Indig Devon, Lee Karen, Grunseit Anne, Milat Andrew, Bauman Adrian
The Australian Prevention Partnership Centre and School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
BMC Public Health. 2017 Aug 1;18(1):68. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4572-5.
To achieve population-wide health improvement, public health interventions found effective in selected samples need to be 'scaled up' and implemented more widely. The pathways through which interventions are scaled up are not well characterised. The aim of this paper is to identify examples of public health interventions which have been scaled up and to develop a conceptual framework which quantifies and describes this process.
A multi-stage international literature search was undertaken to identify examples of public health interventions in high income countries that have been scaled up or implemented at scale. Initial abstract review identified articles which met all the criteria of being a: 1) public health intervention; 2) chronic disease prevention focus; 3) program delivered at a wide geographical scale (state, national or international). Interventions were reviewed and coded into a conceptual framework pathway to document their scaling up process. For each program, an in-depth review of the identified articles was undertaken along with a broad internet based search to determine the outcomes of the dissemination process. A conceptual framework of scaling up pathways was developed that involved four stages (development, efficacy testing, real world trial and dissemination) to which the 40 programs were mapped.
The search identified 40 public health interventions that showed evidence of being scaled up. Four pathways were identified to capture the different scaling up trajectories taken which included: 'Type I - Comprehensive' (55%) which passed through all four stages, 'Type II - Efficacy omitters' (5%) which did not conduct efficacy testing, 'Type III - Trial omitters' (25%) which did not conduct a real world trial, and 'Type IV - At scale dissemination' (15%) which skipped both efficacy testing and a real world trial.
This is the first study to classify and quantify the potential pathways through which public health interventions in high income countries are scaled up to reach the broader population. Mapping these pathways not only demonstrates the different trajectories that occur in scaling up public health interventions, but also allows the variation across scaling up pathways to be classified. The policy and practice determinants leading to each pathway remain for future study, especially to identify the conditions under which efficacy and replication stages are missing.
为实现全民健康改善,在选定样本中被证明有效的公共卫生干预措施需要“扩大规模”并更广泛地实施。干预措施扩大规模的途径尚未得到很好的描述。本文的目的是确定已扩大规模的公共卫生干预措施的实例,并建立一个量化和描述这一过程的概念框架。
进行了多阶段国际文献检索,以确定高收入国家已扩大规模或大规模实施的公共卫生干预措施的实例。初步摘要审查确定了符合以下所有标准的文章:1)公共卫生干预措施;2)以慢性病预防为重点;3)在广泛的地理范围内(州、国家或国际)实施的项目。对干预措施进行审查并编码到一个概念框架路径中,以记录其扩大规模的过程。对于每个项目,对已识别文章进行深入审查,并进行广泛的基于互联网的搜索,以确定传播过程的结果。建立了一个扩大规模路径的概念框架,该框架包括四个阶段(开发、疗效测试、实际应用试验和传播),并将40个项目映射到这些阶段。
检索确定了4个有扩大规模证据的公共卫生干预措施。确定了四条途径来捕捉所采取的不同扩大规模轨迹,包括:“第一类 - 全面型”(55%),经过所有四个阶段;“第二类 - 省略疗效测试型”(5%),未进行疗效测试;“第三类 - 省略实际应用试验型”(25%),未进行实际应用试验;“第四类 - 大规模传播型”(15%),跳过了疗效测试和实际应用试验。
这是第一项对高收入国家公共卫生干预措施扩大规模以惠及更广泛人群的潜在途径进行分类和量化的研究。绘制这些途径不仅展示了公共卫生干预措施扩大规模过程中出现的不同轨迹,还能对扩大规模途径的差异进行分类。导致每条途径的政策和实践决定因素仍有待未来研究,特别是要确定缺少疗效和推广阶段的条件。