• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

全飞秒激光微小切口基质透镜切除术(SMILE)与准分子原位角膜磨镶术(LASEK)治疗高度近视术后视觉质量比较:1年随访结果

Comparison of postoperative visual quality after SMILE and LASEK for high myopia: A 1-year outcome.

作者信息

Zhu Xiaoyu, Zou Leilei, Yu Manrong, Qiu Chen, Chen Minjie, Dai Jinhui

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, Eye and ENT Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.

Key Laboratory of Myopia, Ministry of Health, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2017 Aug 3;12(8):e0182251. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0182251. eCollection 2017.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0182251
PMID:28771544
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5542625/
Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare the 1-year outcome of visual quality after laser-assisted subepithelial keratomileusis (LASEK) and femtosecond laser-assisted small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) for high myopia correction.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This prospective, comparative study included 24 eyes of 24 patients in the LASEK group, with a mean spherical equivalent (SE) of -7.59 ± 1.32 diopters, and 26 eyes of 26 patients in the SMILE group, with a mean SE of -7.91 ± 1.08 diopters. Visual acuity, corneal topography, contrast sensitivity (CS), and wavefront aberrations were recorded preoperatively and compared with postoperative measurements. Objective scatter index (OSI) and modulation transfer function (MTF) cut-off frequency were measured 1 year postoperatively.

RESULTS

One year postoperatively, the two groups demonstrated no significant difference in the CS at all spatial frequencies. The increments of higher-order aberrations (HOAs) (HOA = 0.583 ± 0.210 μm), including spherical aberration (SA) (SA = 0.546 ± 0.249 μm), were higher (P < 0.05) in the LASEK group than those in the SMILE group (HOA = 0.451 ± 0.143 μm; SA = 0.450 ± 0.340 μm) after surgery. There were no significant differences in the increments of coma and trefoil aberrations between the two groups. The OSI and MTF cut-off frequency exhibited no significant differences between the two groups postoperatively. No vision-threatening complications were noted at any stage in either group.

CONCLUSIONS

Both LASEK and SMILE are safe and effective surgical options for the correction of high myopia. SMILE has a lower HOAs and SA induction rate 1 year postoperatively.

摘要

目的

比较准分子激光上皮下角膜磨镶术(LASEK)和飞秒激光小切口基质透镜切除术(SMILE)矫正高度近视后1年的视觉质量结果。

材料与方法

这项前瞻性比较研究纳入了LASEK组的24例患者的24只眼,平均等效球镜度(SE)为-7.59±1.32屈光度,以及SMILE组的26例患者的26只眼,平均SE为-7.91±1.08屈光度。术前记录视力、角膜地形图、对比敏感度(CS)和波前像差,并与术后测量值进行比较。术后1年测量客观散射指数(OSI)和调制传递函数(MTF)截止频率。

结果

术后1年,两组在所有空间频率的CS方面均无显著差异。LASEK组术后高阶像差(HOA)(HOA = 0.583±0.210μm)的增加,包括球差(SA)(SA = 0.546±0.249μm),高于SMILE组(HOA = 0.451±0.143μm;SA = 0.450±0.340μm)(P < 0.05)。两组之间彗差和三叶草像差的增加无显著差异。术后两组的OSI和MTF截止频率无显著差异。两组在任何阶段均未发现威胁视力的并发症。

结论

LASEK和SMILE都是矫正高度近视的安全有效的手术选择。SMILE术后1年的高阶像差和球差诱导率较低。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/159c/5542625/f845702d5e7b/pone.0182251.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/159c/5542625/c4be44e8a3bd/pone.0182251.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/159c/5542625/f845702d5e7b/pone.0182251.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/159c/5542625/c4be44e8a3bd/pone.0182251.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/159c/5542625/f845702d5e7b/pone.0182251.g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison of postoperative visual quality after SMILE and LASEK for high myopia: A 1-year outcome.全飞秒激光微小切口基质透镜切除术(SMILE)与准分子原位角膜磨镶术(LASEK)治疗高度近视术后视觉质量比较:1年随访结果
PLoS One. 2017 Aug 3;12(8):e0182251. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0182251. eCollection 2017.
2
Comparison of Visual Quality After SMILE and LASEK for Mild to Moderate Myopia.SMILE 和 LASEK 治疗轻度至中度近视的视觉质量比较。
J Refract Surg. 2015 Dec;31(12):795-800. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20151111-02.
3
Comparative study of wave-front aberration and corneal Asphericity after SMILE and LASEK for myopia: a short and long term study.飞秒激光微小切口基质透镜切除术(SMILE)和准分子激光上皮下角膜磨镶术(LASEK)治疗近视后波前像差与角膜非球面性的对比研究:短期和长期研究
BMC Ophthalmol. 2019 Mar 20;19(1):80. doi: 10.1186/s12886-019-1084-3.
4
Long-term visual quality after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and laser assisted subepithelial keratomileusis (LASEK) for low myopia.小切口微透镜取出术(SMILE)和激光辅助上皮下角膜磨镶术(LASEK)治疗低度近视的长期视觉质量。
BMC Ophthalmol. 2022 Aug 18;22(1):347. doi: 10.1186/s12886-022-02568-8.
5
Comparison of femtosecond laser small-incision lenticule extraction and laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy to correct myopic astigmatism.飞秒激光小切口基质透镜切除术与准分子激光上皮下角膜磨镶术矫正近视散光的比较。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015 Nov;41(11):2476-86. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2015.05.043.
6
Visual Outcomes After SMILE, LASEK, and LASEK Combined With Corneal Collagen Cross-Linking for High Myopic Correction.全飞秒激光微小切口基质透镜切除术、准分子激光上皮下角膜磨镶术以及准分子激光上皮下角膜磨镶术联合角膜胶原交联术治疗高度近视后的视觉效果
Cornea. 2017 Apr;36(4):399-405. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000001089.
7
Comparison of Higher-Order Aberrations after LASEK between Two Different Laser Platforms for Low-to-Moderate Myopia.两种不同激光平台用于治疗低中度近视的 LASEK 术后高阶像差比较。
Curr Eye Res. 2020 Sep;45(9):1036-1042. doi: 10.1080/02713683.2020.1726404. Epub 2020 Feb 23.
8
Effect of Iris registration on visual outcome in wavefront-guided LASEK for myopic astigmatism.虹膜定位对波前引导的准分子激光上皮下角膜磨镶术治疗近视散光视觉效果的影响。
Int Ophthalmol. 2018 Apr;38(2):513-525. doi: 10.1007/s10792-017-0486-6. Epub 2017 Mar 11.
9
Comparison of biomechanical effects of small incision lenticule extraction and laser-assisted subepithelial keratomileusis.小切口透镜切除术与准分子激光上皮下角膜磨镶术生物力学效应的比较
Acta Ophthalmol. 2016 Nov;94(7):e586-e591. doi: 10.1111/aos.13035. Epub 2016 Apr 29.
10
Clinical Outcomes After SMILE and Femtosecond Laser-Assisted LASIK for Myopia and Myopic Astigmatism: A Prospective Randomized Comparative Study.全飞秒激光微小切口基质透镜切除术和飞秒激光制瓣准分子原位角膜磨镶术治疗近视及近视散光的临床疗效:一项前瞻性随机对照研究
Cornea. 2016 Feb;35(2):210-6. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000000707.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of changes in objective visual quality based on tear film stability after SMILE surgery.基于全飞秒激光微小切口基质透镜切除术(SMILE)术后泪膜稳定性的客观视觉质量变化评估。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Apr 25;12:1538359. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1538359. eCollection 2025.
2
Comparison of visual outcomes and optical aberrations after SMILE with intraoperative Kappa angle adjustments between small and large Kappa angles.比较小 Kappa 角和大 Kappa 角的 SMILE 术中 Kappa 角调整后视觉效果和像差的差异。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jun 24;14(1):14551. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-65366-w.
3
Comparative visual outcomes of the first versus second eye following small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE).

本文引用的文献

1
Early changes to dry eye and ocular surface after small-incision lenticule extraction for myopia.近视小切口透镜切除术术后干眼和眼表的早期变化
Int J Ophthalmol. 2016 Apr 18;9(4):575-9. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2016.04.17. eCollection 2016.
2
Objective and subjective visual quality after implantation of all optic zone diffractive multifocal intraocular lenses: a prospective, case-control observational study.全光学区衍射多焦点人工晶状体植入术后的客观和主观视觉质量:一项前瞻性病例对照观察研究。
Br J Ophthalmol. 2016 Nov;100(11):1530-1535. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2015-307135. Epub 2016 Feb 22.
3
Global Prevalence of Myopia and High Myopia and Temporal Trends from 2000 through 2050.
SMILE 术后第一眼与第二眼的对比视觉效果。
BMC Ophthalmol. 2024 Apr 11;24(1):158. doi: 10.1186/s12886-024-03414-9.
4
Comparison of Corneal Densitometry and Visual Quality after Small Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE) and Laser Epithelial Keratomileusis (LASEK): One-Year Comparative Study.SMILE 和 LASEK 术后 1 年角膜密度与视觉质量比较的对比研究。
Biomed Res Int. 2023 Feb 2;2023:3430742. doi: 10.1155/2023/3430742. eCollection 2023.
5
Comparison of objective and subjective visual quality after flapless laser vision correction for mild to moderate myopia: SMILE vs PRK.无瓣飞秒激光角膜基质透镜切除术与准分子激光角膜表面切削术治疗轻中度近视的客观与主观视觉质量比较:SMILE 与 PRK。
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2023 Jun;261(6):1731-1741. doi: 10.1007/s00417-022-05937-7. Epub 2023 Jan 18.
6
Long-term visual quality after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and laser assisted subepithelial keratomileusis (LASEK) for low myopia.小切口微透镜取出术(SMILE)和激光辅助上皮下角膜磨镶术(LASEK)治疗低度近视的长期视觉质量。
BMC Ophthalmol. 2022 Aug 18;22(1):347. doi: 10.1186/s12886-022-02568-8.
7
Initial Single-Site Surgical Experience with SMILE: A Comparison of Results to FDA SMILE, and the Earliest and Latest Generation of LASIK.飞秒激光小切口基质透镜切除术的单眼初始手术经验:与美国食品药品监督管理局批准的飞秒激光小切口基质透镜切除术以及最早和最新一代准分子原位角膜磨镶术结果的比较
Ophthalmol Ther. 2018 Dec;7(2):347-360. doi: 10.1007/s40123-018-0137-7. Epub 2018 Jun 29.
8
Three-year results of small incision lenticule extraction and wavefront-guided femtosecond laser-assisted laser keratomileusis for correction of high myopia and myopic astigmatism.小切口透镜切除术与波前引导飞秒激光原位角膜磨镶术矫正高度近视和近视散光的三年结果
Int J Ophthalmol. 2018 Mar 18;11(3):470-477. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2018.03.18. eCollection 2018.
全球近视和高度近视的患病率及 2000 至 2050 年的时间趋势。
Ophthalmology. 2016 May;123(5):1036-42. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.01.006. Epub 2016 Feb 11.
4
Comparison of Visual Quality After SMILE and LASEK for Mild to Moderate Myopia.SMILE 和 LASEK 治疗轻度至中度近视的视觉质量比较。
J Refract Surg. 2015 Dec;31(12):795-800. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20151111-02.
5
Efficacy, predictability and safety of small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE).小切口飞秒透镜切除术(SMILE)的疗效、可预测性及安全性
Eye Vis (Lond). 2015 Aug 31;2:14. doi: 10.1186/s40662-015-0024-4. eCollection 2015.
6
Visual Outcomes and Optical Quality After Femtosecond Laser Small Incision Lenticule Extraction: An 18-Month Prospective Study.飞秒激光小切口基质透镜切除术的视觉效果和光学质量:一项为期18个月的前瞻性研究。
J Refract Surg. 2015 Nov;31(11):726-31. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20151021-01.
7
One-year outcomes of small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE): mild to moderate myopia vs. high myopia.小切口微透镜切除术(SMILE)治疗 1 年的结果:轻度至中度近视与高度近视的比较。
BMC Ophthalmol. 2015 Jun 10;15:59. doi: 10.1186/s12886-015-0051-x.
8
Postoperative ocular higher-order aberrations and contrast sensitivity: femtosecond lenticule extraction versus pseudo small-incision lenticule extraction.术后眼高阶像差和对比敏感度:飞秒透镜切除术与准小切口透镜切除术的比较
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015 Mar;41(3):623-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2014.07.032.
9
Comparison of visual and refractive outcomes following femtosecond laser- assisted lasik with smile in patients with myopia or myopic astigmatism.飞秒激光辅助 LASIK 联合 Smile 手术治疗近视或近视散光患者的视力和屈光效果比较。
J Refract Surg. 2014 Sep;30(9):590-6. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20140814-02.
10
Optical quality and intraocular scattering after femtosecond laser small incision lenticule extraction.飞秒激光小切口角膜基质透镜取出术后的光学质量和眼内散射。
J Refract Surg. 2014 May;30(5):296-302. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20140415-02.