McClelland Shearwood, Passias Peter G, Errico Thomas J, Bess R Shay, Protopsaltis Themistocles S
Division of Spine Surgery, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Joint Diseases, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, NY.
Int J Spine Surg. 2017 Apr 3;11(2):11. doi: 10.14444/4011. eCollection 2017.
Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is one of the most common operations utilized to address pathology of the cervical spine. Few reports have attempted to compare complications associated with inpatient versus outpatient ACDF.
The Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) from 2001-2012 and the State Ambulatory Services Database (SASD) for New Jersey (NJ) from 2003-2012 were used for analysis. Patients receiving ACDF (defined as anterior cervical fusion (ICD-0 code=81.02) + excision of intervertebral disc (80.51)) were segmented into an inpatient group derived from the NIS, and an outpatient group derived from the NJ SASD. Patients receiving > 2 levels fused (ICD-9 codes 81.63-81.64), or surgery for cancer (ICD-9 codes 140-239), or trauma (ICD-9 codes=805.0-806.9) were excluded. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to adjust the analysis for patient age, race, sex, primary payer for care, and number of medical diagnoses.
Of the 94,492,438 inpatients comprising the NIS from 2001-2012, 257,398 received ACDF. Of the 4,194,207 outpatients comprising the NJ SASD, 2,016 received ACDF. PSM of 10,080 patients (all 2,016 SASD and 8,064 from NIS) was performed, and subsequent analysis revealed that durotomy (P=0.001;OR=0.81), paraplegia, postoperative infection, hematoma/seroma (OR=0.14), respiratory complications, acute posthemorrhagic anemia and red blood cell transfusion (all P<0.001) were less frequent in outpatient versus inpatient ACDF (p<0.05). These results were similar to an unmatched analysis involving all of the NIS patients.
Accepting the limitations of the NIS and SASD (inability to distinguish between one and two-level fusions, no long-term follow-up, potential selection bias, disparities between inpatient and outpatient ACDF populations), these findings indicate that for 1-2 level ACDF, perioperative complications, including durotomy, paraplegia, hematoma, and acute posthemorrhagic anemia were more commonly reported following inpatient ACDF. Future studies involving outpatient analysis of several states will be necessary to determine whether these results of outpatient ACDF are applicable nationwide.
颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术(ACDF)是治疗颈椎疾病最常用的手术之一。很少有报告尝试比较住院与门诊ACDF相关的并发症。
使用2001 - 2012年的全国住院患者样本(NIS)和2003 - 2012年新泽西州(NJ)的州门诊服务数据库(SASD)进行分析。接受ACDF(定义为颈椎前路融合术(ICD - 0编码=81.02)+椎间盘切除术(80.51))的患者被分为来自NIS的住院组和来自NJ SASD的门诊组。接受超过2节段融合(ICD - 9编码81.63 - 81.64)、癌症手术(ICD - 9编码140 - 239)或创伤手术(ICD - 9编码=805.0 - 806.9)的患者被排除。倾向得分匹配(PSM)用于调整患者年龄、种族、性别、主要护理支付者和医疗诊断数量的分析。
在2001 - 2012年构成NIS的94,492,438名住院患者中,257,398人接受了ACDF。在构成NJ SASD的4,194,207名门诊患者中,2,016人接受了ACDF。对10,080名患者(所有2,016名SASD患者和8,064名来自NIS的患者)进行了PSM,随后的分析显示,与住院ACDF相比,门诊ACDF中硬脊膜切开术(P = 0.001;OR = 0.81)、截瘫、术后感染、血肿/血清肿(OR = 0.14)、呼吸并发症、急性出血后贫血和红细胞输血(所有P < 0.001)的发生率较低(P < 0.05)。这些结果与对所有NIS患者进行的未匹配分析相似。
尽管认识到NIS和SASD的局限性(无法区分单节段和双节段融合、无长期随访、潜在选择偏倚、住院和门诊ACDF人群之间的差异),这些发现表明,对于1 - 2节段ACDF,住院ACDF后围手术期并发症,包括硬脊膜切开术、截瘫、血肿和急性出血后贫血的报告更为常见。未来有必要对多个州的门诊患者进行研究,以确定门诊ACDF的这些结果是否适用于全国。