Hu Zhonghua, Gendron Maria, Liu Qiang, Zhao Guang, Li Hong
Research Center of Brain and Cognitive Neuroscience, Liaoning Normal UniversityDalian, China.
Department of Psychology, Northeastern University, BostonMA, United States.
Front Psychol. 2017 Jul 14;8:1186. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01186. eCollection 2017.
Facial expression and gaze direction play an important role in social communication. Previous research has demonstrated the perception of anger is enhanced by direct gaze, whereas, it is unclear whether perception of fear is enhanced by averted gaze. In addition, previous research has shown the anxiety affects the processing of facial expression and gaze direction, but hasn't measured or controlled for depression. As a result, firm conclusions cannot be made regarding the impact of individual differences in anxiety and depression on perceptions of face expressions and gaze direction. The current study attempted to reexamine the effect of the anxiety level on the processing of facial expressions and gaze direction by matching participants on depression scores. A reliable psychophysical index of the range of eye gaze angles judged as being directed at oneself [the cone of direct gaze (CoDG)] was used as the dependent variable in this study. Participants were stratified into high/low trait anxiety groups and asked to judge the gaze of angry, fearful, and neutral faces across a range of gaze directions. The result showed: (1) the perception of gaze direction was influenced by facial expression and this was modulated by trait anxiety. For the high trait anxiety group, the CoDG for angry expressions was wider than for fearful and neutral expressions, and no significant difference emerged between fearful and neutral expressions; For the low trait anxiety group, the CoDG for both angry and fearful expressions was wider than for neutral, and no significant difference emerged between angry and fearful expressions. (2) Trait anxiety modulated the perception of gaze direction only in the fearful condition, such that the fearful CoDG for the high trait anxiety group was narrower than the low trait anxiety group. This demonstrated that anxiety distinctly affected gaze perception in expressions that convey threat (angry, fearful), such that a high trait anxiety level modulated the impact of indirectly threatening expressions (fearful), and did not influence responses to directly threatening expression (angry). These findings partially support the .
面部表情和注视方向在社交沟通中起着重要作用。先前的研究表明,直接注视会增强对愤怒的感知,而对于回避注视是否会增强对恐惧的感知尚不清楚。此外,先前的研究表明焦虑会影响对面部表情和注视方向的处理,但未对抑郁进行测量或控制。因此,关于焦虑和抑郁的个体差异对面部表情和注视方向感知的影响,无法得出确凿的结论。本研究试图通过使参与者的抑郁得分相匹配,重新审视焦虑水平对面部表情和注视方向处理的影响。本研究将一个可靠的心理物理学指标——被判断为指向自己的注视角度范围[直接注视锥(CoDG)]——用作因变量。参与者被分为高/低特质焦虑组,并被要求判断一系列注视方向上愤怒、恐惧和中性面孔的注视情况。结果显示:(1)注视方向的感知受面部表情影响,且这种影响受特质焦虑调节。对于高特质焦虑组,愤怒表情的CoDG比恐惧表情和中性表情的更宽,恐惧表情和中性表情之间没有显著差异;对于低特质焦虑组,愤怒表情和恐惧表情的CoDG都比中性表情的更宽,愤怒表情和恐惧表情之间没有显著差异。(2)特质焦虑仅在恐惧条件下调节注视方向的感知,使得高特质焦虑组的恐惧CoDG比低特质焦虑组的更窄。这表明焦虑明显影响传达威胁的表情(愤怒、恐惧)中的注视感知,即高特质焦虑水平调节间接威胁表情(恐惧)的影响,而不影响对直接威胁表情(愤怒) 的反应。这些发现部分支持了……