• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

学习型护理路径框架:一种为患者并与患者共同实施、学习、复制和扩大护理路径的新方法。

Learning Care Pathways Framework: A New Method to Implement, Learn, Replicate, and Scale up Care Pathways for and With the Patient.

作者信息

Gartner Jean-Baptiste, Lemaire Célia, Côté André

机构信息

Département de management, Faculté des sciences de l'administration, Université Laval, Québec City, QC, Canada.

Centre de recherche en gestion des services de santé, Université Laval, Québec City, QC, Canada.

出版信息

Int J Health Policy Manag. 2025;14:8517. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.8517. Epub 2025 Mar 11.

DOI:10.34172/ijhpm.8517
PMID:40767178
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12032254/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although care pathways are a response to the calls for a major change in health system redesign initiatives, very few articles have proposed an implementation method. Indeed, no method exists for large-scale projects of care pathways, as sets of interventions within health systems. Drawing on the systems thinking approach and the pragmatic sociology, we describe the implementation methodology of the Learning Care Pathways (LCP) framework, a method to implement, learn, replicate, and scale up care pathways for and with the patient.

METHODS

The LCP was conceptually developed through a series of literature reviews on key methodological concepts. As a comprehensive, theory-informed approach, the LCP emerged by linking implementation strategies, research methods, learning mechanisms and outcomes dimensions aimed at optimising care pathways.

RESULTS

Designed around 13 steps grouped into five phases, this framework provides implementation strategies, research methods and learning mechanisms, including levers for patient involvement. The pre-implementation phase enables the selection of the pilot project's receiving environment and the design of the project. The implementation phase is designed to co-construct and implement an optimised care pathway based on a scientific analysis of the patient journey, the care pathway perceived by professionals, the care pathway from data and integrating knowledge from international clinical practice guidelines. The post implementation phase aims to demonstrate value creation and set up a learning cycle. The replication phase is designed to repeat the method locally to develop horizontal learning and to evaluate scalability. Finally, the scale up phase aims to repeat the method in other territories to accelerate knowledge creation and develop horizontal and vertical learning.

CONCLUSION

This framework is of particular interest to policy-makers, healthcare managers, and researchers alike, and must be the subject of several experiments to conduct reproducible research that can lead to national Learning Health Systems (LHS).

摘要

背景

尽管护理路径是对卫生系统重新设计倡议中重大变革呼声的回应,但很少有文章提出实施方法。实际上,作为卫生系统内一系列干预措施的护理路径大规模项目不存在实施方法。借鉴系统思维方法和实用社会学,我们描述了学习护理路径(LCP)框架的实施方法,这是一种为患者并与患者一起实施、学习、复制和扩大护理路径的方法。

方法

LCP在概念上是通过对关键方法概念的一系列文献综述而发展起来的。作为一种全面的、基于理论的方法,LCP通过将旨在优化护理路径的实施策略、研究方法、学习机制和结果维度联系起来而形成。

结果

该框架围绕分为五个阶段的13个步骤设计,提供了实施策略、研究方法和学习机制,包括患者参与的杠杆。实施前阶段能够选择试点项目的接收环境并设计项目。实施阶段旨在基于对患者就医过程的科学分析、专业人员感知的护理路径、数据中的护理路径以及整合国际临床实践指南中的知识,共同构建和实施优化的护理路径。实施后阶段旨在展示价值创造并建立学习循环。复制阶段旨在在当地重复该方法以发展横向学习并评估可扩展性。最后,扩大阶段旨在在其他地区重复该方法以加速知识创造并发展横向和纵向学习。

结论

该框架对政策制定者、医疗保健管理人员和研究人员都特别有意义,并且必须成为若干实验的主题,以进行可重复的研究,从而形成国家学习型卫生系统(LHS)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/895f/12032254/b8ee444b7512/ijhpm-14-8517-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/895f/12032254/5aadbce3c40f/ijhpm-14-8517-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/895f/12032254/3e72a250b371/ijhpm-14-8517-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/895f/12032254/21714aae02c1/ijhpm-14-8517-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/895f/12032254/b8ee444b7512/ijhpm-14-8517-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/895f/12032254/5aadbce3c40f/ijhpm-14-8517-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/895f/12032254/3e72a250b371/ijhpm-14-8517-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/895f/12032254/21714aae02c1/ijhpm-14-8517-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/895f/12032254/b8ee444b7512/ijhpm-14-8517-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Learning Care Pathways Framework: A New Method to Implement, Learn, Replicate, and Scale up Care Pathways for and With the Patient.学习型护理路径框架:一种为患者并与患者共同实施、学习、复制和扩大护理路径的新方法。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2025;14:8517. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.8517. Epub 2025 Mar 11.
2
How to Implement Digital Clinical Consultations in UK Maternity Care: the ARM@DA Realist Review.如何在英国产科护理中实施数字临床会诊:ARM@DA实证主义综述
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 May 21:1-77. doi: 10.3310/WQFV7425.
3
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
4
Short-Term Memory Impairment短期记忆障碍
5
Cost-effectiveness of using prognostic information to select women with breast cancer for adjuvant systemic therapy.利用预后信息为乳腺癌患者选择辅助性全身治疗的成本效益
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Sep;10(34):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-204. doi: 10.3310/hta10340.
6
Interventions to improve safe and effective medicines use by consumers: an overview of systematic reviews.改善消费者安全有效用药的干预措施:系统评价概述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Apr 29;2014(4):CD007768. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007768.pub3.
7
Developing a role for patients and the public in the implementation of health and social care research evidence into practice: the PIPER study (Pathways to Implementation for Public Engagement in Research) realist evaluation protocol.让患者和公众在将健康与社会护理研究证据转化为实践中发挥作用:PIPER研究(公众参与研究的实施途径)的实在论评价方案。
Res Involv Engagem. 2025 Jul 14;11(1):80. doi: 10.1186/s40900-025-00728-w.
8
Accreditation through the eyes of nurse managers: an infinite staircase or a phenomenon that evaporates like water.护士长眼中的认证:是无尽的阶梯还是如流水般消逝的现象。
J Health Organ Manag. 2025 Jun 30. doi: 10.1108/JHOM-01-2025-0029.
9
Interventions to improve the use of systematic reviews in decision-making by health system managers, policy makers and clinicians.旨在改善卫生系统管理人员、政策制定者和临床医生在决策过程中对系统评价的使用情况的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Sep 12;2012(9):CD009401. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009401.pub2.
10
Factors that influence participation in physical activity for people with bipolar disorder: a synthesis of qualitative evidence.影响双相障碍患者参与体育活动的因素:定性证据的综合分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Jun 4;6(6):CD013557. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013557.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
Optimization of Care Pathways Through Technological, Clinical, Organizational and Social Innovations: A Qualitative Study.通过技术、临床、组织和社会创新优化护理路径:一项定性研究
Health Serv Insights. 2023 Nov 9;16:11786329231211096. doi: 10.1177/11786329231211096. eCollection 2023.
2
Implementation model for a national learning health system (IMPLEMENT-National LHS): a concept analysis and systematic review protocol.国家学习健康系统实施模型(IMPLEMENT-National LHS):概念分析和系统评价研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Oct 31;13(10):e073767. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-073767.
3
A framework for understanding, designing, developing and evaluating learning health systems.
一个用于理解、设计、开发和评估学习型健康系统的框架。
Learn Health Syst. 2022 May 20;7(1):e10315. doi: 10.1002/lrh2.10315. eCollection 2023 Jan.
4
The updated Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research based on user feedback.基于用户反馈的更新的实施研究综合框架。
Implement Sci. 2022 Oct 29;17(1):75. doi: 10.1186/s13012-022-01245-0.
5
National learning systems to sustain and scale up delivery of quality healthcare: a conceptual framework.国家学习系统以维持和扩大提供优质医疗保健服务的规模:概念框架。
BMJ Glob Health. 2022 Aug;7(8). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2022-008664.
6
Benefits and limitations of business process model notation in modelling patient healthcare trajectory: a scoping review protocol.业务流程模型符号在建模患者医疗保健轨迹中的优势和局限性:范围综述方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 May 30;12(5):e060357. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-060357.
7
Definition and conceptualization of the patient-centered care pathway, a proposed integrative framework for consensus: a Concept analysis and systematic review.定义和概念化以患者为中心的护理路径,一个用于共识的拟议综合框架:概念分析和系统评价。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Apr 26;22(1):558. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-07960-0.
8
Clarifying the concept of a learning health system for healthcare delivery organizations: Implications from a qualitative analysis of the scientific literature.澄清医疗服务组织学习型健康系统的概念:基于科学文献定性分析的启示
Learn Health Syst. 2021 Jul 22;6(2):e10287. doi: 10.1002/lrh2.10287. eCollection 2022 Apr.
9
Tools for assessing the scalability of innovations in health: a systematic review.评估卫生创新可扩展性的工具:系统评价。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2022 Mar 24;20(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s12961-022-00830-5.
10
Dimensions of performance and related key performance indicators addressed in healthcare organisations: A literature review.医疗保健组织中涉及的绩效维度和相关关键绩效指标:文献综述。
Int J Health Plann Manage. 2022 Jul;37(4):1941-1952. doi: 10.1002/hpm.3452. Epub 2022 Mar 14.