School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia.
Hunter Medical Research Institute, Newcastle, NSW, Australia.
Sci Rep. 2017 Aug 3;7(1):7198. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-06864-y.
Intrinsic Optical Signal (IOS) imaging has been used extensively to examine activity-related changes within the cerebral cortex. A significant technical challenge with IOS imaging is the presence of large noise, artefact components and periodic interference. Signal processing is therefore important in obtaining quality IOS imaging results. Several signal processing techniques have been deployed, however, the performance of these approaches for IOS imaging has never been directly compared. The current study aims to compare signal processing techniques that can be used when quantifying stimuli-response IOS imaging data. Data were gathered from the somatosensory cortex of mice following piezoelectric stimulation of the hindlimb. The effectiveness of each technique to remove noise and extract the IOS signal was compared for both spatial and temporal responses. Careful analysis of the advantages and disadvantages of each method were carried out to inform the choice of signal processing for IOS imaging. We conclude that spatial Gaussian filtering is the most effective choices for improving the spatial IOS response, whilst temporal low pass and bandpass filtering produce the best results for producing temporal responses when periodic stimuli are an option. Global signal regression and truncated difference also work well and do not require periodic stimuli.
内源光学信号(IOS)成像已被广泛用于研究大脑皮层活动相关的变化。IOS 成像的一个重大技术挑战是存在大量噪声、伪影成分和周期性干扰。因此,信号处理对于获得高质量的 IOS 成像结果非常重要。已经部署了几种信号处理技术,但是,这些方法在 IOS 成像中的性能从未被直接比较过。本研究旨在比较可用于量化刺激-反应 IOS 成像数据的信号处理技术。数据是从小鼠的躯体感觉皮层中收集的,这些数据是在对后肢进行压电刺激后获得的。比较了每种技术在空间和时间响应中去除噪声和提取 IOS 信号的效果。对每种方法的优缺点进行了仔细分析,以告知 IOS 成像的信号处理选择。我们得出的结论是,空间高斯滤波是改善空间 IOS 响应的最有效选择,而当周期性刺激是一种选择时,时间低通和带通滤波对产生时间响应效果最佳。全局信号回归和截断差分也效果很好,并且不需要周期性刺激。