• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

日本初级保健环境中医生和患者对共同决策的看法之间的关联:环境因素的影响。

Association between physicians' and patients' perspectives of shared decision making in primary care settings in Japan: The impact of environmental factors.

机构信息

Department of Home Care and Regional Liaison Promotion, National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology of Japan, Obu, Japan.

Department of Medical Education Studies, International Research Center for Medical Education, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Bunkyo-ku, Japan.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2021 Feb 10;16(2):e0246518. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246518. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0246518
PMID:33566830
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7875412/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Shared decision-making (SDM) has only lately begun attaining recognition from the Japanese medical community. The purpose of this study was to create a Japanese version of the SDM-Q-Doc, which is a scale that measures SDM from the perspective of physicians, and to clarify its psychometric characteristics and identify the issues and factors that affect SDM.

METHODS

The participants were 23 physicians and 130 patients who visited primary care clinics in Japan for the first time. Immediately following physician-patient interviews, the Japanese version of SDM-Q-9 and SDM-Q-Doc were administered to patients and physicians, respectively. For convergent validity, physician confidence in the medical interview (PCMI) was used. After the determination of internal consistency and validity of the SDM-Q-Doc, the relations among each item of SDM-Q-Doc, SDM-Q-9, physicians' sociodemographic attributes, and a presence or absence of nurse's attendance during outpatient consultation were assessed by a multiple regression analysis and structural equation modeling (SEM).

RESULTS

A factor analysis confirmed that the Japanese version of the SDM-Q-Doc displays a one-factor structure with a high internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.87, ω = 0.88). The correlation between the PCMI and SDM-Q-Doc confirmed an appropriate convergent validity (r = 0.406; p < 0.001). Multiple regression analyses showed that the attendance of a nurse during consultation significantly affected one item of the SDM-Q-Doc, which in turn affected one item of the SDM-Q-9. SEM showed a good fit of model for these three items.

CONCLUSION

The Japanese version of the SDM-Q-Doc's internal consistency and validity in the outpatient medical consultations in Japan were confirmed. Further, this study suggests the role of a nurse's attendance during a physician-patient consultation on facilitating the SDM. Further, using the Japanese version of the SDM-Q-Doc will promote communication skills training for medical professionals by checking the quality of SDM.

摘要

目的

共享决策(SDM)最近才开始得到日本医学界的认可。本研究的目的是创建一个测量医生视角下的 SDM 的 SDM-Q-Doc 的日语版,并明确其心理测量学特征,确定影响 SDM 的问题和因素。

方法

参与者为 23 名医生和 130 名首次到日本基层医疗机构就诊的患者。在医患访谈结束后,立即为患者和医生分别使用 SDM-Q-9 和 SDM-Q-Doc 的日语版。为了进行收敛效度检验,使用了医生对医疗访谈的信心(PCMI)。在确定 SDM-Q-Doc 的内部一致性和有效性后,通过多元回归分析和结构方程建模(SEM)评估了 SDM-Q-Doc 的每个项目与 SDM-Q-9、医生的社会人口统计学特征以及门诊咨询时是否有护士参与之间的关系。

结果

因子分析证实,SDM-Q-Doc 的日语版具有较高的内部一致性(Cronbach's α = 0.87,ω = 0.88),呈单因素结构。PCMI 与 SDM-Q-Doc 的相关性证实了适当的收敛效度(r = 0.406;p < 0.001)。多元回归分析显示,咨询时护士的参与显著影响了 SDM-Q-Doc 的一个项目,进而影响了 SDM-Q-9 的一个项目。SEM 显示,这三个项目的模型拟合良好。

结论

本研究在日本的门诊医疗咨询中验证了 SDM-Q-Doc 的日语版的内部一致性和有效性。此外,本研究表明,咨询时护士的参与在促进 SDM 方面发挥了作用。此外,使用 SDM-Q-Doc 的日语版将通过检查 SDM 的质量来促进医疗专业人员的沟通技巧培训。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e3b4/7875412/f8f4b87cc552/pone.0246518.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e3b4/7875412/0d3064e98e30/pone.0246518.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e3b4/7875412/b57e0e5e3649/pone.0246518.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e3b4/7875412/f74b1bbfc0f8/pone.0246518.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e3b4/7875412/f8f4b87cc552/pone.0246518.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e3b4/7875412/0d3064e98e30/pone.0246518.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e3b4/7875412/b57e0e5e3649/pone.0246518.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e3b4/7875412/f74b1bbfc0f8/pone.0246518.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e3b4/7875412/f8f4b87cc552/pone.0246518.g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Association between physicians' and patients' perspectives of shared decision making in primary care settings in Japan: The impact of environmental factors.日本初级保健环境中医生和患者对共同决策的看法之间的关联:环境因素的影响。
PLoS One. 2021 Feb 10;16(2):e0246518. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246518. eCollection 2021.
2
Dutch Translation and Psychometric Testing of the 9-Item Shared Decision Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9) and Shared Decision Making Questionnaire-Physician Version (SDM-Q-Doc) in Primary and Secondary Care.9项共同决策问卷(SDM-Q-9)和共同决策问卷-医生版(SDM-Q-Doc)在初级和二级医疗保健中的荷兰语翻译及心理测量测试
PLoS One. 2015 Jul 7;10(7):e0132158. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0132158. eCollection 2015.
3
Development and psychometric properties of the Shared Decision Making Questionnaire--physician version (SDM-Q-Doc).共享决策问卷-医师版(SDM-Q-Doc)的制定和心理测量特性。
Patient Educ Couns. 2012 Aug;88(2):284-90. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2012.03.005. Epub 2012 Apr 3.
4
Adapting the patient and physician versions of the 9-item shared decision making questionnaire for other healthcare providers in Japan.将9项共同决策调查问卷的患者版和医生版改编用于日本的其他医疗服务提供者。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2021 Nov 11;21(1):314. doi: 10.1186/s12911-021-01683-8.
5
Testing psychometric properties of Shared Decision Making Questionnaire - Physician Version (SDM-Q-Doc) in an Italian real-world psychiatric clinical sample.测试共享决策问卷-医生版(SDM-Q-Doc)在意大利真实精神科临床样本中的心理计量学特性。
Riv Psichiatr. 2023 Jul-Aug;58(4):167-174. doi: 10.1708/4064.40479.
6
Validity and reliability of the 9-item Shared Decision Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9) in a national survey in Hungary.匈牙利全国性调查中 9 项共享决策问卷(SDM-Q-9)的有效性和可靠性。
Eur J Health Econ. 2019 Jun;20(Suppl 1):43-55. doi: 10.1007/s10198-019-01061-2. Epub 2019 May 20.
7
Psychometric Evaluation of the Japanese 9-Item Shared Decision-Making Questionnaire and Its Association with Decision Conflict and Patient Factors in Japanese Primary Care.日本9项共同决策问卷的心理测量学评价及其与日本初级保健中决策冲突和患者因素的关联
JMA J. 2020 Jul 15;3(3):208-215. doi: 10.31662/jmaj.2019-0069. Epub 2020 Jul 7.
8
Comparing the nine-item Shared Decision-Making Questionnaire to the OPTION Scale - an attempt to establish convergent validity.比较九项共享决策问卷与 OPTION 量表——尝试建立聚合效度。
Health Expect. 2015 Feb;18(1):137-50. doi: 10.1111/hex.12022. Epub 2012 Nov 26.
9
Validation of SDM-Q-Doc Questionnaire to measure shared decision-making physician's perspective in oncology practice.验证 SDM-Q-Doc 问卷以衡量肿瘤学实践中医生的共享决策观点。
Clin Transl Oncol. 2017 Nov;19(11):1312-1319. doi: 10.1007/s12094-017-1671-9. Epub 2017 May 11.
10
The relationship between evaluation of shared decision-making by pet owners and veterinarians and satisfaction with veterinary consultations.宠物主人和兽医对共同决策评估的关系与兽医咨询满意度之间的关系。
BMC Vet Res. 2022 Aug 2;18(1):296. doi: 10.1186/s12917-022-03401-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of bipolar disorder patients' evaluation of their treatment in 2015 and 2022.双相情感障碍患者在2015年和2022年对其治疗的评价比较。
PCN Rep. 2025 May 1;4(2):e70109. doi: 10.1002/pcn5.70109. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
Exploring Patient Preferences Related to Shared Decision-Making in Chronic Disease Management.探索慢性病管理中与共同决策相关的患者偏好
Cureus. 2024 Sep 25;16(9):e70214. doi: 10.7759/cureus.70214. eCollection 2024 Sep.
3
Using Adaptive Choice-Based Conjoint Approach to Facilitate Shared Decision-Making in Osteoarthritis Management: A Patient Perception Study.

本文引用的文献

1
Psychometric Evaluation of the Japanese 9-Item Shared Decision-Making Questionnaire and Its Association with Decision Conflict and Patient Factors in Japanese Primary Care.日本9项共同决策问卷的心理测量学评价及其与日本初级保健中决策冲突和患者因素的关联
JMA J. 2020 Jul 15;3(3):208-215. doi: 10.31662/jmaj.2019-0069. Epub 2020 Jul 7.
2
Decision making and cancer.决策与癌症。
Am Psychol. 2015 Feb-Mar;70(2):105-18. doi: 10.1037/a0036834.
3
Where is the evidence? A systematic review of shared decision making and patient outcomes.
运用基于适应性选择的联合分析方法促进骨关节炎管理中的共同决策:一项患者认知研究。
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2025 Feb;77(2):240-250. doi: 10.1002/acr.25429. Epub 2024 Oct 17.
4
Practice Guidelines for Bipolar Disorder by the JSMD (Japanese Society of Mood Disorders).《日本心境障碍学会双相障碍治疗指南》
Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2024 Nov;78(11):633-645. doi: 10.1111/pcn.13724. Epub 2024 Aug 28.
5
An Exploratory Study of Issues in Training Facilitators for Online Training in Advance Care Planning: Mixed Methods Research.预先护理计划在线培训培训促进者问题的探索性研究:混合方法研究
Nurs Rep. 2024 Apr 19;14(2):1000-1013. doi: 10.3390/nursrep14020075.
6
One third of physicians discuss exit strategies with patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: Results from nationwide surveys among German and Polish neurologists.三分之一的医生会与肌萎缩侧索硬化症患者讨论退出策略:德国和波兰神经科医生全国性调查结果。
Brain Behav. 2024 Jan 6;14(2):e3243. doi: 10.1002/brb3.3243.
7
Factors influencing shared decision-making in long-term care facilities.影响长期护理机构中共同决策的因素。
BMC Geriatr. 2023 Sep 19;23(1):577. doi: 10.1186/s12877-023-04301-6.
8
Evaluation of an Advanced Care Planning Training Program Incorporating Online Skills in Shared Decision Making: A Preintervention and Postintervention Comparative Study.一项纳入共享决策在线技能的高级护理计划培训项目评估:一项干预前与干预后对比研究。
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 May 8;11(9):1356. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11091356.
9
The factors affecting implementing shared decision-making in clinical trials: a cross-sectional survey of clinical research coordinators' perceptions in Japan.影响临床试验中实施共享决策的因素:日本临床研究协调员认知的横断面调查。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2023 Feb 23;23(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s12911-023-02138-y.
10
Validation of the Novel Interprofessional Shared Decision-Making Questionnaire to Facilitate Multidisciplinary Team Building in Patient-Centered Care.新型跨专业共享决策问卷在以患者为中心的照护中促进多学科团队建设的验证。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 21;19(22):15349. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192215349.
证据何在?共享决策制定与患者预后的系统评价。
Med Decis Making. 2015 Jan;35(1):114-31. doi: 10.1177/0272989X14551638. Epub 2014 Oct 28.
4
Resident physicians' attitudes and confidence in communicating with patients: a pilot study at a Japanese university hospital.住院医师与患者沟通的态度和信心:日本一所大学医院的一项试点研究。
Patient Educ Couns. 2014 Sep;96(3):361-6. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2014.05.012. Epub 2014 May 23.
5
A latent variable framework for modeling dyadic measures in research on shared decision-making.用于共享决策研究中二元测量建模的潜在变量框架。
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2012;106(4):253-63. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2012.03.021. Epub 2012 Apr 23.
6
Development and psychometric properties of the Shared Decision Making Questionnaire--physician version (SDM-Q-Doc).共享决策问卷-医师版(SDM-Q-Doc)的制定和心理测量特性。
Patient Educ Couns. 2012 Aug;88(2):284-90. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2012.03.005. Epub 2012 Apr 3.
7
Shared decision making and other variables as correlates of satisfaction with health care decisions in a United States national survey.在一项美国全国性调查中,共享决策和其他变量与医疗保健决策满意度的相关性。
Patient Educ Couns. 2012 Jul;88(1):100-5. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2012.02.010. Epub 2012 Mar 11.
8
A conceptual framework for interprofessional shared decision making in home care: protocol for a feasibility study.家庭护理中跨专业共享决策的概念框架:一项可行性研究方案。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2011 Jan 31;11:23. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-11-23.
9
Interpersonal perception in the context of doctor-patient relationships: a dyadic analysis of doctor-patient communication.医患关系中的人际知觉:医患沟通的二元分析。
Soc Sci Med. 2010 Mar;70(5):763-8. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.10.065. Epub 2009 Dec 11.
10
The 9-item Shared Decision Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9). Development and psychometric properties in a primary care sample.9 项共享决策问卷(SDM-Q-9)。在初级保健样本中的开发和心理测量特性。
Patient Educ Couns. 2010 Jul;80(1):94-9. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2009.09.034. Epub 2009 Oct 30.