• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Attention shifting in the context of emotional faces: Disentangling neural mechanisms of irritability from anxiety.情绪面孔背景下的注意转移:从焦虑中分离出易怒的神经机制。
Depress Anxiety. 2020 Jul;37(7):645-656. doi: 10.1002/da.23010. Epub 2020 Apr 6.
2
Association of Irritability and Anxiety With the Neural Mechanisms of Implicit Face Emotion Processing in Youths With Psychopathology.易怒和焦虑与有精神病理学问题的青少年内隐面部情绪加工神经机制的关联
JAMA Psychiatry. 2017 Jan 1;74(1):95-103. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2016.3282.
3
A Latent Variable Approach to Differentiating Neural Mechanisms of Irritability and Anxiety in Youth.一种潜在变量方法,用于区分青少年烦躁和焦虑的神经机制。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2018 Jun 1;75(6):631-639. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2018.0468.
4
Context-dependent amygdala-prefrontal connectivity during the dot-probe task varies by irritability and attention bias to angry faces.在点探测任务中,杏仁核-前额叶连接随易激惹性和对愤怒面孔的注意偏向而变化。
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2022 Dec;47(13):2283-2291. doi: 10.1038/s41386-022-01307-3. Epub 2022 Jun 1.
5
Attention bias to threat faces in severe mood dysregulation.严重情绪失调中对威胁面孔的注意偏向。
Depress Anxiety. 2014 Jul;31(7):559-65. doi: 10.1002/da.22145. Epub 2013 Jun 24.
6
Brain Mechanisms of Attention Orienting Following Frustration: Associations With Irritability and Age in Youths.挫折后注意定向的大脑机制:与青少年的易激惹和年龄的关系。
Am J Psychiatry. 2019 Jan 1;176(1):67-76. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2018.18040491. Epub 2018 Oct 19.
7
Neural and behavioral correlates of inhibitory control in youths with varying levels of irritability.具有不同易激惹水平的青少年抑制控制的神经和行为相关性。
J Affect Disord. 2020 Aug 1;273:567-575. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.04.049. Epub 2020 May 11.
8
Attention bias to negative versus non-negative faces is related to negative affectivity in a transdiagnostic youth sample.在一个跨诊断的青少年样本中,对负面面孔与非负面面孔的注意偏向与负性情感有关。
J Psychiatr Res. 2021 Jun;138:514-518. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2021.04.036. Epub 2021 May 1.
9
Multi-method assessment of irritability and differential linkages to neurophysiological indicators of attention allocation to emotional faces in young children.采用多种方法评估易激惹性,并对幼儿情绪面孔注意分配的神经生理指标进行差异关联分析。
Dev Psychobiol. 2020 Jul;62(5):600-616. doi: 10.1002/dev.21930. Epub 2019 Oct 20.
10
Systematic Review and Meta-analysis: Task-based fMRI Studies in Youths With Irritability.系统评价和荟萃分析:基于任务的 fMRI 研究青少年易激惹。
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2023 Feb;62(2):208-229. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2022.05.014. Epub 2022 Aug 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Deep learning identification of reward-related neural substrates of preadolescent irritability: A novel 3D CNN application for fMRI.深度学习识别青春期前易怒情绪相关的神经基质:一种用于功能磁共振成像的新型三维卷积神经网络应用
Neuroimage Rep. 2025 Apr 14;5(2):100259. doi: 10.1016/j.ynirp.2025.100259. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
Understanding irritability through the lens of self-regulatory control processes in children and adolescents: a systematic review.从儿童和青少年自我调节控制过程的角度理解易怒情绪:一项系统综述。
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2025 May;34(5):1497-1509. doi: 10.1007/s00787-024-02591-8. Epub 2024 Oct 8.
3
An Expanded Conceptual Framework for Understanding Irritability in Childhood: The Role of Cognitive Control Processes.一个用于理解儿童烦躁情绪的扩展概念框架:认知控制过程的作用。
Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev. 2024 Jun;27(2):381-406. doi: 10.1007/s10567-024-00489-0. Epub 2024 Jun 10.
4
Keeping up with the kids: the value of co-production in the study of irritability in youth depression and its underlying neural circuitry.跟上孩子们的步伐:共同参与式研究在青少年抑郁症易激惹性及其潜在神经回路研究中的价值
Front Behav Neurosci. 2023 Jun 15;17:1124940. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2023.1124940. eCollection 2023.
5
Systematic Review and Meta-analysis: Task-based fMRI Studies in Youths With Irritability.系统评价和荟萃分析:基于任务的 fMRI 研究青少年易激惹。
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2023 Feb;62(2):208-229. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2022.05.014. Epub 2022 Aug 6.
6
Executive functioning moderates neural mechanisms of irritability during reward processing in youth.执行功能调节青少年奖励加工过程中易怒的神经机制。
Psychiatry Res Neuroimaging. 2022 Jul;323:111483. doi: 10.1016/j.pscychresns.2022.111483. Epub 2022 Apr 17.
7
Bullying Perpetration and Victimization in Youth: Associations with Irritability and Anxiety.青少年中的欺凌行为和受害情况:与易怒和焦虑的关联。
Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 2022 Oct;53(5):1075-1082. doi: 10.1007/s10578-021-01192-9. Epub 2021 May 23.
8
Neural mechanisms of reward processing in adolescent irritability.青少年易激惹中奖励处理的神经机制。
Dev Psychobiol. 2021 Jul;63(5):1241-1254. doi: 10.1002/dev.22090. Epub 2021 Jan 18.

本文引用的文献

1
Neural and behavioral correlates of inhibitory control in youths with varying levels of irritability.具有不同易激惹水平的青少年抑制控制的神经和行为相关性。
J Affect Disord. 2020 Aug 1;273:567-575. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.04.049. Epub 2020 May 11.
2
fMRI replicability depends upon sufficient individual-level data.功能磁共振成像的可重复性取决于足够的个体水平数据。
Commun Biol. 2019 Apr 12;2:130. doi: 10.1038/s42003-019-0378-6. eCollection 2019.
3
Levels of early-childhood behavioral inhibition predict distinct neurodevelopmental pathways to pediatric anxiety.儿童早期行为抑制水平可预测儿童焦虑的不同神经发育途径。
Psychol Med. 2020 Jan;50(1):96-106. doi: 10.1017/S0033291718003999. Epub 2019 Jan 8.
4
Psychosocial Treatment of Irritability in Youth.青少年易怒情绪的心理社会治疗
Curr Treat Options Psychiatry. 2018 Mar;5(1):129-140. doi: 10.1007/s40501-018-0141-5. Epub 2018 Feb 9.
5
A Latent Variable Approach to Differentiating Neural Mechanisms of Irritability and Anxiety in Youth.一种潜在变量方法,用于区分青少年烦躁和焦虑的神经机制。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2018 Jun 1;75(6):631-639. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2018.0468.
6
Biobehavioral Markers of Attention Bias Modification in Temperamental Risk for Anxiety: A Randomized Control Trial.气质性焦虑风险的注意偏向矫正的生物行为学标记:一项随机对照试验。
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2018 Feb;57(2):103-110. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2017.11.016. Epub 2017 Nov 28.
7
Trait Anxiety Impacts the Perceived Gaze Direction of Fearful But Not Angry Faces.特质焦虑影响对恐惧面孔而非愤怒面孔的注视方向感知。
Front Psychol. 2017 Jul 14;8:1186. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01186. eCollection 2017.
8
Brief Behavioral Therapy for Pediatric Anxiety and Depression in Primary Care: A Randomized Clinical Trial.初级保健中儿童焦虑和抑郁的简短行为疗法:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2017 Jun 1;74(6):571-578. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2017.0429.
9
Irritability in Youths: A Translational Model.青少年易激惹:转化模型。
Am J Psychiatry. 2017 Jun 1;174(6):520-532. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2016.16070839. Epub 2017 Jan 20.
10
Association of Irritability and Anxiety With the Neural Mechanisms of Implicit Face Emotion Processing in Youths With Psychopathology.易怒和焦虑与有精神病理学问题的青少年内隐面部情绪加工神经机制的关联
JAMA Psychiatry. 2017 Jan 1;74(1):95-103. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2016.3282.

情绪面孔背景下的注意转移:从焦虑中分离出易怒的神经机制。

Attention shifting in the context of emotional faces: Disentangling neural mechanisms of irritability from anxiety.

机构信息

San Diego State University/University of California, San Diego, Joint Doctoral Program in Clinical Psychology, San Diego, California.

Department of Psychology, San Diego State University, San Diego, California.

出版信息

Depress Anxiety. 2020 Jul;37(7):645-656. doi: 10.1002/da.23010. Epub 2020 Apr 6.

DOI:10.1002/da.23010
PMID:32253797
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8312255/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Irritability predicts concurrent and prospective psychiatric disorders across the lifespan. Anxiety commonly co-occurs with irritability, and such comorbidity complicates care. Understanding the mechanisms of comorbid traits is necessary to inform treatment decisions. This study aimed to disentangle neural mechanisms of irritability from anxiety in the context of attentional shifting toward and away from emotional faces in youths from treatment-seeking families.

METHODS

Youths (N = 45), mean age = 14.01 years (standard deviation = 1.89) completed a dot-probe task during functional magnetic resonance imaging acquisition. Whole-brain activation analyses evaluated the effect of irritability on neural reactivity in the context of varying attentional shifting toward and away from emotional faces, both depending on and above and beyond anxiety (i.e., with anxiety as [a] a moderator and [b] a covariate, respectively).

RESULTS

Higher irritability levels related to distinct task-related patterns of cuneus activation, depending on comorbid anxiety levels. Increased irritability also related to distinct task-related patterns of parietal, temporal, occipital, and cerebellar activation, controlling for anxiety. Overall, youths with higher levels of irritability evinced more pronounced fluctuations in neural reactivity across task conditions.

CONCLUSION

The present study contributes to a literature delineating the unique and shared neural mechanisms of overlapping symptom dimensions, which will be necessary to ultimately build a brain- and behavior-based nosology that forms the basis for more targeted and effective treatments.

摘要

背景

易激惹可预测整个生命周期中同时存在和未来出现的精神障碍。焦虑通常与易激惹共病,这种共病使治疗变得复杂。了解共病特征的神经机制对于告知治疗决策是必要的。本研究旨在从注意力向和远离情绪面孔转移的角度,在寻求治疗的家庭的青少年中,从焦虑中分离出易激惹的神经机制。

方法

共有 45 名青少年(平均年龄 14.01 岁,标准差 1.89)在功能磁共振成像采集期间完成了点探测任务。全脑激活分析评估了易激惹对情绪面孔的注意力向和远离过程中神经反应性的影响,这既取决于焦虑(即作为[ a ]调节变量和[ b ]协变量),也超越了焦虑。

结果

更高的易激惹水平与不同的扣带回激活模式相关,这取决于共病的焦虑水平。增加的易激惹也与顶叶、颞叶、枕叶和小脑的不同任务相关的激活模式相关,同时控制了焦虑。总的来说,易激惹水平较高的青少年在整个任务条件下表现出更明显的神经反应波动。

结论

本研究有助于阐明重叠症状维度的独特和共享神经机制的文献,这对于最终建立基于大脑和行为的分类学,为更有针对性和有效的治疗奠定基础是必要的。