Verloigne Maïté, Altenburg Teatske Maria, Chinapaw Mai Jeanette Maidy, Chastin Sebastien, Cardon Greet, De Bourdeaudhuij Ilse
Research Foundation Flanders, Egmontstraat 1, 1000 Brussel, Belgium.
Department of Movement and Sports Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Watersportlaan 2, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Aug 1;14(8):862. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14080862.
As physical inactivity is particularly prevalent amongst lower-educated adolescent girls, interventions are needed. Using a co-creational approach increases their engagement and might be effective. This study aimed to: (1) describe the co-creation process, (2) evaluate how girls experienced co-creation, and (3) evaluate the effect of the co-creational interventions on physical activity, individual, sociocultural and school-based factors. Three intervention schools (n = 91) and three control schools (n = 105) across Flanders participated. A questionnaire was completed pre (September-October 2014) and post (April-May 2015). In between, sessions with a co-creation group were organised to develop and implement the intervention in each intervention school. Focus groups were conducted to evaluate the co-creational process. School 1 organised sport sessions for girls, school 2 organised a fitness activity and set up a Facebook page, school 3 organised a lunch walk. Girls were positive about having a voice in developing an intervention. No significant effects were found, except for small effects on extracurricular sports participation and self-efficacy. Using a co-creational approach amongst adolescent girls might be a feasible approach. However, as interventions were minimal, effects were limited or undetectable. Future co-creation projects could consider the most optimal co-creation process, evaluation design and intensively test this approach.
由于缺乏体育活动在受教育程度较低的青少年女孩中尤为普遍,因此需要进行干预。采用共同创造的方法可以提高她们的参与度,并且可能会有效果。本研究旨在:(1)描述共同创造过程;(2)评估女孩对共同创造的体验;(3)评估共同创造干预对体育活动、个人、社会文化和学校因素的影响。佛兰德地区的三所干预学校(n = 91)和三所对照学校(n = 105)参与了研究。在2014年9月至10月(干预前)和2015年4月至5月(干预后)完成了问卷调查。在此期间,为每个干预学校组织了共同创造小组会议,以制定和实施干预措施。通过焦点小组评估共同创造过程。学校1为女孩组织了体育活动,学校2组织了健身活动并创建了一个脸书页面,学校3组织了午餐散步活动。女孩们对在制定干预措施中有发言权持积极态度。除了对课外体育活动参与和自我效能有微小影响外,未发现显著效果。在青少年女孩中采用共同创造的方法可能是一种可行的方法。然而,由于干预措施较少,效果有限或难以察觉。未来的共同创造项目可以考虑最优化的共同创造过程、评估设计,并对这种方法进行深入测试。