• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用分布式联想记忆的左角解析会产生惊奇效应和局部性效应。

Left-Corner Parsing With Distributed Associative Memory Produces Surprisal and Locality Effects.

作者信息

Rasmussen Nathan E, Schuler William

机构信息

Department of Linguistics, The Ohio State University.

出版信息

Cogn Sci. 2018 Jun;42 Suppl 4:1009-1042. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12511. Epub 2017 Aug 1.

DOI:10.1111/cogs.12511
PMID:28763111
Abstract

This article describes a left-corner parser implemented within a cognitively and neurologically motivated distributed model of memory. This parser's approach to syntactic ambiguity points toward a tidy account both of surprisal effects and of locality effects, such as the parsing breakdowns caused by center embedding. The model provides an algorithmic-level (Marr, 1982) account of these breakdowns: The structure of the parser's memory and the nature of incremental parsing produce a smooth degradation of processing accuracy for longer center embeddings, and a steeper degradation when they are nested, in line with recall observations by Miller and Isard (1964) and speed-accuracy trade-off observations by McElree et al. (2003). Modeling results show that this effect is distinct from the effects of ambiguity and exceeds the effect of mere sentence length.

摘要

本文描述了一种在基于认知和神经学的分布式记忆模型中实现的左角解析器。该解析器处理句法歧义的方法为意外效应和局部效应提供了一个简洁的解释,比如由中心嵌入导致的解析故障。该模型从算法层面(Marr,1982)对这些故障进行了解释:解析器记忆的结构以及增量解析的性质导致,对于更长的中心嵌入,处理精度会平稳下降;当它们嵌套时,精度下降得更快,这与Miller和Isard(1964)的回忆观察结果以及McElree等人(2003)的速度-准确性权衡观察结果一致。建模结果表明,这种效应与歧义效应不同,且超过了单纯句子长度的影响。

相似文献

1
Left-Corner Parsing With Distributed Associative Memory Produces Surprisal and Locality Effects.使用分布式联想记忆的左角解析会产生惊奇效应和局部性效应。
Cogn Sci. 2018 Jun;42 Suppl 4:1009-1042. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12511. Epub 2017 Aug 1.
2
Investigating locality effects and surprisal in written English syntactic choice phenomena.探究书面英语句法选择现象中的局部性效应和意外性。
Cognition. 2016 Oct;155:204-232. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2016.06.008. Epub 2016 Jul 16.
3
Evaluation of an Algorithmic-Level Left-Corner Parsing Account of Surprisal Effects.算法层面左角剖析对惊讶效应的解释评估。
Cogn Sci. 2024 Oct;48(10):e13500. doi: 10.1111/cogs.13500.
4
Locality and expectation effects in Hindi preverbal constituent ordering.印地语动词前成分语序中的局部性和预期性效应。
Cognition. 2022 Jun;223:104959. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104959. Epub 2022 Jan 25.
5
Effects of Surprisal and Locality on Danish Sentence Processing: An Eye-Tracking Investigation.意外性和局部性对丹麦语句子处理的影响:一项眼动追踪研究。
J Psycholinguist Res. 2017 Oct;46(5):1119-1136. doi: 10.1007/s10936-017-9482-2.
6
Lossy-Context Surprisal: An Information-Theoretic Model of Memory Effects in Sentence Processing.有损失语境惊讶:句子处理中记忆效应的一种信息论模型。
Cogn Sci. 2020 Mar;44(3):e12814. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12814.
7
Expectation-based syntactic comprehension.基于期望的句法理解。
Cognition. 2008 Mar;106(3):1126-77. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.05.006. Epub 2007 Jul 30.
8
Modeling word and morpheme order in natural language as an efficient trade-off of memory and surprisal.将自然语言中的单词和词素顺序建模为记忆和惊讶之间的有效权衡。
Psychol Rev. 2021 Jul;128(4):726-756. doi: 10.1037/rev0000269. Epub 2021 Apr 1.
9
Language structure in the brain: A fixation-related fMRI study of syntactic surprisal in reading.大脑中的语言结构:一项关于阅读中句法意外性的与注视相关的功能磁共振成像研究。
Neuroimage. 2016 May 15;132:293-300. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.02.050. Epub 2016 Feb 22.
10
A model of language processing as hierarchic sequential prediction.语言处理的层级序列预测模型。
Top Cogn Sci. 2013 Jul;5(3):522-40. doi: 10.1111/tops.12034. Epub 2013 Jun 13.

引用本文的文献

1
The structure and statistics of language jointly shape cross-frequency neural dynamics during spoken language comprehension.语言结构和统计学共同塑造了口语理解过程中的跨频神经动力学。
Nat Commun. 2024 Oct 14;15(1):8850. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-53128-1.
2
Large-scale evidence for logarithmic effects of word predictability on reading time.大规模证据表明,单词可预测性对阅读时间的影响呈对数关系。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024 Mar 5;121(10):e2307876121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2307876121. Epub 2024 Feb 29.
3
The Plausibility of Sampling as an Algorithmic Theory of Sentence Processing.
抽样作为句子处理算法理论的合理性。
Open Mind (Camb). 2023 Jul 21;7:350-391. doi: 10.1162/opmi_a_00086. eCollection 2023.
4
Robust Effects of Working Memory Demand during Naturalistic Language Comprehension in Language-Selective Cortex.自然语言理解过程中工作记忆需求对语言选择皮层的强大影响。
J Neurosci. 2022 Sep 28;42(39):7412-7430. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1894-21.2022.
5
Parsing as a Cue-Based Retrieval Model.句法分析作为一种基于线索的检索模型。
Cogn Sci. 2021 Aug;45(8):e13020. doi: 10.1111/cogs.13020.
6
Parsing Model and a Rational Theory of Memory.解析模型与记忆的理性理论。
Front Psychol. 2021 Jun 23;12:657705. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.657705. eCollection 2021.
7
Incremental Language Comprehension Difficulty Predicts Activity in the Language Network but Not the Multiple Demand Network.语言理解难度的逐渐增加可预测语言网络的活动,但不能预测多重需求网络的活动。
Cereb Cortex. 2021 Jul 29;31(9):4006-4023. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhab065.
8
The Domain-General Multiple Demand (MD) Network Does Not Support Core Aspects of Language Comprehension: A Large-Scale fMRI Investigation.域泛型多重需求(MD)网络并不支持语言理解的核心方面:一项大规模 fMRI 研究。
J Neurosci. 2020 Jun 3;40(23):4536-4550. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2036-19.2020. Epub 2020 Apr 21.
9
Lossy-Context Surprisal: An Information-Theoretic Model of Memory Effects in Sentence Processing.有损失语境惊讶:句子处理中记忆效应的一种信息论模型。
Cogn Sci. 2020 Mar;44(3):e12814. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12814.
10
fMRI reveals language-specific predictive coding during naturalistic sentence comprehension.功能磁共振成像揭示了自然语言句子理解过程中的语言特异性预测编码。
Neuropsychologia. 2020 Feb 17;138:107307. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2019.107307. Epub 2019 Dec 24.