• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估非洲卫生系统干预措施的可扩展性:德尔菲研究方案

Assessing the scalability of health system interventions in Africa: protocol for a Delphi study.

作者信息

Karamagi Humphrey Cyprian, Charif Ali Ben, Kidane Solyana Ngusbrhan, Berhane Araia, Nzinga Jacinta, Yohannes Tewelde, Moyo Thandekile Ntombikayise, Sy Sokona, Kipruto Hillary Kipchumba

机构信息

Data Analytics and Knowledge Management, World Health Organization (WHO) Regional Office for Africa, Brazzaville, Republic of Congo.

CubecXpert, Quebec City, QC, Canada.

出版信息

Health Res Policy Syst. 2024 Dec 24;22(1):176. doi: 10.1186/s12961-024-01268-7.

DOI:10.1186/s12961-024-01268-7
PMID:39719642
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11669216/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is widespread enthusiasm for scaling interventions to strengthen health systems. However, little is known about the scalability of such interventions in Africa. In this study, we seek to assess the scalability of interventions for improving the functionality of health systems in Africa, as a key to large-scale implementation strategy of interventions with potential for impact.

METHODS

The study will deploy a multi-pronged approach, grounded in an integrated knowledge translation (iKT) approach. First, a multidisciplinary steering committee will be established, involving key female and male stakeholders in all stages of our study from its inception and as equal members of the research team for overseeing the project. Second, as part of the RAND/University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) Appropriateness Method, evidence from a published systematic review will be used to develop the African Scalability Assessment Framework (AFROSAF), a series of multiple attributes for assessing the ability to scale a health system intervention in Africa. Third, the content of the AFROSAF will be validated using Delphi survey (within a deliberative dialogue) following the Lavis' framework for knowledge transfer and a conceptual framework developed by Boyko et al. a multi-stakeholder consensus exercise with experts from Africa will be convened. The Likert scaled scalability attributes developed will be rated and descriptive statistics and hierarchical cluster analysis will be used to synthesize the data. Finally, document analyses will be conducted to rate to which extent each intervention has data that meet criteria responding to the essential components of scalability using the AFROSAF. We will conduct an analysis to score and rank each intervention for scalability.

DISCUSSION

This project proposes an approach aiming to catalyse the scale of interventions for effective functionality of health systems in Africa. The process will yield a scalability assessment tool for Africa and inventory scalable interventions. The findings will help African countries and policymakers understand the parameters to use and assess health system interventions for scaling.

摘要

背景

人们对扩大干预措施以加强卫生系统有着广泛的热情。然而,对于此类干预措施在非洲的可扩展性知之甚少。在本研究中,我们试图评估改善非洲卫生系统功能的干预措施的可扩展性,这是具有潜在影响力的干预措施大规模实施战略的关键。

方法

本研究将采用多管齐下的方法,以综合知识转化(iKT)方法为基础。首先,将成立一个多学科指导委员会,让关键的女性和男性利益相关者参与我们研究的各个阶段,从研究开始就作为研究团队的平等成员来监督项目。其次,作为兰德公司/加利福尼亚大学洛杉矶分校(UCLA)适宜性方法的一部分,将利用已发表的系统评价中的证据来制定非洲可扩展性评估框架(AFROSAF),这是一系列用于评估在非洲扩大卫生系统干预措施能力的多个属性。第三,将按照拉维斯的知识转移框架和博伊科等人开发的概念框架,通过德尔菲调查(在审议对话中)对AFROSAF的内容进行验证,将与来自非洲的专家召开多利益相关者共识研讨会。将对所制定的李克特量表式可扩展性属性进行评分,并使用描述性统计和层次聚类分析来综合数据。最后,将进行文献分析,以根据AFROSAF对每项干预措施拥有符合可扩展性基本要素标准的数据的程度进行评分。我们将进行分析,对每项干预措施的可扩展性进行评分和排名。

讨论

本项目提出了一种旨在促进扩大干预措施以实现非洲卫生系统有效功能的方法。该过程将产生一个针对非洲的可扩展性评估工具和可扩展干预措施清单。研究结果将帮助非洲国家和政策制定者了解用于扩大卫生系统干预措施的参数并对其进行评估。

相似文献

1
Assessing the scalability of health system interventions in Africa: protocol for a Delphi study.评估非洲卫生系统干预措施的可扩展性:德尔菲研究方案
Health Res Policy Syst. 2024 Dec 24;22(1):176. doi: 10.1186/s12961-024-01268-7.
2
Strategies for involving patients and the public in scaling-up initiatives in health and social services: protocol for a scoping review and Delphi survey.参与健康和社会服务扩大计划的患者和公众的策略:范围综述和德尔菲调查的方案。
Syst Rev. 2021 Feb 11;10(1):55. doi: 10.1186/s13643-021-01597-6.
3
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
4
What matters for the scalability of prejudice reduction programs and interventions? A Delphi study.什么因素对减少偏见项目和干预措施的可扩展性具有重要意义?一项德尔菲研究。
BMC Psychol. 2022 Apr 25;10(1):107. doi: 10.1186/s40359-022-00814-8.
5
Essential items for reporting of scaling studies of health interventions (SUCCEED): protocol for a systematic review and Delphi process.健康干预措施定标研究报告的基本要素(SUCCEED):系统评价和德尔菲法的议定书。
Syst Rev. 2020 Jan 11;9(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s13643-019-1258-3.
6
Sustainability and scalability of a volunteer-based primary care intervention (Health TAPESTRY): a mixed-methods analysis.基于志愿者的初级保健干预措施(健康织锦)的可持续性和可扩展性:一项混合方法分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Aug 1;17(1):514. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2468-9.
7
Development of a core outcome set for oral health services research involving dependent older adults (DECADE): a study protocol.制定一项涉及依赖型老年人口腔健康服务研究的核心结局集(DECADE):研究方案。
Trials. 2020 Jul 1;21(1):599. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04531-8.
8
Engagement of Older Adults Receiving Home Care Services and Their Caregivers in Health Decisions in Partnership With Clinical Teams: Protocol for a Multimethod Study to Prioritize and Culturally Adapt Decision Aids for Home Care.让接受居家护理服务的老年人及其照顾者与临床团队合作参与健康决策:一项多方法研究的方案,旨在为居家护理确定决策辅助工具的优先级并进行文化适应性调整。
JMIR Res Protoc. 2023 Nov 20;12:e53150. doi: 10.2196/53150.
9
Developing a core outcome set for people living with dementia at home in their neighbourhoods and communities: study protocol for use in the evaluation of non-pharmacological community-based health and social care interventions.为居家社区中的痴呆症患者制定核心结局集:用于评估基于社区的非药物健康和社会护理干预措施的研究方案
Trials. 2018 Apr 24;19(1):247. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2584-9.
10
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessing the potential for scaling evidence-based interventions in African health systems: A deliberate dialogue.评估非洲卫生系统扩大循证干预措施的潜力:一次深入对话。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2025 Jul 14;23(1):91. doi: 10.1186/s12961-025-01369-x.

本文引用的文献

1
Evidence on Scaling in Health and Social Care: An Umbrella Review.卫生和社会保健中的扩展规模证据:伞式综述。
Milbank Q. 2023 Sep;101(3):881-921. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12649. Epub 2023 Apr 25.
2
High impact health service interventions for attainment of UHC in Africa: A systematic review.非洲实现全民健康覆盖的高影响力卫生服务干预措施:一项系统综述。
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2022 Sep 23;2(9):e0000945. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0000945. eCollection 2022.
3
Investments for effective functionality of health systems towards Universal Health Coverage in Africa: A scoping review.非洲为实现全民健康覆盖而对卫生系统有效运作进行的投资:一项范围界定审查。
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2022 Sep 23;2(9):e0001076. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0001076. eCollection 2022.
4
Tools for assessing the scalability of innovations in health: a systematic review.评估卫生创新可扩展性的工具:系统评价。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2022 Mar 24;20(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s12961-022-00830-5.
5
A systematic review of adaptations and effectiveness of scaled-up nutrition interventions.一项关于扩大营养干预措施的适应和效果的系统评价。
Nutr Rev. 2022 Mar 10;80(4):962-979. doi: 10.1093/nutrit/nuab096.
6
Analyzing efforts to synergize the global health agenda of universal health coverage, health security and health promotion: a case-study from Ethiopia.分析协同全球卫生议程(全民健康覆盖、卫生安全和健康促进)的努力:来自埃塞俄比亚的案例研究。
Global Health. 2021 Apr 26;17(1):53. doi: 10.1186/s12992-021-00702-7.
7
Towards universal health coverage in the WHO African Region: assessing health system functionality, incorporating lessons from COVID-19.迈向世卫组织非洲区域全民健康覆盖:评估卫生系统功能,吸取新冠疫情教训。
BMJ Glob Health. 2021 Mar;6(3). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-004618.
8
Strengthening the community health program in Liberia: Lessons learned from a health system approach to inform program design and better prepare for future shocks.加强利比里亚社区卫生项目:从卫生系统方法中吸取的经验教训,为项目设计提供信息,并为未来的冲击做好更好的准备。
J Glob Health. 2021 Mar 10;11:07002. doi: 10.7189/jogh.11.07002.
9
Intervention Scalability Assessment Tool: A decision support tool for health policy makers and implementers.干预可扩展性评估工具:为卫生政策制定者和实施者提供决策支持的工具。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2020 Jan 3;18(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s12961-019-0494-2.
10
The pitfalls of scaling up evidence-based interventions in health.将基于证据的干预措施扩大规模的陷阱。
Glob Health Action. 2019;12(1):1670449. doi: 10.1080/16549716.2019.1670449.