Ngambi Peslie G, Kalungia Aubrey C, Law Michael R, Kalemeera Francis, Truter IIse, Godman Brian, Munkombwe Derick
a Manchester Centre for Health Economics , University of Manchester , Manchester , UK.
b Department of Pharmacy , University of Zambia , Lusaka , Zambia.
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2017 Oct;17(5):459-467. doi: 10.1080/14737167.2017.1364161. Epub 2017 Aug 11.
The 2016 World Health Organization (WHO) consolidated guideline recommends lifelong antiretroviral therapy (ART) for all HIV-infected pregnant and breastfeeding women for preventing mother-to-child HIV transmission (PMTCT). Ambiguity remains about the cost-effectiveness of this strategy in resource-limited developing countries. Areas covered: We reviewed model-based studies on the cost-effectiveness of lifelong ART (formerly Option B+) relative to previous WHO guidelines for PMTCT. Our search using PubMed, Medline and Google Scholar for articles on Option B+ resulted in the final inclusion of seven studies published between 2012 and 2016. The Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) checklist was used to assess the quality of reporting. Outcomes of interest, which included infant infections averted, maternal quality and length of life, and the Incremental Cost Effectiveness Ratio (ICER), were used in comparing cost-effectiveness. Expert commentary: Despite most model-based studies favouring lifelong ART (Option B+) in terms of its cost-effectiveness in comparison to Options A and B, inclusiveness of the evidence remains weak for generalization. This is largely because setting specificity for providing lifelong ART to all pregnant and breastfeeding women may differ significantly in each setting. Consequently, future cost-effectiveness studies should be robust, setting-specific, and endeavor to assess the willingness and ability to pay of each setting.
2016年世界卫生组织(WHO)综合指南建议,为预防母婴传播艾滋病毒(PMTCT),所有感染艾滋病毒的孕妇和哺乳期妇女应接受终身抗逆转录病毒治疗(ART)。在资源有限的发展中国家,这一策略的成本效益仍不明确。涵盖领域:我们回顾了基于模型的研究,这些研究对比了终身抗逆转录病毒治疗(原方案B+)与WHO先前的预防母婴传播艾滋病毒指南的成本效益。我们使用PubMed、Medline和谷歌学术搜索关于方案B+的文章,最终纳入了2012年至2016年发表的七项研究。采用综合卫生经济评价报告标准(CHEERS)清单评估报告质量。在比较成本效益时,使用了感兴趣的结果,包括避免婴儿感染、孕产妇生活质量和寿命,以及增量成本效益比(ICER)。专家评论:尽管大多数基于模型的研究表明,与方案A和B相比,终身抗逆转录病毒治疗(方案B+)在成本效益方面更具优势,但证据的包容性仍然薄弱,难以推广。这主要是因为在每个地区,为所有孕妇和哺乳期妇女提供终身抗逆转录病毒治疗的地区特异性可能存在显著差异。因此,未来的成本效益研究应该更加稳健、针对具体地区,并努力评估每个地区的支付意愿和支付能力。