Stawarczyk Bogna, Schmid Philipp, Roos Malgorzata, Eichberger Marlis, Schmidlin Patrick R
Department of Prosthodontics, Dental School, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Goethestrasse 70, Munich 80336, Germany.
Clinic of Preventive Dentistry, Periodontology and Cariology, Center of Dental Medicine, University of Zurich, Plattenstrasse 11, Zurich 8032, Switzerland.
Materials (Basel). 2016 Jun 20;9(6):491. doi: 10.3390/ma9060491.
This study investigated the colorimetric properties of different veneering materials on core materials. Standardized specimens (10 mm × 10 mm × 1.5 mm) reflecting four core (polyetheretherketone (PEEK), zirconia (ZrO₂), cobalt-chromium-molybdenum alloy (CoCrMo), and titanium oxide (TiO₂); thickness: 1.5 mm) and veneering materials (VITA Mark II, IPS e.max CAD, LAVA Ultimate and VITA Enamic, all in shade A3; thickness: 0.5, 1.0, 1.5 and 2 mm, respectively) were fabricated. Specimens were superimposed to assemblies, and the color was determined with a spectrophotometer (CieLab-System) or a chair-side color measurement device (VITA EasyShade), respectively. Data were analyzed using three-, two-, and one-way ANOVA, a Chi²-test, and a Wilson approach ( < 0.05). The measurements with EasyShade showed A2 for VITA Mark II, A3.5 for VITA Enamic, B2 for LAVA Ultimate, and B3 for IPS e.max CAD. LabE-values showed significant differences between the tested veneering materials ( < 0.001). CieLab-System and VITA EasyShade parameters of the different assemblies showed a significant impact of core ( < 0.001), veneering material ( < 0.001), and thickness of the veneering material ( < 0.001). PEEK as core material showed comparable outcomes as compared to ZrO₂ and CoCrMo, with respect to CieLab-System parameters for each veneering material. The relative frequency of the measured VITA EasyShade parameters regarding PEEK cores also showed comparable results as compared to the gold standard CoCrMo, regardless of the veneering material used.
本研究调查了不同饰面材料在核材料上的比色特性。制备了反映四种核材料(聚醚醚酮(PEEK)、氧化锆(ZrO₂)、钴铬钼合金(CoCrMo)和二氧化钛(TiO₂);厚度:1.5毫米)和饰面材料(VITA Mark II、IPS e.max CAD、LAVA Ultimate和VITA Enamic,均为A3色;厚度分别为0.5、1.0、1.5和2毫米)的标准化试样(10毫米×10毫米×1.5毫米)。将试样叠加成组件,分别用分光光度计(CieLab系统)或椅旁颜色测量装置(VITA EasyShade)测定颜色。使用三因素、二因素和单因素方差分析、卡方检验和威尔逊方法(<0.05)对数据进行分析。使用EasyShade测量的结果显示,VITA Mark II为A2,VITA Enamic为A3.5,LAVA Ultimate为B2,IPS e.max CAD为B3。LabE值在测试的饰面材料之间显示出显著差异(<0.001)。不同组件的CieLab系统和VITA EasyShade参数显示,核材料(<0.001)、饰面材料(<0.001)和饰面材料厚度(<0.001)有显著影响。就每种饰面材料的CieLab系统参数而言,PEEK作为核材料显示出与ZrO₂和CoCrMo相当的结果。无论使用何种饰面材料,关于PEEK核的测量VITA EasyShade参数的相对频率与金标准CoCrMo相比也显示出相当的结果。