Roy Charlotte, Wiebusch Dennis, Botsch Mario, Ernst Marc O
Faculty for Computer Science, Engineering & Psychology.
Graphics & Geometry Group.
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2023 Feb;152(2):448-463. doi: 10.1037/xge0001279. Epub 2022 Sep 1.
Visual landmarks provide crucial information for human navigation. But what characteristics define a landmark? To be uniquely recognized, a landmark should be distinctive and salient, while providing precise and accurate positional information. It should also be permanent. For example, to find back to your car, a nearby church seems a better landmark compared with a distinct truck or bicycle, because you learned that there is a chance that these objects might move. To this end, we investigated human learning of landmark permanency for navigation while treating spatiotemporal permanency as a probabilistic property. We hypothesized that humans will be able to learn the probabilistic nature of landmark permanency and assign higher weight to more permanent landmarks. To test this hypothesis, we designed a homing task where participants had to return to a position that was surrounded by three landmarks. In the learning phase we manipulated the spatiotemporal permanency of one landmark by secretly repositioning it before participants returned home. In the test phase, we investigated the weight allocated to the nonpermanent landmark by analyzing its influence on the navigational performance during homing. We conducted four experiments: In the first two experiments we altered the statistics of permanency and accordingly found an influence on participants' behavior, nonpermanent objects were used less for finding home. In the last two experiments we investigated the role of short-term learning of novel statistics versus long-term knowledge about such statistics. No carry-over effects in Experiment 3 and very little influence of object identity with different long-term permanency characteristics in Experiment 4 revealed a dominance of short-term learning over the use of long-term a priori knowledge about object permanency. This indicates that long-term prior beliefs are quickly updated by the current permanency statistics. Taken together, consistent with a Bayesian account for navigation these results indicate that humans quickly learn and update the statistics of landmark permanency and use it in an effective way, assigning gradually more weight to the more permanent landmark and making it more important for navigation. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).
视觉地标为人类导航提供关键信息。但什么样的特征能定义一个地标呢?为了被独特地识别,一个地标应该是独特且显著的,同时提供精确准确的位置信息。它还应该是永久性的。例如,为了找到回到你的车的路,与一辆独特的卡车或自行车相比,附近的一座教堂似乎是一个更好的地标,因为你知道这些物体有可能移动。为此,我们在将时空永久性视为一种概率属性的同时,研究了人类对用于导航的地标永久性的学习。我们假设人类将能够学习地标永久性的概率性质,并为更永久性的地标赋予更高的权重。为了验证这一假设,我们设计了一个归巢任务,参与者必须回到一个被三个地标环绕的位置。在学习阶段,我们通过在参与者回家之前秘密重新定位其中一个地标来操纵其时空永久性。在测试阶段,我们通过分析其对归巢过程中导航性能的影响来研究分配给非永久性地标的权重。我们进行了四个实验:在前两个实验中,我们改变了永久性的统计数据,并相应地发现了对参与者行为的影响,非永久性物体在找家时使用得更少。在最后两个实验中,我们研究了对新统计数据的短期学习与关于此类统计数据的长期知识的作用。实验3中没有遗留效应,实验4中具有不同长期永久性特征的物体身份影响很小,这表明短期学习优于对物体永久性的长期先验知识的使用。这表明长期的先验信念会被当前的永久性统计数据迅速更新。综上所述,与贝叶斯导航理论一致,这些结果表明人类能够快速学习和更新地标永久性的统计数据,并以一种有效的方式使用它,逐渐为更永久性的地标赋予更多权重,使其在导航中变得更加重要。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c)2023美国心理学会,保留所有权利)