James-Martin Genevieve, Davies Chelsie, Riley Malcolm, Poelman Astrid
Health and Biosecurity, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO), Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Health and Biosecurity, CSIRO, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia.
Health Promot J Austr. 2025 Jul;36(3):e70061. doi: 10.1002/hpja.70061.
For widespread and sustained health impacts, community health interventions need to be effective, embedded in regular service delivery and maintained over longer periods.
This review followed the Cochrane Rapid Review method to: (1) characterise Australian community primary prevention interventions that focus on diet improvement and have been delivered at scale; (2) describe the pathway to implementation at scale; and (3) identify the intervention elements that contribute to success and sustainability. Eligible interventions were those (1) delivered to an Australian healthy population group with dietary intake reported; (2) where delivery was by a service or organisation; and (3) where investment in the large-scale delivery of the intervention exceeded research funding. A systematic search was undertaken in three databases for original studies published from 2009 to February 2024. Additional publications relating to the same intervention or programme were also retrieved and extracted. A Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool was used for quality appraisal of primary papers, and narrative synthesis was undertaken to characterise interventions.
Twenty-five programmes met the eligibility criteria, of which 22 were state-based (82% in NSW or Victoria), and 3 were national programmes. Programme settings included primary schools (n = 6), community spaces (n = 5), childcare centres (n = 5), multiple (n = 4), home (n = 3), and other (n = 2). The lead delivery agency for programmes was most often state or local government, or a not-for-profit organisation. Twenty percent of programmes did not demonstrate effectiveness in improving dietary outcomes. Programmes were reported in 3.3 ± 1.7 evaluations (range 1-6). A range of processes was identified for scale-up across programmes including delivery-partner-initiated programmes, researcher-led interventions that were successfully scaled up, and collaborative partnerships. Frequently cited facilitators to scale-up represented inner (e.g., leadership) and outer (e.g., resources) contextual factors, as well as process-related factors and intervention characteristics. The same factors were cited as barriers; however, barriers were cited less frequently.
This study examining the characteristics of real-world community interventions that achieve at-scale delivery found interventions that varied widely in their target population, duration, delivery format, intensity, and development. Most programmes were not scaled-up beyond state boundaries despite Australia's national dietary health challenges, and it is recommended that the barriers to nationwide scalability of programmes be investigated. SO WHAT?: This study highlights the value of closer collaboration between researchers and community health promotion practitioners to strengthen the design and implementation of community health programmes by addressing real-world barriers to uptake and sustainability. Consideration should also be given to how scaled programme models can transcend state boundaries.
为了产生广泛而持续的健康影响,社区健康干预措施需要有效,融入常规服务提供并长期维持。
本综述遵循Cochrane快速综述方法,以:(1)描述澳大利亚以改善饮食为重点并已大规模实施的社区初级预防干预措施;(2)描述大规模实施的途径;(3)确定有助于成功和可持续性的干预要素。符合条件的干预措施是那些:(1)针对有饮食摄入报告的澳大利亚健康人群;(2)由服务机构或组织实施;(3)干预措施大规模实施的投资超过研究资金。在三个数据库中对2009年至2024年2月发表的原始研究进行了系统检索。还检索并提取了与同一干预措施或项目相关的其他出版物。使用混合方法评估工具对主要论文进行质量评估,并进行叙述性综合以描述干预措施。
25个项目符合资格标准,其中22个是基于州的项目(新南威尔士州或维多利亚州占82%),3个是国家项目。项目实施场所包括小学(n = 6)、社区空间(n = 5)、儿童保育中心(n = 5)、多个场所(n = 4)、家庭(n = 3)和其他场所(n = 2)。项目的主要实施机构通常是州或地方政府,或非营利组织。20%的项目在改善饮食结果方面未显示出有效性。项目在3.3 ± 1.7次评估中被报道(范围为1 - 6次)。确定了一系列项目扩大规模的过程,包括由实施伙伴发起的项目、成功扩大规模的研究者主导的干预措施以及合作伙伴关系。经常被提及的扩大规模的促进因素代表内部(如领导力)和外部(如资源)背景因素,以及与过程相关的因素和干预特征。同样的因素也被提及为障碍;然而,障碍被提及的频率较低。
本研究考察了实现大规模实施的现实世界社区干预措施的特征,发现干预措施在目标人群、持续时间、实施形式、强度和发展方面差异很大。尽管澳大利亚面临全国性的饮食健康挑战,但大多数项目并未在州界之外扩大规模,建议对项目在全国范围内扩大规模的障碍进行调查。那又如何?:本研究强调了研究人员与社区健康促进从业者更紧密合作的价值,通过解决实际的采用和可持续性障碍来加强社区健康项目的设计和实施。还应考虑扩大规模的项目模式如何跨越州界。