧洲结肠镜检查质量调查(ECQI)小组的研究结果
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Feb 15;12(2):503. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12020503.
5
Impact of the National Endoscopy Database (NED) on colonoscopy withdrawal time: a tertiary centre experience.国家内镜数据库(NED)对结肠镜退镜时间的影响:一家三级中心的经验。
BMJ Open Gastroenterol. 2021 Jul;8(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjgast-2021-000699.
6
Impact of feedback on adenoma detection rate: a systematic review and meta-analysis.反馈对腺瘤检出率的影响:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Ann Gastroenterol. 2021;34(2):214-223. doi: 10.20524/aog.2021.0591. Epub 2021 Jan 27.
7
Implementing visual cues to improve the efficacy of screening colonoscopy: exploiting the Hawthorne effect.运用视觉线索提高结肠镜筛查效果:利用霍桑效应
Ann Gastroenterol. 2020 Jul-Aug;33(4):374-378. doi: 10.20524/aog.2020.0491. Epub 2020 May 10.
8
The proof is in the pudding: improving adenoma detection rates reduces interval colon cancer development.事实胜于雄辩:提高腺瘤检出率可降低间隔期结肠癌的发生。
Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017 Dec 1;2:99. doi: 10.21037/tgh.2017.11.10. eCollection 2017.
全球癌症统计数据,2012 年。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2015 Mar;65(2):87-108. doi: 10.3322/caac.21262. Epub 2015 Feb 4.
4
Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012.全球癌症发病与死亡:GLOBOCAN 2012 数据源、方法与主要模式。
Int J Cancer. 2015 Mar 1;136(5):E359-86. doi: 10.1002/ijc.29210. Epub 2014 Oct 9.
5
Colonoscopic factors associated with adenoma detection in a national colorectal cancer screening program.在一项全国性结直肠癌筛查项目中与腺瘤检出相关的结肠镜检查因素。
Endoscopy. 2014 Mar;46(3):203-11. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1358831. Epub 2014 Jan 28.
6
Serrated and adenomatous polyp detection increases with longer withdrawal time: results from the New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry.锯齿状和腺瘤性息肉的检出率随退镜时间的延长而增加:来自新罕布什尔州结肠镜检查登记处的结果。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2014 Mar;109(3):417-26. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2013.442. Epub 2014 Jan 7.
7
Colorectal cancer.结直肠癌。
Lancet. 2014 Apr 26;383(9927):1490-1502. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61649-9. Epub 2013 Nov 11.
8
Colonoscopy quality: metrics and implementation.结肠镜检查质量:指标和实施。
Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 2013 Sep;42(3):599-618. doi: 10.1016/j.gtc.2013.05.005.
9
Optimal withdrawal and examination in colonoscopy.结肠镜检查的最佳退出和检查。
Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 2013 Sep;42(3):429-42. doi: 10.1016/j.gtc.2013.05.009. Epub 2013 Jun 15.
10
Postcolonoscopy colorectal cancers are preventable: a population-based study.结肠镜检查后的结直肠癌是可以预防的:一项基于人群的研究。
Gut. 2014 Jun;63(6):957-63. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2013-304880. Epub 2013 Jun 6.