• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与初级保健医生共同决策相关的因素:一项多中心横断面研究的结果。

Factors associated with shared decision making among primary care physicians: Findings from a multicentre cross-sectional study.

机构信息

CHU de Québec Research Centre, Quebec, QC, Canada.

Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Laval University, Quebec, QC, Canada.

出版信息

Health Expect. 2018 Feb;21(1):212-221. doi: 10.1111/hex.12603. Epub 2017 Aug 2.

DOI:10.1111/hex.12603
PMID:28768060
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5750688/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Despite growing recognition that shared decision making (SDM) is central for patient-centred primary care, adoption by physicians remains limited in routine practice.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the characteristics of physicians, patients and consultations associated with primary care physicians' SDM behaviours during routine care.

METHODS

A multicentre cross-sectional survey study was conducted with 114 unique patient-physician dyads recruited from 17 primary care clinics in Quebec and Ontario, Canada. Physicians' SDM behaviours were assessed with the 12-item OPTION scale scored by third observers using audio-recordings of consultations. Independent variables included 21 physician, patient and consultation characteristics. We assessed factors associated with OPTION scores using multivariate linear regression models.

RESULTS

On the OPTION scale, where higher scores indicated greater SDM behaviours, physicians earned an overall mean score of 25.7±9.8 of 100. In the final adjusted regression model, higher OPTION scores were associated with physicians' social participation (involvement in one committee β=5.75, P=.04; involvement in two or more committees β=7.74, P=.01), patients' status as employed (β=6.48, P=.02), clinically significant decisional conflict in patients (β=7.15, P=.002) and a longer duration of consultations (β=0.23, P=.002).

CONCLUSION

Physicians' social participation, patients' employment status and decisional conflict and the duration of consultations were associated with primary care physicians' SDM behaviours in routine care. These factors should be considered when designing strategies to implement SDM and promote more patient-centred care in primary care.

摘要

背景

尽管越来越多的人认识到共享决策(SDM)是患者为中心的初级保健的核心,但医生在常规实践中的采用仍然有限。

目的

研究与初级保健医生在常规护理中进行 SDM 行为相关的医生、患者和咨询的特征。

方法

这是一项多中心横断面调查研究,在加拿大魁北克省和安大略省的 17 个初级保健诊所招募了 114 对独特的医患二人组。使用第三方观察者对咨询的录音进行评估,使用 12 项 OPTION 量表来评估医生的 SDM 行为。独立变量包括 21 名医生、患者和咨询特征。我们使用多变量线性回归模型评估与 OPTION 评分相关的因素。

结果

在 OPTION 量表上,得分越高表示 SDM 行为越多,医生的总平均得分为 25.7±9.8(满分 100)。在最终调整的回归模型中,较高的 OPTION 评分与医生的社会参与度(参与一个委员会β=5.75,P=.04;参与两个或更多委员会β=7.74,P=.01)、患者的就业状态(β=6.48,P=.02)、患者临床显著的决策冲突(β=7.15,P=.002)和咨询时间延长(β=0.23,P=.002)有关。

结论

医生的社会参与、患者的就业状况、决策冲突和咨询时间与初级保健医生在常规护理中的 SDM 行为有关。在设计实施 SDM 和促进初级保健中以患者为中心的护理的策略时,应考虑这些因素。

相似文献

1
Factors associated with shared decision making among primary care physicians: Findings from a multicentre cross-sectional study.与初级保健医生共同决策相关的因素:一项多中心横断面研究的结果。
Health Expect. 2018 Feb;21(1):212-221. doi: 10.1111/hex.12603. Epub 2017 Aug 2.
2
Observer Ratings of Shared Decision Making Do Not Match Patient Reports: An Observational Study in 5 Family Medicine Practices.观察者对共享决策的评估与患者报告不符:5 家家庭医学实践中的观察性研究。
Med Decis Making. 2021 Jan;41(1):51-59. doi: 10.1177/0272989X20977885.
3
Shared decision making in routine clinical care of patients with rheumatoid arthritis: an assessment of audio-recorded consultations.类风湿关节炎患者常规临床护理中的共同决策:对录音咨询的评估。
Ann Rheum Dis. 2020 Feb;79(2):170-175. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2019-216137. Epub 2019 Oct 29.
4
Patients' and physicians' gender and perspective on shared decision-making: A cross-sectional study from Dubai.患者和医生的性别以及对共同决策的看法:来自迪拜的一项横断面研究。
PLoS One. 2022 Sep 1;17(9):e0270700. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0270700. eCollection 2022.
5
Shared decision making, physicians' explanations, and treatment satisfaction: a cross-sectional survey of prostate cancer patients.共同决策、医生的解释与治疗满意度:一项针对前列腺癌患者的横断面调查。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2020 Dec 14;20(1):334. doi: 10.1186/s12911-020-01355-z.
6
Impact of DECISION + 2 on patient and physician assessment of shared decision making implementation in the context of antibiotics use for acute respiratory infections.DECISION + 2 对急性呼吸道感染抗生素使用背景下共享决策实施中患者和医生评估的影响。
Implement Sci. 2013 Dec 26;8:144. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-8-144.
7
Association between physicians' and patients' perspectives of shared decision making in primary care settings in Japan: The impact of environmental factors.日本初级保健环境中医生和患者对共同决策的看法之间的关联:环境因素的影响。
PLoS One. 2021 Feb 10;16(2):e0246518. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246518. eCollection 2021.
8
Exploration of shared decision-making processes among dieticians and patients during a consultation for the nutritional treatment of dyslipidaemia.血脂异常营养治疗咨询期间营养师与患者共同决策过程的探索。
Health Expect. 2015 Dec;18(6):2764-75. doi: 10.1111/hex.12250. Epub 2014 Aug 18.
9
Toward shared decision making: using the OPTION scale to analyze resident-patient consultations in family medicine.迈向共同决策:使用 OPTION 量表分析家庭医学中的医患咨询。
Acad Med. 2011 Aug;86(8):1010-8. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31822220c5.
10
A skills network approach to physicians' competence in shared decision making.技能网络方法在医生共同决策能力中的应用。
Health Expect. 2020 Dec;23(6):1466-1476. doi: 10.1111/hex.13130. Epub 2020 Sep 1.

引用本文的文献

1
General practitioners' perceptions on decision aids in healthcare: a qualitative study in Portugal.全科医生对医疗保健中决策辅助工具的看法:葡萄牙的一项定性研究。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2025 Jun 2;25(1):202. doi: 10.1186/s12911-025-03044-1.
2
Shared Decision-Making in Physical Therapist Care for People With Shoulder Problems: An Observer-Based Analysis of Audio-Recorded Consultations.物理治疗师对肩部问题患者的共同决策:基于观察的录音会诊分析
Phys Ther. 2025 Jun 2;105(6). doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzaf047.
3
Impact of Online Interactive Decision Tools on Women's Decision-Making Regarding Breast Cancer Screening: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.在线交互式决策工具对女性乳腺癌筛查决策的影响:系统评价与荟萃分析
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jan 29;27:e65974. doi: 10.2196/65974.
4
Using Adaptive Choice-Based Conjoint Approach to Facilitate Shared Decision-Making in Osteoarthritis Management: A Patient Perception Study.运用基于适应性选择的联合分析方法促进骨关节炎管理中的共同决策:一项患者认知研究。
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2025 Feb;77(2):240-250. doi: 10.1002/acr.25429. Epub 2024 Oct 17.
5
Would shared decision-making be useful in breast cancer screening programmes? A qualitative study using focus group discussions to gather evidence from French women with different socioeconomic backgrounds.在乳腺癌筛查项目中,共同决策是否有用?一项使用焦点小组讨论从具有不同社会经济背景的法国女性中收集证据的定性研究。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Feb 7;24(1):404. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-17876-5.
6
Patients' and GPs' views and expectations of home monitoring with a pulse oximeter: a mixed-methods process evaluation of a pilot randomised controlled trial.患者及全科医生对使用脉搏血氧仪进行家庭监测的看法和期望:一项试点随机对照试验的混合方法过程评估
Br J Gen Pract. 2023 Nov 30;73(737):e894-e902. doi: 10.3399/BJGP.2023.0139. Print 2023 Dec.
7
Shared decision making on mode of delivery following a prior cesarean delivery in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.坦桑尼亚达累斯萨拉姆市剖宫产后分娩方式的共享决策。
PLoS One. 2023 Oct 26;18(10):e0291809. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0291809. eCollection 2023.
8
Perinatal Education Participation: Description and Identification of Disparities.围产期教育参与情况:差异描述与识别
J Perinat Educ. 2022 Jul 1;31(3):161-170. doi: 10.1891/JPE-2021-0009.
9
Reaching a Tipping Point: A Qualitative Exploration of Quality of Life and Treatment Decision-Making in People Living With Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia.达到临界点:良性前列腺增生患者生活质量和治疗决策的定性探讨。
Qual Health Res. 2022 Nov;32(13):1979-1992. doi: 10.1177/10497323221129262. Epub 2022 Sep 26.
10
Exploring motivations and resistances for implementing shared decision-making in clinical practice: A systematic review based on a structure-process-outcome model.探索在临床实践中实施共享决策的动机和阻力:基于结构-过程-结果模型的系统评价。
Health Expect. 2022 Aug;25(4):1254-1268. doi: 10.1111/hex.13541. Epub 2022 Jun 5.